Induction of spermatogenesis in men with azoospermia or severe oligoteratoasthenospermia after antegrade internal spermatic vein sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele

Varicocele repair for severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: Scoping review of published guidelines, and systematic review of the literature

Background

The outcomes of varicocele repair (VR) for severe oligozooasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) have not been widely examined.

Methods

Assessment of outcomes of VR after severe OAT, employing scoping review of published guidelines, and systematic review of literature. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale appraised the quality of included studies. Findings from both reviews were used to identify knowledge gaps and ways to enhance the evidence base.

Results

No published guidelines exist specifically on VR for severe OAT. Of 731 articles retrieved, 15 were included, indicating a scarcity of studies appraising the topic. Most included studies exhibited high risk of bias and low-level evidence. Studies focused on basic sperm parameters; fewer examined hormonal/testicular volume changes, or pregnancy/live births. Studies suggested some post-VR sperm parameters improvements but mostly no changes in hormone levels/testicular volume. We identified four knowledge gaps: methodological issues; narrow scope of research and measurement aspects; lack of genetic considerations; and scarce economic/cost-effectiveness appraisals. We propose some precautions, remedies, and research questions to enhance the thin evidence base.

Conclusions

VR for severe OAT has potential to improve sperm parameters. Scarcity of studies, high risk of bias, low-level evidence, and other limitations mitigate against drawing solid conclusions. Future research is required.

Varicocele and nonobstructive azoospermia

Approximately 15% of men in the general population have varicoceles, and varicoceles are diagnosed in 40% of men presenting for fertility evaluations. One percent of men in the general population are azoospermic, and 15% of men presenting for fertility evaluations are diagnosed with azoospermia. This article aims to review the impact of varicoceles on testicular function in men with azoospermia, the impact of varicocele repair on the semen parameters of azoospermic men, and the impact of varicocele repair on sperm retrieval and pregnancy outcomes when the male partner remains azoospermic after varicocele repair.

Seminal TEX101 May Predict Seminal Sperm Recovery after Varicocelectomy in Nonobstructive Azoospermic Patients with Varicocele

Background. Infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) associated with varicocele may benefit from varicocele repair with recovered sperms in semen. Currently, there is no clinically applied method to predict the success of seminal sperm recovery in this subset of azoospermic men. Objective. We aimed to evaluate the predictive role of the seminal testis expressed protein (TEX101) in sperm recovery in the semen of NOA men with palpable bilateral varicocele after microsurgical varicocelectomy. Patients and Methods. This prospective cross-sectional cohort study included 40 patients with NOA and bilateral varicocele. Seminal TEX101 levels were measured followed by subinguinal microsurgical varicocele repair. Two seminal analyses were carried out at 3- and 6-month follow-up periods to evaluate seminal sperm recovery. Results. After varicocele repair, sperms were recovered in the semen of 10/40 patients (25%) along the follow-up periods (seven patients after 3 months and additional three patients after 6 months). The preoperative median seminal TEX101 level was significantly higher in NOA men with seminal sperm recovery compared with NOA patients without seminal sperm recovery (13.5 vs. 9.8 ng/ml, $p=0.014$ ). Besides, the serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) median levels were significantly higher in NOA men without seminal sperm recovery compared with NOA men with seminal sperm recovery ( $p=0.001$ , $p=0.01$ ). There were nonsignificant differences comparing the preoperative testicular volume or serum testosterone levels between the two investigated groups ( $p=0.072$ , $p=0.272$ ). A cutoff value of 9.9 ng/ml was demonstrated to have preoperative TEX101 prediction of seminal sperm recovery (sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 57%). Conclusion. Preoperative seminal TEX101 could be considered as a biomarker for sperm recovery for seminal sperm recovery in NOA cases associated with varicocele after its surgical repair. Further work at this point with larger number of cases should be carried out to verify its potential importance.

