The HelpED Study: Agreement and Impact of the Erection Hardness Score on Sexual Function and Psychosocial Outcomes in Men with Erectile Dysfunction and Their Partners

Erection hardness score or penile Doppler ultrasound: which is a better predictor of failure of nonsurgical treatment of erectile dysfunction?

Background

In the evaluation of men presenting for erectile dysfunction (ED), specific diagnostic tests, such as an intracavernous injection test (IIT) with Erection Hardness Score (EHS) assessment or penile Doppler ultrasound (PDU), may be necessary.

Aim

The study sought to compare the prognostic value of PDU parameters with erection rigidity with EHS during IIT in predicting refractory ED after 5 years.

Methods

Patients referred for ED were evaluated and had a PDU with at least 15 μg of intracavernous alprostadil and without any sexual stimulation. At 5 years of follow-up, current and past ED treatments were noted. Refractory ED was defined as having a penile prosthesis (PP) implanted, having failed nonsurgical treatments but having refused PP implantation, or having discontinuation of nonsurgical treatments due to loss of efficacy. Patients with hypogonadism and pelvic surgery were excluded. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Outcomes

The outcome was the AUC for predicting refractory ED.

Results

At 5 years, 69 men were still in follow-up with a mean age of 58.47 ± 10.39 years, and 13 (18.8%) were classified as having refractory ED. The AUC for the EHS, peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic flow, and resistive index to discriminate refractory ED were 0.820, 0.613, 0.730, and 0.714, respectively.

Clinical Implications

EHS can be a good predictor of response to nonsurgical treatments in ED.

Strengths and Limitations

This was a prospective study to compare IIT with PDU, and validated disease-specific questionnaires were used to assess both clinical efficacy and satisfaction. PDU was performed by a blinded third party. However, resulting from a single-center study, our sample size can be considered small, and the number of events observed was also low.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that an abnormal EHS during an IIT is, at least, noninferior than an abnormal PDU in predicting those patients that will not respond to nonsurgical treatments and that will need a PP in long-term.

Modern treatment strategies for penile prosthetics in Peyronie's disease: a contemporary clinical review

Peyronie's disease is a common condition resulting in penile deformity, psychological bother, and sexual dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is one common comorbid condition seen in men with Peyronie's disease, and its presence significantly impacts treatment considerations. In a man with Peyronie's disease and significant erectile dysfunction who desires the most reliable treatment, penile prosthesis placement should be strongly considered. In some instances, such as those patients with relatively mild curvature, prosthesis placement alone may result in adequate straightening. However, many patients will require additional straightening maneuvers such as manual modeling, penile plication, and tunica albuginea incision with or without grafting. For patients with severe penile shortening, penile length restoration techniques may also be considered. Herein, we provide a comprehensive clinical review of penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie's disease. Specifically, we discuss preoperative indications, intraoperative considerations, adjunctive straightening maneuvers, and postoperative outcomes.

Carotid artery intima-media thickness can predict the response of patients with erectile dysfunction to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors

This study investigated the role of carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) as a morphological marker of the response of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) patients to tadalafil, one of the phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5-I). Through March-December 2016, 51 men with vasculogenic ED aged over 30 years were enrolled in this prospective study. Vasculogenic ED was accepted as a normal testosterone level, with penile colour Doppler ultrasonography showing arteriogenic ED, venogenic ED or mixed arteriogenic and venogenic ED. All patients underwent biochemical and hormonal blood tests, ultrasonographic evaluation of the common carotid artery (CCA) IMT and penile colour Doppler ultrasonography. On-demand tadalafil (10 mg or 20 mg in cases of a non-response to 10 mg) was administered to each patient for 2 months. ED was assessed using the short form of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) before and after the drug therapy. According to the patients' responses to the medication, they were grouped as non-responders or responders. Thirty-one of the 51 patients responded to tadalafil. The mean CCA IMT of the non-responders and responders was 0.9 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm, respectively (P = 0.000). The IMT of 90% of the non-responders was >0.67 mm, whereas it was >0.67 mm in 40% of the responders. The data were analysed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Chi-square test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Measurement of CCA IMT may offer an alternative and simple method to predict the response of vasculogenic ED patients to PDE5-Is.

[Assessment of the erectile function and patients' perception of improvement in Spanish patients with erectile dysfunction]

OBJECTIVE

This study has been carried out to assess the hardness of erection and the perception of improvement in erectile function with the treatments received during the last month.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Descriptive, observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study carried out in 30 urology sites in Spain. Patients diagnosed of erectile dysfunction receiving treatment during at least the last month have been enrolled. Hardness of erection has been assessed with the erection hardness score and improvement perception has been estimated with the global assessment question.

RESULTS

A 63% of patients had a hardness of erection that was insufficient for penetration, but 75% of patients referred that their erectile function had improved with treatment. After adjustment for other factors, erection hardness score values were not significantly different among patients being treated with alprostadil topical cream, compared to patients being treated with the combination of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors plus alprostadil topical cream or with PDE5i other than sildenafil alone. However, patients treated with alprostadil topical cream had a significantly higher chance of referring an improvement in their erectile function compared to patients treated with PDE5i, despite the fact that they had received treatment for a shorter period of time.

CONCLUSION

Hardness of erection is just another factor of erectile function, but it is not the only one influencing improvement perception by patients.

Is there a relation between priapism occurring after penile doppler ultrasonography and international erectile function index score and erection hardness score levels?

