An intervention to change the approach to colorectal cancer screening in primary care

Colorectal Cancer Screening Practices Among Texas Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

The purpose of this study was two-fold: (1) To describe and compare Texas Nurse Practitioners' and Physician Assistants' knowledge and use of current screening guidelines for individuals at varying risk for colorectal cancer and (2) to compare their recommendations for referral for genetic counseling for persons at increased risk for colorectal or endometrial cancer. The study used a descriptive correlational comparative design. A self-administered web-based survey was sent to the members of the Texas Nurse Practitioner Association and the Texas Academy of Physician Assistants. The questionnaire consisted of 44 items categorized in three domains: demographics, knowledge of national guidelines for risk-stratified colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, and referral for genetic counseling and CRC-screening practices. Data were collected from July through October 2014. More than 75% of the survey respondents reported confidence in their knowledge of the lifetime risk of colorectal cancer and the recommendations for screening in the average-risk adult. Fifty-one percent of both groups reported that they were familiar with Lynch syndrome; however, the nurse practitioners had a lower awareness of the lifetime risk of colorectal cancer associated with Lynch syndrome compared to the physician assistants. Only 34.1% of the nurse practitioners and 23.5% of the physician assistants were aware of the lifetime risk of developing endometrial cancer diagnosed before 60 years of age in women with Lynch syndrome, and only 39.6% of the physician assistants and 40% of the nurse practitioners reported performing a three-generation family history of cancer as a risk assessment. Less than 50% of the respondents would refer a patient with a personal or family history of colorectal or endometrial cancer diagnosed before the age of 60 years for genetic counseling. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in primary care need more formal and continuing education in risk-stratified screening and referral for genetic counseling in adults at increased risk for colorectal cancer. The academic curricula of both disciplines need to include more content on genetic and genomic influences on the pathophysiology of colorectal cancer and the role of this information for screening and personalized treatment.

Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits

BACKGROUND

The objective was to conduct a systematic review of toolkit evaluations intended to spread interventions to improve healthcare quality. We aimed to determine the components, uptake, and effectiveness of publicly available toolkits.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and the Web of Science from 2005 to May 2018 for evaluations of publicly available toolkits, used a forward search of known toolkits, screened references, and contacted topic experts. Two independent reviewers screened publications for inclusion. One reviewer abstracted data and appraised the studies, checked by a second reviewer; reviewers resolved disagreements through discussion. Findings, summarized in comprehensive evidence tables and narrative synthesis addressed the uptake and utility, procedural and organizational outcomes, provider outcomes, and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 77 studies evaluating 72 toolkits met inclusion criteria. Toolkits addressed a variety of quality improvement approaches and focused on clinical topics such as weight management, fall prevention, vaccination, hospital-acquired infections, pain management, and patient safety. Most toolkits included introductory and implementation material (e.g., research summaries) and healthcare provider tools (e.g., care plans), and two-thirds included material for patients (e.g., information leaflets). Pre-post studies were most common (55%); 10% were single hospital evaluations and the number of participating staff ranged from 17 to 704. Uptake data were limited and toolkit uptake was highly variable. Studies generally indicated high satisfaction with toolkits, but the perceived usefulness of individual tools varied. Across studies, 57% reported on adherence to clinical procedures and toolkit effects were positive. Provider data were reported in 40% of studies but were primarily self-reported changes. Only 29% reported patient data and, overall, results from robust study designs are missing from the evidence base.

CONCLUSIONS

The review documents publicly available toolkits and their components. Available uptake data are limited but indicate variability. High satisfaction with toolkits can be achieved but the usefulness of individual tools may vary. The existing evidence base on the effectiveness of toolkits remains limited. While emerging evidence indicates positive effects on clinical processes, more research on toolkit value and what affects it is needed, including linking toolkits to objective provider behavior measures and patient outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014013930 .

Insure Me Cancer Free: An Intervention Utilizing a Dynamic Communication Model

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of a pilot insurance company-based intervention guided by a Dynamic Communication Model to increase breast and colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian WV, a medically-underserved population with low screening rates. Our team and key informants developed letters and a website to promote cancer screening, and these were mailed to patients needing screening (breast: n = 232; colorectal: n = 324). After 6 months, a sample of women (n = 22) and men (n = 27) continuing to need screening received telephonic case management counseling. Screening rates were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. A final telephone interview was conducted at 12 months with a subset of participants. Key informants (n = 21) provided feedback on the letter/website, resulting in improved readability, organization, and informational content. The letter/website had minimal impact on screening (breast: n = 8; colon: n = 5). The final telephone interview of plan members (n = 12) found they liked the personalized approach and appreciated learning more about cancer, and that you need to "catch it early for good treatment." All understood the counseling and believed the information was correct. Nearly all intended to get screened. Following counseling, screening numbers increased (total breast: n = 39; total colon: n = 18). Our theoretically-driven, case management counseling intervention was well received and has the potential to increase cancer screening rates, particularly in a rural, medically-underserved populations.