The Fate of Leydig Cells in Men with Spermatogenic Failure

The steroidogenic cells in the testicle, Leydig cells, located in the interstitial compartment, play a vital role in male reproductive tract development, maintenance of proper spermatogenesis, and overall male reproductive function. Therefore, their dysfunction can lead to all sorts of testicular pathologies. Spermatogenesis failure, manifested as azoospermia, is often associated with defective Leydig cell activity. Spermatogenic failure is the most severe form of male infertility, caused by disorders of the testicular parenchyma or testicular hormone imbalance. This review covers current progress in knowledge on Leydig cells origin, structure, and function, and focuses on recent advances in understanding how Leydig cells contribute to the impairment of spermatogenesis.

Varicoceles in Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia: The Dilemma to Operate or Not

The knowledge on male reproduction is constantly expanding, especially in treating infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Varicocele is occasionally diagnosed in a subpopulation of males with NOA. Varicocele repair in NOA-men may contribute to the reappearance of spermatozoa in semen. However, spontaneous pregnancies are observed in only a small percentage of NOA-men post-varicocelectomy. Additionally, it has been reported that the repair of varicocele in NOA-men (before the performance of sperm retrieval techniques) may increase the testicular sperm recovery rate. In addition, it increases the pregnancy rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programs in NOA-men without spermatozoa in the semen post-varicocelectomy. In addition, to the improvement in Sertoli cellular secretory function, varicocelectomy may increase the secretory function of Leydig cells, which subsequently results in improved androgen production, raising the probability to negate the need for testosterone replacement therapy in cases of late-onset hypogonadism. On the other hand, the benefit of varicocelectomy in patients with NOA is still debatable. The current review study aims to provide a critical and extensive review of varicocele repair in males with NOA. This study additionally focuses on the impact of varicocele repair on sperm retrieval rates and its influence on the ICSI outcomes for those couples who remain negative for spermatozoa in their semen samples post-varicocelectomy.

Does varicocelectomy improve semen in men with azoospermia and clinically palpable varicocele?

The effectiveness of varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermia is controversial. The current study assessed the efficacy of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermic men with palpable varicocele and to evaluate predictive parameters of outcome. We reviewed the records of 723 patients who had microsurgical varicocelectomy and diagnostic testicular biopsy between 2012 and 2016 at a tertiary medical centre. Data pertaining to the physical, laboratory (semen analysis and hormonal profile) and histopathology features were examined, exploring the predictors of improvement in semen analysis post-varicocelectomy. In total, 42 patients with mean age 35.71 ± 6.35 years were included. After a mean varicocelectomy follow-up of 6.7 months, motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate could be observed in 11 patients (26.2). Out of all the factors examined, only testicular histopathology significantly predicted post-varicocelectomy outcome, where 8/11 patients exhibited hypospermatogenesis, and 3/11 Sertoli cell-only regained spermatozoa in semen. Microsurgical varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermic men with clinically palpable varicocele can result in sperm appearance in the ejaculate with the highest success expected in hypospermatogenesis.

Indications and outcomes of varicocele repair

Varicoceles exert deleterious effect on testicular function. The condition has been associated with male infertility, testicular hypotrophy and pain. These comprises the common indications for varicocele repair currently. Significant improvement in semen parameters and pregnancy outcomes had been suggested by reports decades ago. However, selection of the best candidates remains an issue since not all patients respond positively to treatment. Consensus has been reached in recent decade after the publication of a series of meta-analyses. Significant improvement in pregnancy outcomes were reported in patients with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters. Varicocelectomy in adolescents with testicular hypotrophy was supported by the positive implication on catch-up growth and semen parameters. However, little is known about the treatment effect of adolescence varicocelectomy on long term fertility and paternity rate. Recent studies on outcome of varicocele repair for pain consistently demonstrated a resolution rate of approximately 90% and support varicocele-associated pain as an indication for surgery. Alternate indications for varicocele repair have been proposed in recent decade. Despite the encouraging preliminary data, most studies were uncontrolled retrospective series. Although varicocelectomy may not obviate the need for assisted reproductive techniques in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, it potentially increases sperm retrieval rate. The significant increase in serum testosterone after varicocelectomy in patients with androgen deficiency may open an alternative treatment for hypogonadism. The adjunctive role of varicocelectomy before assisted reproduction and the significant decrease in sperm DNA fragmentation after varicocele repair deserve further well-designed controlled studies.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: preoperative patient optimization, surgical technique, and tissue processing

Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the literature pertaining to patient optimization before mTESE, mTESE technique, and post-mTESE testicular tissue processing. Preoperative patient optimization has been assessed in terms of adjuvant hormone therapy and varicocele repair. Limited data are available for adjuvant medical therapy, and although also limited, data for varicocele repair support increased sperm retrieval, pregnancy, and return of sperm to the ejaculate. Post-mTESE tissue processing has few comparative studies; however, most studies support the combination of mechanical mincing and use of type 4 collagenase for tissue disintegration along with pentoxifylline to assist in identifying motile and viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Should the current guidelines for the treatment of varicoceles in infertile men be re-evaluated?

Male infertility is a major health burden worldwide. In the United Kingdom, the diagnostic and treatment pathway for male factor fertility is fragmented with wide variance in management and funding protocols. There is now a focus on potential overtreatment of couples with IVF and failure to treat male factors before considering assisted reproductive technology (ART). Despite this, contemporary Urological guidelines are not definitive in the indications for varicocele treatment, whilst the current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines do not advocate surgical intervention. While controversy exists concerning the effects of varicocele treatment on natural pregnancy rates, there is growing evidence that varicocele treatment can have additional positive effects on fertility by reducing their impact on sperm DNA fragmentation and improving ART outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that azoospermic men may become oligospermic following varicocele intervention, obviating the need for surgical sperm retrieval. Sperm retrieval rates also increase following varicocele treatment in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. The contemporary literature demonstrates a clear clinical benefit for treating varicoceles in infertile men, which may be more cost-effective than proceeding to immediate ART. This review comprehensively evaluates the current indications for varicocele treatment, and it is proposed that these should be redefined in contemporary guidelines to reflect current advances in male fertility research.

Should we expand the indications for varicocele treatment?

Current guidelines suggest that treatment of varicocele should be considered in patients with clinically palpable disease and abnormal semen parameters. However, the clinicians are often challenged with the decision whether to treat varicocele in patients with testicular pain or low testosterone levels. Moreover, varicocele is highly associated with DNA fragmentation due to the oxidative stress and it has been demonstrated that surgical repair of varicocele ameliorates oxidative stress markers and consequently the sperm DNA integrity. These new markers could have an adjunctive role to standard semen parameters especially when normal semen analysis is found in adult men with conventional methods. This review presents a contemporary overview of the rationale for varicocele treatment, as well as of the relationship between varicocele and other novel parameters such as DNA fragmentation index and reactive oxygen species. We will also discuss data from several recent series demonstrating that surgical treatment and especially microsurgical approach could resolve testicular pain, increase testosterone levels and fertility rate both in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia as well as in normozoospermia men. The correlation with progressive testicular failure will be also examined. We hope that this overview will provide clinicians with an evidence-based approach to managing these unanswered and conflicting topics.

Outcome of varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this systemic review was to evaluate the benefit of repairing clinical varicocele in infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). The surgically obtained sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and pregnancy rates following assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the use of retrieved testicular sperm were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included the presence of viable sperm in postoperative ejaculate to avoid the testicular sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates (both assisted and unassisted) using postoperative ejaculated sperm. An electronic search to collect the data was performed using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until April 2015. Eighteen studies were included in this systematic review and accounted for 468 patients who were diagnosed with NOA and varicocele. These patients were subjected to either surgical varicocele repair or percutaneous embolization. Three controlled studies evaluating sperm retrieval outcomes indicated that in patients who underwent varicocelectomy, SRR increased compared to those without varicocele repair (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.69–4.14; P < 0.001). Although pregnancy rates with the use of testicular sperm favored the varicocelectomy group, results were not statistically significant (clinical pregnancy rate OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 0.92–4.65; P = 0.08; live birth rate OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 0.99–4.83; P = 0.05). The remaining fifteen studies reported postoperative semen analysis results. In 43.9% of the patients (range: 20.8%–55.0%), sperm were found in postoperative ejaculates. Pregnancy rates for unassisted and assisted (after IVF/ICSI) were 13.6% and 18.9% in the group of men with sperm in postoperative ejaculates, respectively. Our findings indicate that varicocelectomy in patients with NOA and clinical varicocele is associated with improved SRR. In addition, approximately 44% of the treated men will have enough sperm in the ejaculate to avoid sperm retrieval. Limited data on pregnancy outcomes with both postoperative ejaculated sperm and harvested testicular sperm preclude any firm conclusion with regard to the possible increased fertility potential in treated individuals. In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that infertile men with NOA and clinical varicocele benefit from varicocelectomy. Given the low/moderate quality of evidence available, it is advisable that doctors discuss with their patients with NOA the risks and benefits of varicocele repair.

