Ratio of Platelet Reduction is an Early Predictive Factor for the Effectiveness of Leukocytapheresis for Ulcerative Colitis Patients

Multicenter prospective study for clinical and endoscopic efficacies of leukocytapheresis therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) and to investigate predictive factors for mucosal healing and a sustained clinical response in steroid-free and steroid-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-one steroid-free or steroid-refractory patients with active UC were enrolled. Five or ten consecutive sessions of LCAP were performed in each patient. The efficacy and tolerability was then evaluated at weeks 3 and 6. Endoscopic examination was performed at week 6 to evaluate the mucosal healing, and the sustained cumulative response rate was evaluated at 12 months.

RESULTS

At week 6, the mean Mayo clinical activity score had decreased significantly from 8.0 to 4.6 in the steroid-free patients and from 8.3 to 3.9 in the steroid-refractory patients. Rachmilewitz's endoscopic index had also decreased significantly from 9.1 to 6.1 in the steroid-free patients and from 10.0 to 5.7 in the steroid-refractory patients. Forty-seven percent of the steroid-free patients and 33% of the steroid-refractory patients achieved mucosal healing. The peripheral platelet counts had decreased significantly at weeks 3 and 6 in the mucosal healing group, compared with the non-mucosal healing group. The patients with a more than 15% platelet reduction had a significantly higher cumulative response rate, compared with the patients without a platelet reduction (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

LCAP is beneficial for the induction of mucosal healing in steroid-free and steroid-refractory patients with UC. The degree of platelet reduction during LCAP might be a predictive marker for mucosal healing and a sustained clinical response.

Readministration of calcineurin inhibitors for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus have been shown to be effective for treatment of patients with steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) with moderate to severe activity. However, it has not been determined whether readministration of CNIs is effective in patients who experience relapse after remission induced by CNIs.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of readministration of CNIs in patients who had initially responded to CNIs.

METHODS

A review of the medical records of 46 patients with moderate to severe UC who were treated with a CNI at a single tertiary teaching hospital with 840 beds was conducted. Remission was defined as a clinical activity index (CAI) score of 3 or less within 2 months of starting CNI therapy. Response was defined as a CAI score of 4 or higher but had decreased by half from the start of CNI therapy. Relapse was defined as flare-up of symptoms that required an additional treatment or colectomy.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients, 37 (80%) achieved clinical remission or response with the initial CNI treatment. Among those 37 patients, 19 experienced relapse (median duration to relapse, 6.4 months), 12 of whom were readministered a CNI. Of the 12 patients, 2 achieved clinical remission, 2 had a response, and the remaining 8 had no response to the CNI. In addition, all patients who responded to CNI readministration experienced relapse within 6 months. CNI readministration was significantly less effective than the initial administration for treatment of UC (80% vs 33%; p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSIONS

Readministration of CNIs for relapse after remission with CNI treatment does not seem to be successful. Alternative therapies such as anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody should be used or colectomy should be considered.