A mixed methods study investigating the quality of urinary and faecal continence assessment and management in residential aged care: Challenges, implications and solutions

OBJECTIVE

Incontinence is one of the main reasons for institutionalisation into residential aged care. It is linked with increased falls, skin breakdown, depression, social isolation and impaired quality of life. Studies over the past decade have demonstrated poor-quality incontinence care, which has led to ongoing development of best practice guidelines and educational resources. This study investigated current practices, and staff and resident experiences with continence assessment and management, in comparison with best practice guidelines.

METHODS

This concurrent mixed methods study was conducted in a 120-bed residential aged care home. Secondary analysis of data from clinical records provided a snapshot of how continence was assessed and managed. Semistructured interviews with four staff and five residents explored their experiences to understand the impact of current practice on resident emotional well-being. Mixing methods allowed for comparison between quantitative and qualitative findings, enabling a deeper understanding.

RESULTS

Findings from the two data sets were highly congruent and identified: (1) lack of communication with residents and family members about continence needs; (2) heavy reliance on product usage and limited other conservative strategies; (3) staff frustration at inability to respond to calls in a timely manner; and (4) positive staff-resident relationships protect resident emotional well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Current practices are not consistent with best practice guidelines, which raises the question as to why nothing has changed. We argue that a stronger focus on implementation underpinned by a relationship-centred approach is required to improve continence care practices among residential care staff, and the quality of life for adults living with incontinence.

Post-Cerebrovascular Accident Unpredictable Incontinence: A Qualitative Analysis of an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Team's Perspective

PURPOSE

This study investigates experiences of the interdisciplinary rehabilitation team in the treatment of patients with urinary incontinence after stroke.

DESIGN

A qualitative approach was chosen. Ten members of an interdisciplinary treatment team were interviewed in a neurological inpatient rehabilitation setting.

METHODS

Data were obtained via focus groups with nurses, physicians, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists in a rehabilitation clinic. The analysis followed the principles of qualitative content analysis.

FINDINGS

According to the interdisciplinary treatment team, professionals and patients prioritize incontinence treatment differently. Challenges surrounding collaboration, communication, structural conditions, and the perception of intervention success were identified as barriers to promoting continence.

CONCLUSION

To overcome this discrepancy in treatment priority, awareness of poststroke urinary incontinence must be improved.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A key component is communication about urinary incontinence with patients and among team members.

Urinary incontinence and its management in patients aged 65 and older in orthopaedic care - what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe what nursing and rehabilitation staff know and do with regard to urinary incontinence and risk of urinary incontinence in patients 65 years or older undergoing hip surgery.

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence is a common but often neglected issue for older people. Despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines on how to assess, manage and prevent urinary incontinence, there are indications that these guidelines are not applied in hospital care.

DESIGN

A qualitative study with descriptive design was conducted in two orthopaedic units.

METHODS

Forty-six interviews and 36 observations of care were conducted from January-October 2014 and analysed with qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Enrolled nurses performed most of the care related to bladder function, with focus on urinary catheterisation and preventing urinary tract infection and urinary retention. Registered nurses' role in urinary matters mainly comprised documentation, while the rehabilitation staff focused on making it possible for the patient to be independent in toileting. The nursing staff considered urinary incontinence a common condition for older people and that it was convenient for the patients to have an indwelling catheter or incontinence pad/pant, although they acknowledged some of the risks associated with these procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary incontinence is not a priority in orthopaedic care, and urinary incontinence guidelines are not applied. Further, attitudes and actions are mainly characterised by a lack of urinary incontinence knowledge and the nursing and rehabilitation staff do not take a team approach to preventing and managing urinary incontinence.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

An increased focus on knowledge on urinary incontinence and evidence-based guidelines is needed. To secure evidence-based practice, the team of nursing and rehabilitation staff and managers must be aligned and work actively together, also including the patient in the team.

Improving continence services for older people from the service-providers' perspective: a qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVE

To examine in depth the views and experiences of continence service leads in England on key service and continence management characteristics in order to identify and to improve our understanding of barriers to a good-quality service and potential facilitators to develop and to improve services for older people with urinary incontinence (UI).

DESIGN

Qualitative semistructured interviews using a purposive sample recruited across 16 continence services.

SETTING

3 acute and 13 primary care National Health Service Trusts in England.

PARTICIPANTS

16 continence service leads in England actively treating and managing older people with UI.

RESULTS

In terms of barriers to a good-quality service, participants highlighted a failure on the part of commissioners, managers and other health professionals in recognising the problem of UI and in acknowledging the importance of continence for older people and prevalent negative attitudes towards continence and older people. Patient assessment and continence promotion regardless of age, rather than pad provision, were identified as important steps for a good-quality service for older people with UI. More rapid and appropriate patient referral pathways, investment in service capacity, for example, more trained staff and strengthened interservice collaborations and a higher profile within medical and nurse training were specified as being important facilitators for delivering an equitable and high-quality continence service. There is a need, however, to consider the accounts given by our participants as perhaps serving the interests of their professional group within the context of interprofessional work.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data point to important barriers and facilitators of a good-quality service for older people with UI, from the perspective of continence service leads. Further research should address the views of other stakeholders, and explore options for the empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of identified service facilitators.