The development of surgical sperm extraction and new challenges to improve the outcome

Surgical sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has become widespread worldwide and is regarded as the sole option for patients with azoospermia. However, the sperm retrieval rate remains unsatisfactorily low, particularly for men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Therefore, the technical challenges associated with improving the sperm retrieval rate for men with NOA are being addressed. The most successful method developed to date is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), which is rapidly becoming recognized as a useful technique due to its relatively high sperm retrieval rate and low complication rate. However, even with micro-TESE, the sperm retrieval rate for men with NOA remains at 30-60 %, with an even lower birth rate. The technical challenges associated with improving the outcomes of surgical sperm extraction are being approached through the use of ultrasound and optimal surgical devices such as narrow band imaging, multiphoton microscopy, and optical coherent tomography. In addition to the difficulties related to searching for sperm, medical treatments that induce spermatogenesis remain controversial. For example, varicocele repair prior to surgical sperm extraction and hormonal therapy before and after TESE have been extensively examined. We herein briefly summarized the development process in surgical sperm extraction up to the present and technical challenges to improve the outcomes of surgical sperm extraction.

Varicocele Repair Improves Testicular Histology in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia

Objective. To determine the histopathological differences after varicocele repair in testicular tissue in males with nonobstructive azoospermia. Methods. Between 2009 and 2014, 45 men with complete azoospermia and palpable varicocele, presenting with primary infertility of at least 1 year, undergoing varicocele repair at our institution were selected for the study. A standard systematic testicular 6-core Tru-Cut biopsy was performed during varicocele repair. Other biopsies were obtained from each testicle of all patients at the time of microscopic sperm extraction procedure. Results. Nineteen patients were selected for the study. Testicular biopsy specimens were classified as Sertoli cell only on preoperative histopathological analysis in 14 patients. After varicocele repair, focal spermatogenesis (n = 3) and late maturation arrest (n = 2) were found in these patients. Average Johnsen score was significantly increased after varicocelectomy (P = 0.003). Motile sperm was found in one patient on postoperative semen analyses and in 10 more patients in the microscopic sperm extraction procedure. Preoperative high serum follicle stimulating hormone level and venous reflux were significantly and negatively correlated with the increase in average Johnsen score (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Our findings suggest significant improvement in testicular histology after varicocele repair.

Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment

PURPOSE

Varicocele repair in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was occasionally associated to ejaculated spermatozoa independently from clinical and laboratory measures. We performed a prospective study in infertile men affected by NOA and left side varicocele to find whether or not the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after varicocele repair is predicted by baseline measures.

METHODS

Patients with NOA and grade II, or grade III left side varicocele were submitted to hormone analysis and to scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDU). Azoospermia was confirmed in 23 patients aged 25-47 years who were than submitted to varicocele repair through a retrograde internal spermatic vein embolization. Patients were re-evaluated after 6 months.

