Prevention of malignant seeding at drain sites by hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with pleural mesothelioma

Prophylactic radiotherapy for procedure tract metastases in mesothelioma: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy with a very poor prognosis. The majority of patients require pleural procedures for diagnostic or fluid management purposes. Damage to the pleura during these procedures can lead to procedure tract metastases (PTMs), with increasing risk from larger interventions. Prophylactic radiotherapy to these sites is a controversial topic with conflicting results from trial data. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four RCTs have been published on this topic, with another in follow-up. The earliest, from a cohort of 40 patients, strongly advocated the use of prophylactic radiotherapy. More recent trials, most notably the Surgical and large bore procedures in Malignant pleural mesothelioma And Radiotherapy Trial (SMART) (which randomized over 200 patients) did not demonstrate any benefit, especially when patient report symptoms and cost-effectiveness are considered. Certain subgroups demand further investigation, such as those not receiving systematic chemotherapy or with surgical intervention sites. The soon to be published Prophylactic Irradiation of Tracts (PIT) trial may help to further clarify best practice.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have shown that prophylactic radiotherapy should not be routinely used to prevent PTMs in mesothelioma. Instead patients should undergo careful clinical follow-up to ensure PTMs are identified and treated promptly to minimize symptoms.

[Prophylactic radiotherapy in a single fraction of 10Gy at intervention pleural site in patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma: A retrospective monocentric cohort study]

PURPOSE

Prophylactic radiotherapy to prevent procedure-tracts metastases from malignant pleural mesothelioma remains controversial and clinical practice varies. The purpose was to assess the efficacy of local radiotherapy in a single fraction of 10Gy in preventing malignant seeding at intervention pleural site in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study, including patients with histological confirmed malignant pleural mesothelioma treated by prophylactic irradiation to prevent interventional site metastases with a unique fraction of 10Gy with 6 to 18MeV, from January 1990 to December 2013 in the institut de cancérologie de Lorraine (Nancy, France).

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were treated by irradiation in intervention site, involving 120 intervention pleural sites, 91 thoracoscopies, 17 thoracotomies with chest drain and 12 CT or ultrasound guided needle biopsies. The median follow-up was 7 months (interquartile between 3 and 15 months). The overall survival was 43.5% at 12 months. The local progression free survival was 43.7% at 12 month. The incidence of local recurrence was 8% at 12 months. The median interval from radiotherapy to local recurrence was 4 months (2; 32). No grade II or higher toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Irradiation of pleural intervention sites with a single fraction of 10Gy is effective, well tolerated, simple, fast and cost effective.

Radiotherapy applications of patients with malignant mesothelioma: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

In the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma, radiotherapy has been used for the purpose of prophylaxis to reduce the incidence of recurrence at surgical insertion sites or palliate the symptoms.

AIM

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the techniques and effectiveness of radiotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four (18 female, 26 male) patients diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had surgery or thoracoscopic biopsy for diagnosis, staging or treatment and all received palliative or prophylactic radiotherapy. Fifty-seven percent of the patients received chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Prophylactic radiation was applied to 27 patients with 4-15 MeV electron energies. The median radiotherapy dose was 30 Gy with 3 Gy daily fraction dose. During treatment, 12 patients had grade 1 erythema according to the RTOG scale. In 3 (12%) patients, a local failure at treatment field was observed. Palliative radiotherapy was applied to 17 patients for pain palliation. The median radiation dose was 40 Gy with 2 Gy daily fraction dose by using 6-18 MV photon and/or 4-12 MeV electron energies. Two patients had grade 1 erythema and one patient had grade 2 odynophagy according to the RTOG scale. For 10 (59%) patients, palliation of chest pain was delivered. No late toxicity was observed for all cases.

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed that prophylactic and palliative radiotherapy are effective and safe therapy modalities in malignant pleural mesothelioma in preventing seeding metastasis at intervention sites or relieving pain. Prospective randomized studies are still needed to determine the benefits of radiotherapy application and to indicate optimum dose schemes.

Should all patients who have mesothelioma diagnosed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery have their intervention sites irradiated?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether patients diagnosed with mesothelioma by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery should have their intervention sites irradiated to prevent metastatic seeding. Altogether 334 papers were found using the reported search, of which nine represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. There is no general consensus in the literature. Four studies recommend prophylactic irradiation therapy (PIT), while three studies stated that PIT was unnecessary. A systematic review identified only three suitable randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the literature. One trial found that 23% of radiotherapy (RT) patients developed tract metastases compared to 10% of control patients (P=0.748) with an estimated hazard ratio (RT to control) of 1.28 (95% CI: 0.29-5.73). Time from procedure to tract metastases was in fact shorter in patients treated with RT (2.4 months RT vs. 6.4 months control, non-significant). Another trial found that seeding of metastatic tumour to the intervention site occurred in 7% of RT sites vs. 10% of control sites (P=0.53). Freedom from tract metastasis survival was also non-significant between RT and control arms (P=0.82). However, the third trial reported a significantly greater incidence of intervention site metastases in control vs. RT patients (40% vs. 0%, respectively, P<0.001). Non-randomised studies found mixed results. One reported that median survival between patients with and without local metastases was not significantly different (P=0.64) while another article described no local metastases in PIT sites. None of the studies reported significant skin or side reactions and treatment was generally well tolerated. Based on the available evidence, we conclude that PIT is not currently justified.