Optimal staffing of helicopter emergency medical services is controversial

The Importance of Ground Critical Care Transport

Critical care transport (CCT) teams are specialized transport services, comprised of highly trained paramedics, nurses, and occasionally respiratory therapists, offering an expanded scope of practice beyond advanced life support (ALS) emergency medical service teams. We report 4 cases of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome from influenza in need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation evaluation at a tertiary care center, transported by ground. Our medical center did not previously have a ground CCT service, and therefore, in these cases, a physician and/or a respiratory therapist was sent with the paramedic team. In all 4 cases, the ground transport team enhanced the intensive care provided to these patients prior to arrival at the tertiary care center. In 2 of the cases, although limited by the profound hypoxemia, the team decreased the pressures and tidal volumes in an effort to approach evidence-based ventilator goals. In 3 cases, they stopped bicarbonate drips being used to treat mixed metabolic and respiratory acidosis, and in 1 case, they administered furosemide. In 1 case, they started cisatracurium, and in 3 others, they initiated inhaled epoprostenol. Existing literature supports the use of CCT teams over ALS teams for transport of the most critically ill patients, and helicopter CCT is not always available or practical. Therefore, offering comparable air and ground options, with similar staffing and resources, is a hallmark of a mature medical system with an integrated approach to CCT.

Aeromedical retrieval for critical clinical conditions: 12 years of experience with the Royal Flying Doctor Service, Queensland, Australia

BACKGROUND

The Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS) has been providing emergency aeromedical retrieval services in Queensland, Australia since 1928.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This article details service and delivery structure plus a description of 12 years of experience managing patients with critical clinical conditions.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective longitudinal analysis of the demographics and diagnostic classification of all cases of critical clinical severity conducted March 1, 1994 through February 28, 2006.

RESULTS

There were a total of 72,054 retrievals, with trauma the single most common clinical diagnosis. There were 4259 retrievals for patients with critical clinical conditions (6%). The most common categories of clinical diagnosis were: trauma with 1493 (35.1%), respiratory diseases 1386 (32.5%), and circulatory diseases 908 (21.3%). Trauma accounted for 69 of the 90 (77%) primary retrievals from locations without health care facilities. The death rate in transport was 1%, with most of these involving males from locations with minimal health facilities.

CONCLUSION

The RFDS in Queensland is an effective provider of fixed-wing aeromedical retrieval services, operating in an unusual environment with vast distances, low population density, and a high number of Indigenous people.

Paramedic intubation of patients with severe head injury: a review of current Australian practice and recommendations for change

Secondary brain injury may occur early after severe traumatic brain injury due to hypoxia and/or hypotension. Prehospital care by ambulance paramedics has the goal of preventing and treating these complications and, thus, improving outcomes. In Australia, most ambulance services recommend paramedics attempt endotracheal intubation in patients with severe head injury. Even though most patients with severe head injury retain airway reflexes, most states do not allow the use of appropriate drugs to facilitate intubation. In contrast, recent evidence from trauma registries suggests that this approach may be associated with significantly worse outcomes compared with no intubation. Two states allow intubation facilitated by sedative (but not relaxant) drugs, but this has a low success rate and could worsen brain injury because of a decrease in cerebral perfusion pressure. For road-based paramedics, the role of rapid sequence intubation is uncertain. Given the risks of this procedure and the lack of proven benefit, this procedure should not be introduced without supportive evidence from randomised, controlled trials. In contrast, for safety reasons, comatose patients transported by helicopter should undergo rapid sequence intubation prior to flight. However, this is not authorised in most states, despite good supportive evidence that this can be safely and effectively undertaken by paramedics. Finally, there is evidence that inadvertent hyperventilation is associated with adverse outcome, yet only two ambulance services use waveform capnography in head injury patients who are intubated. Overall, current paramedic airway practice in most states of Australia is not supported by the evidence and is probably associated with worse patient outcomes after severe head injury. For road-based paramedics, rapid transport to hospital without intubation should be regarded as the current standard of care. Rapid sequence intubation should be limited to use within appropriate clinical trials, or patients transported by helicopter. For patients who are intubated, waveform capnography is essential to confirm tracheal placement and to prevent inadvertent hyperventilation.

Helicopter primary retrieval: Tasking who should do it?

BACKGROUND

Cairns Base Hospital utilizes a helicopter retrieval system, which until 2001 had been tasked and staffed by emergency physicians. Since 2001, the ambulance service has assumed the role of both tasking and staffing the helicopter with intensive care paramedics. The present study examines whether the change has resulted in different activation patterns and patient outcomes.

METHOD

A retrospective chart review over 4 consecutive years, comparing the two groups, was carried out examining 30 day mortality, length of in-hospital stay, transfer rates, the Revised Trauma Score where appropriate and rates of discharge directly from the ED.

RESULTS

A total of 374 patients were retrieved (211 patients in the emergency physician group from 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2001 and 163 in the ambulance group from 1 April 2001 to 31 March 2003) over the 4 year period. The demographics of the two groups were similar. Fifty-four patients in the ambulance group (33.1%) were discharged from the ED without admission while 31 (14.7%) were discharged from the physician group. This was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). There were no other significant differences between the two groups. The subgroup of patients admitted also did not show any significant difference in outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The similarities in outcomes for admitted patients support the view that both groups have similar tasking criteria for high-acuity patients and suggest that paramedics are as efficacious as physicians in delivering prehospital care in this group of patients. However, for lower-acuity patients, there is a statistically significant higher rate of clinically unnecessary taskings by the ambulance group. Given the recent fatal aeromedical accidents in Queensland (Thursday Island 1998, Rockhampton 1999 and Mackay 2003), it would seem prudent to reduce clinically unnecessary retrievals through clinical coordination with appropriately qualified emergency physicians.