RESULTS

Six months after varicocele repair 12 patients (52.2 %) were still azoospermic (Group 1) while 11 patients (47.8 %) reported ejaculated spermatozoa (Group 2) [sperm count: 1.3 × 10(6)/mL; 0.5 × 10(6)/mL-1.6 × 10(6)/mL (median 25th-75th centiles)]. Serum baseline FSH was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.012), while no differences between groups were revealed for all other clinical and laboratory parameters. ROC analysis indicated that baseline FSH level predicted the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment [AUC = 0.811; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.6-0.9; p = 0.0029]. A cut-off level of FSH <10.06 mIU/mL identified 82.0 % of cases with ejaculated spermatozoa with a specificity of 81.8 % and a sensitivity of 83.3 %.

CONCLUSION

Selected patients with NOA may show ejaculated spermatozoa after a non-invasive repair of a left side varicocele, therefore avoiding testicular sperm extraction. Baseline serum FSH was a valuable predictor for ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

Varicocele-caused progressive damage in bilateral testis and sertoli cell-only syndrome in homolateral testis in rats

Background

We aimed to investigate whether varicocele (VC) in rats can cause Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS).

Material/Methods

Forty adolescent SD rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: 4-weeks control group, 4-weeks experimental group, 12-weeks control group, and 12-weeks experimental group. Left varicocele models were introduced by partially ligating left kidney veins for the experimental groups, and the sham surgery groups as controls were executed with exactly the same surgery as in the experimental groups except for the ligation. Rats in control and experimental groups for 4 and 12 weeks were killed after laparotomy at 4 and 12 weeks, respectively, the testes were taken out and fixed in fixative containing 4% polyformaldehyde, then were stained by hematoxylin and eosin (HE). The density and viability of sperm were analyzed by computer-aided sperm analysis.

Results

Compared with rats in 4-weeks and 12-weeks control group, histological structures of bilateral testes in both experimental groups were impaired, most of them showing as focal focuses. The pathological changes of testes in rats of the 12-weeks experimental group were bilateral, and included atrophy of seminiferous tubules, turbulence of spermatogenic cells in seminiferous tubules, defluvium of most spermatogenic cells, abortion of spermatogenesis, and degradation of spermatogenic epithelia. One rat in the 12-weeks experimental group was shown having SCOS, with the spermatogenic cells in seminiferous tubules completely flaked, degraded, or absent, and only Sertoli cells lined the seminiferous tubules.

Conclusions

Laboratory VC caused progressive impairment of homolateral testes, and SCOS could be induced when the damage was severe. Our results indicate that asthenozoospermia, azoospermia, and SCOS can be prevented by the earlier treatment of VC.

Review of Azoospermia

Azoospermia is classified as obstructive azoospermia (OA) or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), each having very different etiologies and treatments. The etiology, diagnosis, and management of azoospermia were reviewed and relevant literature summarized. Differentiation between these two etiologies is of paramount importance and is contingent upon thorough history and physical examination and indicated laboratory/genetic testing. OA occurs secondary to obstruction of the male reproductive tract, and is diagnosed through a combination of history/physical examination, laboratory testing, genetics (CFTR for congenital OA), and imaging studies. NOA (which includes primary testicular failure and secondary testicular failure) is differentiated from OA by clinical assessment (testis consistency/volume), laboratory testing (FSH), and genetic testing (karyotype, Y chromosome microdeletion, or specific genetic testing for hypogonadotropic hypogonadism). For obstructive azoospermia, management includes microsurgical reconstruction when feasible using microsurgical vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) is utilized for those cases not amenable to reconstruction. NOA management includes medical management for congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and microdissection testicular sperm extraction with IVF/ICSI for appropriate candidates based on laboratory/genetic testing. Overall, this important review provides an updated summary of the most recent available literature describing etiology, diagnosis, and management of azoospermia.

Azoospermia due to spermatogenic failure

This article summarizes the current literature regarding azoospermia caused by spermatogenic failure. The causes and genetic contributions to spermatogenic failure are reviewed. Medical therapies including use of hormonal manipulation, whether guided by a specific abnormality or empiric, to induce spermatogenesis are discussed. The role of surgical therapy, including a discussion of varicocelectomy in men with spermatogenic failure, as well as an in-depth review of surgical sperm retrieval with testicular sperm extraction and microdissection testicular sperm extraction, is provided. Finally, future directions of treatment for men with spermatogenic failure are discussed, namely, stem cell and gene therapy.

