Management of Anti-allogeneic Antibody Elimination by Apheresis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation with high preoperative antibody titer: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is essential for expanding the donor pool. ABOi-LDLT prognosis has improved since desensitization treatment with rituximab; however, patients with high antibody titers are considered to be at high risk of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Nevertheless, the preoperative antibody titer cutoff levels that preclude ABOi-LDLT have not yet been determined. In this study, the highest preoperative antibody titer was 1:4096, and the recipient had good outcomes. There has been only one report of good outcomes with a preoperative antibody titer of more than 1:4096. We hypothesized that high preoperative antibody titers in ABOi-LDLT may not be associated with AMR in protocols involving rituximab.

CASE PRESENTATION

The recipient was a 22-year-old man with biliary atresia and underwent ABOi-LDLT (B to O). We administered 500 mg of rituximab 14 days prior and then 300 mg of rituximab one day prior to ABOi-LDLT. The recipients preoperative IgG antibody titer was 1:4096. Postoperative immunosuppressive protocol involved steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. The patient had satisfactory graft function three years following ABOi-LDLT.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The antibody that is responsible for posttransplant AMR should be newly synthesized after transplantation as a result of sensitization by antigens on the vascular endothelial cells of the graft. In ABOi-LDLT, natural antibodies may not cause AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important factor for preventing AMR in recipients undergoing ABOi-LDLT is the suppression of de novo antibodies. High preoperative antibody titers may not necessarily preclude ABOi-LDLT, provided that rituximab is used in desensitization.

A simplified protocol using rituximab and immunoglobulin for ABO-incompatible low-titre living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

No consensus has been reached regarding optimal treatment strategies for ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We introduce a simplified protocol using rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

Data were analysed on adult patients who underwent ABO-I LDLT of which protocol added rituximab (300 mg/m² ) before surgery and IVIG (0.8 g/kg) on post-operative days 1 and 4 to the conventional immunosuppressive regimen used in ABO-compatible (ABO-C) LDLT, without plasmapheresis, splenectomy or graft local infusion. The outcomes were compared with those of ABO-C LDLT by 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Consecutive 43 ABO-I LDLT patients were identified between 2014 and 2016. Before desensitization, the median isoagglutinin titre was 1:8 (range, 1:2-1:64). The titre was reduced to 4 (range, 0-16) at the time of LDLT. None showed a rebound rise of isoagglutinin titres. No antibody-mediated rejection occurred. Biliary stricture was the most common complication with an incidence of 30.2%. A comparator group of 86 ABO-C LDLT patients were selected. There was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate including acute cellular rejection, biliary complications and infection between ABO-I and ABO-C groups. The 3-year cumulative patient survival rates in the ABO-I and ABO-C groups were 82.4% and 85.9% respectively (P = .115).

CONCLUSIONS

A simplified protocol using rituximab and IVIG for ABO-I LDLT was safe and effective in achieving sufficient desensitization and comparable outcomes in patients with the titre no higher than 1:64.

A modified protocol with rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin in emergent ABO-incompatible liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND

The established procedure for ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABO-I LT) was too complicated to be used in case of emergency. We developed a protocol consisting of rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for ABO-I LT in patients with acute liver failure (ALF).

METHODS

The data from 101 patients who had undergone liver transplantation (LT) for ALF were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: ABO-compatible liver transplantation group (ABO-C LT, n=66) and ABO-I LT group (n=35). All the patients in the ABO-I LT group received a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m2) and IVIG (0.4 g/kg per day) at the beginning of the operation. IVIG was administered for 10 consecutive days after LT. Plasma exchange, splenectomy and graft local infusion were omitted in the protocol. Quadruple immunosuppressive therapy including basiliximab, corticosteroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolatemofetil was used to reinforce immunosuppression.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative patient survival rates in the ABO-I LT and ABO-C LT groups were 83.1% and 86.3%, respectively (P>0.05), and the graft survival rates were 80.0% and 86.3%, respectively (P>0.05). Two patients (5.7%) suffered from antibody-mediated rejection in the ABO-I LT group. Other complications such as acute cellular rejection, biliary complication and infection displayed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified treatment consisting of rituximab and IVIG prevented antibody-mediated rejection for LT of blood-type incompatible patients. With this treatment, the patients did not need plasma exchange, splenectomy and graft local infusion. This treatment was safe and efficient for LT of the patients with ALF.