OBJECTIVE

The relation between Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and The International Erectile Function Index (IIEF) Questionnaire- Erectile Function Domain Score (IIEF-EF score) used in erectile dysfunction (ED) evaluation and the prevalence of priapism after penile Doppler ultrasonography (PDU) was examined in this study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 62 patients who had PDU were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups; there were 33 patients in IIEF-EF score ≤10, EHS <2 group (Group 1) and 29 patients in IIEF-EF score >10, EHS ≥2 group (Group 2). The two groups separated according to their scores were compared for age, body mass index (BMI), prevalence of priapism, vascular comorbidities and duration of erection.

RESULTS

When compared to Group 2, median age, rate of vascular comorbidities rate and BMI were detected to be higher in Group 1 with IIEF-EF score ≤10 and EHS <2. But contrary to age and rate of vascular comorbidities (p=0.035, p=0.049 respectively), higher BMI was detected to be statistically insignificant (p=0.093). Duration of erection, IIEF-EF score and number of cases with priapism were significantly higher in Group 2 with IIEF-EF score >10 and EHS ≥2 (p<0.001, p=0.027, p=0.049 respectively).

CONCLUSION

High IIEF-EF and EHS scores, younger ages and lower rates of vascular comorbidities in patients from whom PDU was demanded increase the prevalence of priapism.

Can lifestyle modification affect men's erectile function?

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition affecting millions of men worldwide. The pathophysiology and epidemiologic links between ED and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) are well-established. Lifestyle modifications such as smoking cessation, weight reduction, dietary modification, physical activity, and psychological stress reduction have been increasingly recognized as foundational to the prevention and treatment of ED. The aim of this review is to outline behavioral choices which may increase ones risk of developing ED, to present relevant studies addressing lifestyle factors correlated with ED, and to highlight proposed mechanisms for intervention aimed at improving erectile function in men with ED. These recommendations can provide a framework for counseling patients with ED about lifestyle modification.

Correlation between erection hardness score and nocturnal penile tumescence measurement

INTRODUCTION

The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and the Sexual Health Inventory for men (SHIM) are patient-reported outcome scoring systems for erectile function. It is unclear which is more reliable for predicting the objective erectile function.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the EHS could predict objective erectile function by measuring the maximal penile circumferential change (MPCC) with an erectometer.

METHODS

The study included 98 patients who visited our clinic from 2005 to 2010. The erectile function was evaluated using the SHIM, EHS, and MPCC. The MPCC was measured with the largest circumferential change of three consecutive occurrences of nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) determined using the erectometer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We defined erectile dysfunction (ED) as MPCC < 20 mm and carried out multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis to clarify the predictors for ED, with the variables including age, the SHIM score, and the EHS. We compared the tendency for MPCC ≥ 20 mm when EHS was 3 or more with that when EHS was 2 or less.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 59.5 years (range 18-83). In logistic regression analysis, the EHS was the only predictor for ED with MPCC < 20 mm. The mean EHS in the MPCC < 20 mm group was 1.64 ± 0.20 (mean ± SEM) and that in the MPCC ≥ 20 mm group was 2.46 ± 0.13 (P = 0.0018). There was a correlation between the EHS and the MPCC (correlation coefficient = 0.33). In comparison with the group having an EHS of 2 or less, that with an EHS of 3 or more tended to have MPCC ≥ 20 mm (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The EHS was correlated with the MPCC. The EHS represents the objective erectile function shown by the measurement of NPT.

Erection hardness score for the evaluation of erectile dysfunction: further psychometric assessment in patients treated by intracavernous prostaglandins injections after radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) affects quality of life in patients treated by radical prostatectomy (RP). The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) is a single-item scale that has demonstrated good psychometric properties for assessing erectile function (EF) in patients treated by sildenafil, but its applicability to other treatment contexts has not yet been tested.

AIM

This study aims to test the validity and time and treatment responsiveness of the EHS to assess ED in men with post-RP ED treated with alprostadil injections.

METHODS

This is a 1-year follow-up cohort study of 75 patients treated by RP for localized prostate cancer in a urology department setting between January 2007 and December 2008. Data were prospectively collected at 6 and 12 months post-RP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The EHS, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) reference questionnaire, the Global Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ), and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS) were collected. Convergent validity (Spearman correlation coefficients with IIEF domains), known-groups validity (comparing EHS scores across ED severity groups), time and treatment responsiveness (effect size with/without treatment and over the follow-up period), and predictive ability (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC-ROC]) were analyzed for this study.

RESULTS

The EHS showed good convergent validity (all Spearman coefficients significant at the P<0.05 level), adequate known-groups validity (global differentiation between IIEF-EF severity groups; P<0.001), and treatment responsiveness (effect size: +1.8 [6 months], +2.1 [12 months]), but limited time responsiveness and predictive ability of the EHS for a normal EF at 12 months follow-up when compared with the IIEF-EF domain (AUC-ROC: 0.72 vs. 0.85; P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the overall good psychometric properties of the EHS in patients with post-RP ED treated with alprostadil injections. However, evidence for limited predictive validity and responsiveness to change over time should be considered for its use in clinical follow-up in this population.

Development of UK recommendations on treatment for post-surgical erectile dysfunction

AIM

To develop a management strategy (rehabilitation programme) for postsurgical erectile dysfunction (ED) among men experiencing ED associated with treatment of prostate, bladder or rectal cancer that is suitable for use in a UK NHS healthcare context.

METHODS

PubMed literature searches of ED management together with a survey of 13 experts in the management of ED from across the UK were conducted.

RESULTS

Data from 37 articles and completed questionnaires were collated. The results discussed in this study demonstrate improved objective and subjective clinical outcomes for physical parameters, sexual satisfaction, and rates of both spontaneous erections and those associated with ED treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION

Based on the literature and survey analysis, recommendations are proposed for the standardisation of management strategies employed for postsurgical ED.