Varicocele repair for nonobstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the role of varicocelectomy in the management of patients with varicoceles and nonobstructive azoospermia and to review predictors of successful outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several small, retrospective, noncontrolled studies have documented return of sperm to the ejaculate in up to 56% of men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) following varicocele repair. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis has reported a 6% spontaneous pregnancy rate in amongst NOA patients who underwent varicocele repair, regardless of surgical technique. Although these observations are promising, evidence for whether or not varicocele repair significantly improves spermatogenesis within an impaired testicle is conflicting. No clear predictors of success following varicocele repair have been identified, but a certain level of spermatogenesis on testicular biopsy appears to be necessary for a desirable outcome after varicocele repair.

SUMMARY

The role of varicocelectomy for the treatment on NOA is controversial. Prospective, controlled studies are needed in order to define the true benefit of varicocele repair in men with NOA, in terms of improvement in semen parameters, testicular sperm retrieval rates, and pregnancy outcomes.

The role of varicocele treatment in the management of non-obstructive azoospermia

The literature on male reproductive medicine is continually expanding, especially regarding the diagnosis and treatment of infertility due to non-obstructive azoospermia. The advent of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has dramatically improved the treatment of male infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia. Assisted reproduction using testicular spermatozoa has become a treatment of hope for men previously thought to be incapable of fathering a child due to testicular failure. In addition, numerous studies on non-obstructive azoospermia have reported that varicocelectomy not only can induce spermatogenesis but can also increase the sperm retrieval rate; however, the value of varicocelectomy in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia still remains controversial. The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the current status of varicocele repair in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Alternate indications for varicocele repair: non-obstructive azoospermia, pain, androgen deficiency and progressive testicular dysfunction

Varicocele repair is indicated for infertile men with clinical varicoceles. Some men with scrotal pain, low testosterone, non-obstructive azoospermia, and who are at risk for testicular dysfunction may also benefit from varicocelectomy.

Scrotal infrared digital thermography in assessment of varicocele--pilot study to assess diagnostic criteria

The aim of this study was to assess scrotal thermography in diagnostics of varicocele and suggest potential diagnostic criteria. Twelve patients with clinically diagnosed varicocele were examined with scrotal infrared digital thermography, physical examination and ultrasound/doppler. The main outcome measure was evaluation of thermography diagnostic criteria for varicocele. Mean temperature at left pampiniform plexus was ≥ 34 °C in 83%, and at right pampiniform plexus in all cases was ≤ 34 °C. In 92% of patients, temperature at the left testicle was ≥ 32 °C, whereas at the right testicle it was >32 °C in 50% patients. Temperatures between left and right pampiniform plexus and between left and right testicle were significantly different with P < 0.0001 and P < 0.006 respectively. In all patients, temperature difference between pampiniform plexuses was ≥ 0.6 °C. In 92% of patients, temperature at left pampiniform plexus was equal or higher to thigh temperature with the mean temperature difference of 1.1 ± 1.1 °C. Temperature at right pampiniform plexus was colder than the thigh in 92% of patients. This study suggests diagnostic criteria of five thermographic signs to easily diagnose varicocele. Scrotal thermography presents feasible, short and low cost diagnostic method for varicocele. Further study on a larger number of patients and healthy participants is needed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of this method.

Predictors of sperm recovery and azoospermia relapse in men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair

PURPOSE

In this study we determined the recoverability and sustainability of motile sperm in semen of men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocelectomy as related to different variables.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with documented infertility for more than 1 year, with nonobstructive azoospermia and clinically palpable varicoceles were included in this prospective noncontrolled study. Participants underwent simultaneous subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy and testicular biopsies. Preoperative as well as initial and late followup semen analyses were performed. Outcomes of sperm recovery and relapse of azoospermia were correlated with the variables of patient age, infertility duration, varicocele grade, laterality, follicle-stimulating hormone, testicular volume and testicular histology.

