Collective decisions about medical futility

Bioethics mediation: the role and importance of nursing advocacy

Ethics consultations are utilized in health care to identify and manage conflict, difficult decision-making, and ethical issues. In bioethics mediation, a more updated approach using interpersonal, mediative, conflict management, and dispute resolution skills is merged with ethical principles to manage dilemmas arising in healthcare settings. This article argues, based on a professional obligation to advocate for the good of the client, that nurses must assume leadership roles in mediation processes. Nurses can initiate and fully participate in formal bioethics mediation and other mediative interventions. Nurse administrators can work to evolve existing ethics consult models to mediation models. Nonetheless, mediative efforts of individual nurses must be grounded in realization of the multifactorial nature of conflict and dilemma in healthcare settings. Multidisciplinary mediative interventions, framed by sound institutional policies, may best serve the complex needs of ethically vulnerable clients. To best advocate for these at-risk clients, nurses must assume various leadership roles in mediation processes.

Improving the ICU: part 1

ICUs are a vital component of modern health care. Improving ICU performance requires that we shift from a paradigm that concentrates on individual performance to a different paradigm that emphasizes the need to assess and improve ICU systems and processes. This is the first part of a two-part treatise. It discusses existing problems in ICU care, and the methods for defining and measuring ICU performance.

The continuing ethical dilemma of the do-not-resuscitate order

The continued use of the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order remains very confusing to health care workers, especially when surgical intervention is undertaken either by choice or necessity. Although ethics committees can aid in clarification, and the use of advance directives can further define patient wishes, patient and family member education is necessary to ascertain what a surgical patient really desires. As technology advances, perioperative nurses will continue to be bombarded with ethical issues surrounding the DNR order. This article addresses how nurses can be proactive in obtaining answers to these difficult questions and learn how to deal with this dilemma.

High technology near the end of life: setting limits

High technology interventions near the end of life exact a high cost both in human and economic terms. Breathtaking advances in cardiology have helped to prolong life and improve its quality for many. For some, it has transformed the process of dying into a medical nightmare. The "do everything possible" attitude that prevailed during the past few decades is both inhumane and wasteful. In contrast, in the new era of managed care with its focus on profit, a well meaning physician may become suspect whenever he recommends against a medical intervention that he deems to be futile. More than ever before, there is a pressing need to develop rational guidelines for end of life medical interventions to ensure primacy of patients' best interests, protect the integrity of the doctor-patient relationship and affirm the duty of the medical establishment toward society at large. This weighty issue must not be relinquished to medical ethicists, health care alliances or the courts. It is the domain of physicians and the public at large. Medical futility should be defined as a treatment unlikely to affect the course of illness or that which has failed to achieve its desired effects. Rational guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do not resuscitate orders should be formulated for both inhospital and out of hospital victims of cardiac arrest. These guidelines need to be developed through a process similar to those for the treatment of unstable angina, with involvement from all relevant medical specialities. Proposed guidelines must be negotiated, reviewed and ratified by the lay public. Appropriate legislation is necessary to establish the framework and policies to carry out agreed on recommendations. The focus of the "living will" should change so that it covers the last chapter of life rather than its terminal phase. The document should serve to express the person's wishes regarding specific medical interventions when the quality of life is seriously diminished beyond what is uniquely desirable for the particular patient. Living wills must be comprehensive, clear and specific. They must be honored. The Uniform Health Decisions Act, now pending legislation, should enhance the utility of the living will.

Medical futility and nursing

Defining medical futility is central to the efforts of clinicians and ethicists who seek to identify the limits of patient autonomy. This article is a critique of current efforts to define and then use policies of medical futility to justify refusing requests for treatment and care that have no perceived medical benefit. After exploring the current definitions of medical futility in the bioethics and clinical literature, comparisons of the advantages and disadvantages of the following three options are provided: allowing patients to decide all but physiologic futility, allowing clinicians to decide futility, and pursuing negotiated compromise. The third option--negotiated compromise--is recommended. A role is developed for nurses in preventing and resolving conflict about futile treatment.