Implementing Colon Cancer Screening Guidelines Into the Primary Care Setting

Colon cancer is the second leading cause of all cancers deaths. Despite public awareness, many healthcare providers and patients remain uninformed about colon cancer screening options alternative to colonoscopy. Research supports the lack of providers' education and patient knowledge. At a clinic for veterans in Central Florida, 2 educational presentations were delivered to primary care providers (N = 46) on the clinical pathway for colon cancer screening options. A pilot study with a quantitative pretest-post-test design was used to evaluate differences between screening orders 3 months before and after the presentations. A 10-item survey on the usefulness of the educational information was also administered to providers. Results of a 1-way analysis of variance indicated no significant differences between the two 3-month periods. However, with exclusion of the lowest month, a significance level resulted of .087, 91.3% confidence level. Survey responses indicated a positive impact, with most answers ranging from agree to strongly agree. The study revealed that the educational clinical pathway contributed to providers' increased recommendations of screening options and the educational information was useful. Additional research is recommended on the effectiveness of education and providers' use of screening options for colon cancer for average-risk veterans in healthcare institutions.

Web-Based Study for Improving Mammography Among Korean American Women

Web-based culture-specific interventions for Korean American (KA) women to improve mammography utilization are not available. An established intervention developed to improve mammography utilizations for Korean American (KA) women was tested via the Web for its efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability. A randomized controlled trial, with a pretest-posttest control group design, was conducted with 136 KA women and their spouses. Intention to have a mammogram within the next 12 months increased significantly in the intervention group compare to controls. Among women whose mammograms had not been updated, 22 % of women in the intervention and 13 % of women in the control group obtained a mammogram at 2-month post-baseline, even though the difference was not statistically significant. The Web-based study educating couples was feasible and could improve KA women's breast cancer screening intention and behaviors. Combining off-line contact for recruitment/data collection with online intervention material could decrease the attrition rate in the future study because the attrition rate in this study was higher than the original study.

Effectiveness of three interventions to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening varies widely among different countries and different socio-demographic groups. Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of three primary-care interventions to increase CRC screening participation among persons over the age of 50 years and to identify the health and socio-demographic-related factors that determine greater participation.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized experimental study with only one post-test control group. A total of 1,690 subjects were randomly distributed into four groups: written briefing; telephone briefing; an invitation to attend a group meeting; and no briefing. Subjects were evaluated 2 years post-intervention, with the outcome variable being participation in CRC screening.

RESULTS

A total of 1,129 subjects were interviewed. Within the groups, homogeneity was tested in terms of socio-demographic characteristics and health-related variables. The proportion of subjects who participated in screening was: 15.4% in the written information group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.2-19.7); 28.8% in the telephone information group (95% CI: 23.6-33.9); 8.1% in the face-to-face information group (95% CI: 4.5-11.7); and 5.9% in the control group (95% CI: 2.9-9.0), with this difference proving statistically significant (p < 0.001). Logistic regression showed that only interventions based on written or telephone briefing were effective. Apart from type of intervention, number of reported health problems and place of residence remained in the regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Both written and telephone information can serve to improve participation in CRC screening. This preventive activity could be optimized by means of simple interventions coming within the scope of primary health-care professionals.

The Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse in the Academic Setting

OBJECTIVES

To explore how advanced practice nurses implement practice change in academic medical centers to support optimal patient and staff outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Published peer reviewed literature, web-based resources, and professional society materials.

CONCLUSION

Cancer care is rapidly evolving and advanced practice nurses can shape the future of how care is delivered as well as the setting it is delivered in.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Advanced practice oncology nurses (Nurse Practitioners and Clinical Nurse Specialists) have an opportunity to significantly shape the patient experience by implementing programmatic changes across the continuum of care by engaging stakeholders in project design. Knowledge of change management and implementation science is critical to success.

Factors influencing participation in colorectal screening

Participation of the target population in coloretal screening is generally low. In addition to demographic and socio-economic factors, the health care system and- in particular – family doctors play an important role. Further, the rate of participation is influenced by psychological, cognitive and behavioural factors, too. The paper analyses factors related to colorectal screening behaviour and potential interventions designed to screening uptake. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(27), 1051–1056.

Impact of procedure volumes and focused practice on short-term outcomes of elective and urgent colon cancer resection in Italy

BACKGROUND

The relationship between hospital volumes and short-term patients' outcomes of colon cancer (CC) surgery is not well established in the literature. Moreover, evidence about short-term outcomes of urgent compared with elective CC procedures is scanty. The aims of this study are 1) to determine whether caseloads and other hospital characteristics are associated with short-term outcomes of CC surgery; 2) to compare the outcomes of urgent and elective CC surgery.

METHODS

A total of 14,200 patients undergoing CC surgery between 2005 and 2010 in the General Surgery Units (GSUs) of the hospitals of Emilia-Romagna region, Northern Italy, were identified from the hospital discharge records database. The outcomes of interest were 30-day in-hospital mortality, re-intervention and 30-day re-admission. Using multilevel analysis, we analyzed the relationship of GSU volumes and focused practice, defined as the percentage of CC operations over total operations, with the three outcomes.

RESULTS

High procedure volumes were associated with a lower risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality, after adjusting for patients' characteristics [aOR (95% CI) = 0.51 (0.33-0.81)]. Stratified analyses for elective and urgent surgery showed that high volumes were associated with a lower 30-day mortality for elective patients [aOR (95% CI) = 0.35 (0.17-0.71)], but not for urgent patients [aOR (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.42-1.24)]. Focused practice was an independent predictor of re-intervention [aOR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.47-0.97)] and re-admission [aRR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.78-0.98)].

CONCLUSIONS

The present study adds evidence in support of the notion that patients with CC undergoing surgery at high-volume and focused surgical units experience better short-term outcomes.