Tonic supraspinal mechanisms influencing the intestino--intestinal inhibitory reflex

Neural mechanisms involved in the delay of gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit of liquid after thoracic spinal cord transection in awake rats

Spinal cord transection (SCT) delays gastric emptying (GE), and intestinal and gastrointestinal (GI) transit of liquid in awake rats. This study evaluates the neural mechanisms involved in this phenomenon. Male Wistar rats (N = 147) were fasted for 16 h and had the left jugular vein cannulated followed by laminectomy or laminectomy + complete SCT between T4 and T5 vertebrae. The next day, a test meal (1.5 ml of a phenol red solution, 0.5 mg/ml in 5% glucose) was administered by gavage feeding and 10 min later cervical dislocation was performed. Dye recovery in the stomach, and proximal, mid and distal small intestine was determined by spectrophotometry. SCT inhibited GE and GI transit since it increased gastric recovery by 71.3% and decreased mid small intestine recovery by 100% (P < 0.05). Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, celiac ganglionectomy + section of the splanchnic nerves, i.v. hexamethonium (20 mg/kg) or yohimbine (3 mg/kg) prevented the development of the SCT effect on GE and GI transit. Pretreatment with i.v. naloxone (2 mg/kg), L-NAME (3 mg/kg) or propranolol (2 mg/kg) was ineffective. Bilateral adrenalectomy or guanethidine (10 mg/kg) increased the magnitude of the GE inhibition, while i.v. prazosin (1 mg/kg) or atropine (0.5 mg/kg) decreased the magnitude but did not abolish the GE inhibition. In summary, the inhibition of GI motility observed 1 day after thoracic SCT in awake rats seems to involve vagal and possibly splanchnic pathways.

Modulation of gut perception in humans by spatial summation phenomena

1. We have recently shown that perception of intestinal stimuli increases by spatial summation phenomena. Our aim was to determine in humans whether intestinal perception depends on (a) the length of gut stimulated, and (b) the distance between stimuli. 2. In a first series of studies, we compared perception of isobaric intestinal distensions applied over a 3 cm segment and a 36 cm segment by means of two separate barostats (n = 8). In a second series of studies we compared perception of intestinal distensions applied simultaneously by two balloons sited 3, 12 or 48 cm apart (n = 6). 3. Distension of the 36 cm segment induced significantly greater perception than distension of the 3 cm intestinal segment (discomfort perceived at 20 +/- 2 mmHg and 31 +/- 2 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.05). Perception of intestinal balloon distension increased when a second stimulus was simultaneously applied, independently of the distance between the two balloons (the discomfort thresholds were 30 +/- 11, 20 +/- 6 and 28 +/- 7% lower with simultaneous distensions 3, 12 and 48 cm apart, respectively). 4. We conclude that perception of intestinal distension is determined by the extension of the field of stimulation, and the summation effect is similar whether adjacent or distant fields are stimulated.

The sympathetic nervous system modulates perception and reflex responses to gut distention in humans

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Intestinal distention induces perception and gut reflexes via sympathetic and vagal pathways, but the modulatory mechanisms of such responses remain obscure. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of sympathetic nervous activity on sympathetic and vagal reflexes as well as on intestinal and somatic perception.

METHODS

In 9 healthy volunteers, proximal duodenal distentions were produced in 4-mL increments and hand transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was produced in 3-mA increments. Increasing stimuli of 1-minute duration were randomly performed at 10-minute intervals both with and without sympathetic activation (induced by means of lower body negative pressure). Intestinal and somatic perception was scored by specific questionnaires; vagal enterogastric and sympathetic intestinointestinal relaxatory reflexes were simultaneously measured by gastric and distal duodenal barostats.

RESULTS

Sympathetic activation significantly heightened perception of intestinal distention without modifying perception of somatic stimuli (perception scores increased by 41% and -2%, respectively). The reflex responses to duodenal distention significantly increased during sympathetic activation both in the stomach and in the intestine (relaxation increased by 91% and 69%, respectively; P < 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system selectively increases visceral but not somatic sensitivity and enhances both vagally and sympathetically driven reflexes in the gut.