RESULTS

The study included 31 men with a mean ± SD age of 34.9 ± 8.7 years and mean followup of 19.3 ± 3.3 months. Hypospermatogenesis, late maturation arrest, early maturation arrest and Sertoli-cell-only were observed in 13, 6, 2 and 10 patients, respectively. Overall, sperm recovery was evident in 10 of 31 (32.3%) patients (persistent recovery 19.4%, intermittent recovery 6.5%, relapse 6.5%). Sperm were recovered in patients with hypospermatogenesis (7 of 13, 53.8%) and late maturation arrest (3 of 6, 50%). No sperm were recovered in those with early maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only. Among the variables only histological patterns demonstrated a significant correlation with recovery (rho = 0.504, p = 0.004). None of variables was significantly correlated with relapse. Bilateral varicocele repair demonstrated a strong yet nonsignificant negative correlation with relapse (rho = -0.612, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Varicocelectomy could recover motile sperm in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, palpable varicoceles and hypospermatogenesis or late maturation arrest. No sperm was recovered with early maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only. Recovery might be persistent or intermittent, or involve relapse of azoospermia. Testicular histology was the sole parameter significantly correlated with recovery and no predictors of relapse could be identified. This prognostic role of testicular biopsy is imperative in couple counseling.

The role of varicocele sclerotherapy in men with severe oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia

The aim of this study was to verify the role of antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicoceles in infertile men with severe oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia (OAT). The 59 patients with severe OAT in this study underwent antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicoceles. The outcome was assessed in terms of improvement in semen parameters and spontaneous conception rate. Semen parameters and reproductive hormones were evaluated before antegrade sclerotherapy (AS) and 6 months after AS. After an average follow-up time of 34.8±3.2 months, significant improvement was noted in the mean sperm concentration, motility and morphology in 36 patients (61%). Spontaneous pregnancy occurred in nine couples (15%). Six months after treatment, inhibin B levels were significantly higher (P<0.04), whereas follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were significantly lower (P<0.001) than before treatment. Antegrade internal spermatic vein sclerotherapy can significantly improve seminal parameters and hormonal parameters in men with severe OAT and may even result in spontaneous pregnancy in couples who would otherwise be candidates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Azoospermia and maturation arrest: malfunction of valves in erect poster of humans leads to hypoxia in sperm production site

Maturation arrest (MA) of spermatogenesis is diagnosed on histology as interruption of spermatogenesis before the final stage without impairment of Sertoli or Leydig cells. It is considered a condition of irreversible or absolute infertility. Varicocele, which represents impairment in the testicular venous drainage system, has been shown to be a bilateral disease. Malfunction of the valves increase the hydrostatic pressure in the testicular venous system that exceeds the pressure in the arterial system leading to hypoxia in the testicular microcirculation and in the seminiferous tubules, the sperm production site. Sperm production deteriorates, and ultimately progresses to azoospermia. Our prediction was that MA, if genetic factors are excluded, is the final stage of long standing hypoxia. This would indicate that MA is not always an independent disease entity, but may represent progressive process of deterioration of the testicular parenchyma beyond azoospermia. By histology and electron microscopy, our prediction confirmed, at least partially, that MA is associated with degenerative ischaemic changes in the seminiferous tubules. Adequate treatment of bilateral varicocele by microsurgery or super-selective sclerotherapy of the internal spermatic veins including associated network of venous bypasses, vertically oriented, may resume the flow of oxygenated blood. If irreversible damages did not occur and ischaemia is not too long standing, limited sperm production may be restored, at least partially.

Varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiple small case series have reported sperm in the ejaculate and spontaneous pregnancies in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair. We hypothesized that men with favorable testicular histopathology on testis biopsy such as maturation arrest or hypospermatogenesis would have a higher probability of success than those with more ablative pathology, eg Sertoli-cell-only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the literature on varicocele repair in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia was performed and 11 publications from the previous 20 years were evaluated. Histopathological data were presented in 8 publications, and were categorized as Sertoli-cell-only, maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis. Maturation arrest was further differentiated by 4 publications. Early maturation arrest was defined as maturation ending at the secondary spermatocyte and late maturation arrest was defined as maturation ending at the spermatid without spermatozoa present. Success after repair was defined as having sperm in the ejaculate or spontaneous pregnancy.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were analyzed. After varicocele repair 91 (39.1%) patients had motile sperm in the ejaculate and 14 spontaneous pregnancies were reported. Success rates in patients with maturation arrest (42.1%) or hypospermatogenesis (54.5%) were significantly higher than in those with Sertoli-cell-only (11.3%, p <0.001 in both groups). Patients with late maturation arrest had a higher probability of success (45.8%) than those with early maturation arrest (0%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia can have improvement in semen analysis and achieve spontaneous pregnancy after repair of clinical varicoceles. This meta-analysis demonstrates that men with late maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis have a higher probability of success and, therefore, histopathology should be considered before varicocele repair in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.

Embolization of varicocles: pretreatment sperm motility predicts later pregnancy in partners of infertile men

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of future pregnancy in partners of infertile men undergoing embolization of varicoceles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted within local institutional review board guidelines, and written informed consent was obtained. In 223 clinically infertile men (age range, 18-50 years) with varicoceles and associated oligoteratoasthenospermia, endovascular embolization of the spermatic veins was performed with distal coil embolization and sclerotherapy. Additional anti-inflammatory treatment was initiated if required. Baseline clinical examination, semen specimen, and hormone level findings were compared to follow-up data. Posttreatment pregnancy rate of their healthy female partners was assessed with a standardized questionnaire. Unconditioned logistic regression was used to identify factors among all available clinical and laboratory data predicting treatment success (sired pregnancy during follow-up).

RESULTS

A total of 226 of 228 varicoceles in 223 patients were successfully treated. Resolution of varicoceles at clinical examination and ultrasonography (US) was observed in 206 patients (92.4%). Three-month follow-up semen analysis in these patients showed significant improvement in sperm motility (P < .001) and sperm count (P < .001); however, average values remained in the abnormal range (World Health Organization guidelines). In 173 patients, follow-up data were successfully obtained, with pregnancy reported in 45 (26%). Baseline sperm motility was identified as the only significant pretreatment factor (standardized regression coefficient beta = 3.285, t = 7.560, P = .006) predicting sired pregnancy. Hormone levels, clinical grading of varicoceles, Doppler US findings, and other semen parameters did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Sperm motility prior to varicocele treatment in infertile men is an important predictor of later pregnancy.

Results of varicocelectomy in patients with isolated teratozoospermia

INTRODUCTION

Isolated teratozoospermia is rarely encountered in patients with clinically palpable varicocele, and the consequences of varicocelectomy remain unclear in these cases. In the current study, we assessed the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm morphology in a series of patients with infertility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data obtained from 52 primary subfertile men with isolated teratozoospermia and clinical palpable varicocele were reviewed retrospectively. Varicocelectomy was performed on 29 patients, and the remaining 23 patients did not undergo any treatment (control group). The differences in sperm morphology assessed by using Kruger's strict criteria 3 months before and 12 months after varicocelectomy were taken into consideration for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

One patient who underwent varicocelectomy was excluded from the study due to varicocele recurrence. Thus, data obtained from the remaining 28 patients were evaluated. Following varicocelectomy, significant improvement was detected in the ratio of normal sperm forms (p < 0.001). While there was significant improvement in the ratio of sperm cells with head defects, tail defects and immature forms (p < 0.001), the ratio of sperm with acrosome and mid-piece defects was not changed (p > 0.05). While an overall spontaneous pregnancy was achieved in 5 of the 28 (17.8%) couples in the varicocelectomy group within 12 months after operation, neither improvement in sperm morphology nor pregnancy in the patients' partners was detected in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Varicocelectomy caused a significant improvement in sperm morphology, particularly in immature forms and forms with head and tail defects evaluated by Kruger's classification.