Nimbalkar S, Shukla VV, Chauhan V, Phatak A, Patel D, Chapla A, Nimbalkar A. Blinded randomized crossover trial: Skin-to-skin care vs. sucrose for preterm neonatal pain.
J Perinatol 2020;
40:896-901. [PMID:
32152488 DOI:
10.1038/s41372-020-0638-9]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare skin-to-skin care (SSC) and oral sucrose for preterm neonatal pain control.
METHODS
Preterm neonates (28-36 weeks gestation) requiring heel-stick were eligible. In group-A, SSC was given 15-min before first heel-stick, and sucrose was given 2-min before second heel-stick. In group-B, the sequence was reversed. Blinded premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score assessment was done at 0, 1, and 5-min of heel-stick by two assessors.
RESULTS
A hundred neonates were enrolled. The inter-rater agreement for the PIPP score was good. The behavior state component was significantly lower in the sucrose group at all assessment points. The mean (SD) difference between 1-min and 0 min was similar [SSC 3.58(3.16) vs. sucrose 4.09(3.82), p = 0.24] between groups. The PIPP score attained baseline values at 5-min in both groups.
CONCLUSION
Albeit sucrose indicated instantaneous action, SSC and sucrose have comparable clinical efficacy for preterm neonatal pain control. Multisensory stimulation with SSC may result in a higher behavioral state component of the PIPP score.
Collapse