Characterization of cheW genes of Leptospira interrogans and their effects in Escherichia coli

Two Agrobacterium tumefaciens CheW Proteins Are Incorporated into One Chemosensory Pathway with Different Efficiencies

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the agent that causes crown gall tumor disease on more than 140 species of dicotyledonous plants. Chemotaxis of A. tumefaciens toward the wound sites of the host plant is the first step to recognize the host. CheW is a coupling protein that bridges the histidine kinase CheA and the chemoreceptors to form the chemotaxis core signaling complex and plays a crucial role in the assembly and function of the large chemosensory array. Unlike all previously reported chemotaxis systems, A. tumefaciens has only one major che operon but two cheW homologs (atu2075 as cheW₁ and atu2617 as cheW₂) on unlinked loci. The in-frame deletion of either cheW gene significantly affects A. tumefaciens chemotaxis but does not abolish the chemotaxis, unless both cheW genes were deleted. The effect of cheW₂ deletion on the chemotaxis is more severe than that of cheW₁ deletion. Either CheW can interact with CheA and couple it to the cell poles. The promoter activity of cheW₂ is always higher than that of cheW₁ under all of the tested conditions. When two cheW genes were adjusted to the same expression level by using the identical promoter, the difference between the effects of two CheW proteins on the chemotaxis still existed. Therefore, we envision that both the different molecular ratio of two CheW proteins in cell and the different affinities of two CheW proteins with CheA and chemoreceptors result in the efficiency difference of two CheW proteins in functioning in the large chemosensory array.

Genetic and molecular biological characterization of two homologous cheR genes from Leptospira interrogans

The Leptospira interrogans genome encodes two copies of cheR genes and each of them is able to complement for the swarming defective phenotype of Escherichia coli cheR null mutant RP1254 to certain extent, while over-expression of either of them inhibits the swarming of the chemotactic wild-type E. coli strain, RP437. Therefore, both CheR1 and CheR2 ought to bear the methyltransferase activities, although CheR1 has only one instead of two conserved basic amino acid residues located on the positively charged face of α2-helix. When this residue as well as the Lys48 and Arg55 of CheR2 was mutated, none of the CheRs was able to maintain aforementioned complementation functions, suggesting their critical roles in recognition of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins similar to that of E. coli. Demonstrated by microarray assay, the expression of cheR1 in L. interrogans cultured at 28°C in Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris medium was significantly lower than the average transcription level of all other genes, while the transcription of cheR2 was significantly higher than that of cheR1 in accordance with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. Tandem MS-MS data mining for the proteome of the same culture detected 16 peptides derived from CheR2 but none from CheR1. Therefore, although both genes were shown to be functional in E. coli, the structurally more conserved CheR2 rather than CheR1 might be the major functional component of L. interrogans chemotaxis adaptation system under our laboratory culture conditions.

The photosensor protein Ppr of Rhodocista centenaria is linked to the chemotaxis signalling pathway

Background

Rhodocista centenaria is a phototrophic α-proteobacterium exhibiting a phototactic behaviour visible as colony movement on agar plates directed to red light. As many phototrophic purple bacteria R. centenaria possesses a soluble photoactive yellow protein (Pyp). It exists as a long fusion protein, designated Ppr, consisting of three domains, the Pyp domain, a putative bilin binding domain (Bbd) and a histidine kinase domain (Pph). The Ppr protein is involved in the regulation of polyketide synthesis but it is still unclear, how this is connected to phototaxis and chemotaxis.

Results

To elucidate the possible role of Ppr and Pph in the chemotactic network we studied the interaction with chemotactic proteins in vitro as well as in vivo. Matrix-assisted coelution experiments were performed to study the possible communication of the different putative binding partners. The kinase domain of the Ppr protein was found to interact with the chemotactic linker protein CheW. The formation of this complex was clearly ATP-dependent. Further results indicated that the Pph histidine kinase domain and CheW may form a complex with the chemotactic kinase CheAY suggesting a role of Ppr in the chemotaxis signalling pathway. In addition, when Ppr or Pph were expressed in Escherichia coli, the chemotactic response of the cells was dramatically affected.

Conclusions

The Ppr protein of Rhodocista centenaria directly interacts with the chemotactic protein CheW. This suggests a role of the Ppr protein in the regulation of the chemotactic response in addition to its role in chalcone synthesis.

Cloning and characterization of three cheB genes in Leptospira interrogans

Motility and chemotaxis systems are critical for the virulence of leptospires. There were multiple copies of putative chemotaxis homologs located at leptospires large chromosome. CheB1 and CheB3 from Leptospira interrogans strain Lai are predicted to have a global CheB-like domain, but CheB2 is predicted to have a C-terminal effector domain only. In order to verify the function of three putative cheB genes, they were cloned into pQE31 vector and then expressed, respectively, in wild-type Escherichia coli strain RP437 and cheB defective strain RP4972. The results of swarming assays and the predicted ternary structures of CheB1 and CheB3 of L. interrogans strain Lai suggested that the absence of an N-terminal regulatory domain may be one of the reasons for the failure of CheB2 to complement an E. coli cheB mutant. Furthermore, CheB2 links solely to CheR1 and CheR3 in the interaction network of leptospires. Taken together, these results indicated that CheB2 may not function alone, and under certain physiological conditions, it may require CheB3 and CheR1 to function. The existence of multiple copies of chemotaxis gene homologs suggested that L. interrogans strain Lai might have a more complex chemosensory pathway.

Characterization of the cheY genes from Leptospira interrogans and their effects on the behavior of Escherichia coli

The motility and chemotaxis system are critical for the virulence of pathogenic leptospire, which enable them to penetrate host tissue barriers during infection. The completed genome sequence of a representative virulent serovar type strain (Lai) of Leptospira interrogans serogroups Icterohaemorrhagiae (L. interrogans strain Lai) suggested that there were multiple copies of putative chemotaxis homologues located at its large chromosome. In order to verify the function of these proteins, the putative cheY genes were cloned into pQE31 vector and then expressed, respectively, in wild-type Escherichia coli strain RP437 and cheY defective strain RP5232. The results showed that all the five cheYs could restore the swarming of RP5232 strain to some extend. Overexpression of CheYs in RP437 showed inhibited swarming of RP437. To investigate the mechanism of chemotaxis signaling in L. interrogans strain Lai, certain aspartates (Asp-53, Asp-61, Asp-70, Asp-62, and Asp-66 for L. interrogans strain Lai CheY1, CheY2, CheY3, CheY4, and CheY5, respectively) were mutated. Expression of these mutated cheYs manifested neither restoration of the swarming ability of RP5232 nor inhibition on swarming ability of RP437. Multiple amino acid sequence alignment predicted ternary structures and the result of mutation experiment suggested that these conserved aspartate residues of L. interrogans were analogous to that in E. coli CheY in function and structure. So, L. interrogans and E. coli may have similar mechanisms of activation of the chemotaxis phosphorelay pathway, but there are differences in their control by signal terminator.