Nucleoside analogue therapy following one-year course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation after living donor liver transplantation

The combination therapy with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside analogue is well tolerated for the hepatitis B recipients after liver transplantation, but its cost is an important problem in these days. Here we report the efficacy of nucleoside analogue therapy following one-year course of HBIG plus nucleoside analogue after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Out of 103 LDLTs, we selected 14 recipients who received the post-transplant therapy against reactivation of hepatitis B virus for more than 30 months. Those were eight patients with chronic hepatitis B, three with fulminant hepatitis, and three whose donors were positive for antibody to HB core antigen (HBc). During two days after the operation, HBIG (40,000 units) was administered, and the serum level of antibody to HB surface antigen (HBs) was maintained at around 150 IU/L for one year by monthly administration of HBIG. After one year, HBIG was withdrawn. A nucleoside analogue was administered daily from just after LDLT, and it was continued up to the present. Among the 14 patients, two recipients had recurrence of hepatitis B. Three patients, including one patient with recurrence of hepatitis B, died due to hepatocellular carcinoma or its associated cirrhosis; namely, their deaths are unrelated to hepatitis B-related diseases. The remaining 11 patients are leading normal lives. In conclusion, nucleoside analogue therapy after one-year course of HBIG plus nucleoside analogue is feasible and cost-effective in preventing HBV reactivation. But the patients are still at risk of breakthrough and some patients may need continued prophylaxis with HBIG.

Pediatric patients receiving ABO-incompatible living related liver transplantation exhibit higher serum transforming growth factor-β1, interferon-γ and interleukin-2 levels

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (LTx) is becoming more common in response to the paucity of liver allografts. Several studies have expressed concern about the effect of ABO compatibility on graft survival.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in serum cytokine levels between ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) and ABO-compatible (ABO-c; includes ABO-compatible and identical) pediatric LTx recipients during regular outpatient follow-up. Note that, in the field of organ transplantation, transplants are categorized as incompatible, compatible or identical; accordingly, these are the terms we use in the paper.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A clinical outpatient study measuring serum transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-10 in 43 living related liver transplantation (LRLT) recipients, of whom 36 received ABO-c LRLT (34 were ABO-identical and 2 were non-identical) and 7 ABO-i LRLT. Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase and bilirubin were measured as part of the patients' regular follow-up visits.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the ABO-c and ABO-i groups in terms of recipient's age [mean 12.6 vs. 11.1 years (y)], post-LTx duration (mean 7.3 vs. 7.3 y), donor's age (mean 35.5 vs. 34.6 y), body weight (28.9 ± 2.9 vs. 27.9 ± 6.9 kg), or gender (19 female and 17 male vs. 4 female and 3 male). Serum TGF-β1, IFN-γ and IL-2 were significantly higher in the ABO-i group than in the ABO-c group. IL-10, however, did not differ between the two groups. There was a tendency toward higher γGTP levels in the ABO-i group, but this difference did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

ABO-incompatible LRLTx patients have higher serum TGF-β1, IFN-γ and IL-2 levels as measured at regular outpatient visits. As a result, they face a higher risk of T-helper 1 cell polarization, which could make graft rejection more likely.

Early plasmapheresis and rituximab for acute humoral rejection after ABO-compatible liver transplantation

Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is uncommon after ABO-compatible liver transplantation. Herein, we report two cases of AHR treated with plasmapheresis and rituximab in two ABO-compatible liver-transplant patients with preformed anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies. Patient 1 experienced a biopsy-proven AHR at day 10 post-transplant. She was treated by steroid pulses, and OKT3. Because of persisting signs of biopsy-proven AHR at day 26, she was treated by plasmapheresis and rituximab. Liver enzyme levels did not improve, and she died on day 41. Patient 2 experienced a biopsy-proven AHR on day 10 post-transplant. She was treated by steroid pulses, plasmapheresis, and rituximab. Liver enzymes returned to within normal range 18 d after diagnosis. Liver biopsies, at 3 and 9 mo post-transplant, showed complete resolution of AHR. We conclude that plasmapheresis should be started as soon as AHR is diagnosed, and be associated with a B-cell depleting agent. Rituximab may be considered as a first-line therapy.

Long-term outcome of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

We report the long-term outcome of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) performed in our hospital.

METHODS

We started the LDLT program in 1991 and from that year up to now (2008) 11 patients have received an ABO-incompatible graft.

RESULTS

Nine out of the 11 cases have survived from 3.7 years to 13.9 years (mean 7.3 years) and they are in good conditions at present. Seven patients were subjected to preoperative apheresis. Eight patients experienced acute rejection and of them, 6 experienced steroid-resistant rejection that was treated with deoxyspergualin and apheresis. One patient who suffered rapidly progressing rejection died due to liver failure. Three patients who were administered rituximab did not suffer severe rejection nor adverse effects. During the long-term follow up 5 recipients had major complications such as postoperative lymphoproliferative disease, post-transplantation diabetes mellitus, portal vein occlusion and biliary stenosis. But those complications were controlled under stable conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that long-term survival can be expected after ABO-incompatible LDLT provided perioperative complications such as humoral rejection are overcome.

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation: new insights into clinical relevance

Short-term outcome of the ABO-incompatible liver transplantation has been improved dramatically due to novel immnosuppressive protocols and apheresis. This review will discuss current understanding of the clinical relevance of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation including long-term outcome mainly from the Japanese experience.