1
|
Dedivitis RA, de Matos LL, de Castro MAF, Kowalski LP. Association of the Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status with Local Recurrence and Survival in Open Partial Laryngectomy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2491. [PMID: 38731017 PMCID: PMC11084571 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Positive margins are associated with locoregional recurrence in early laryngeal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of specimen-driven (ex vivo) positive margins on patients with early-stage laryngeal cancer whose tumor bed (defect-driven) margins had been negative. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 60 consecutive T1b/T2 glottic cancer patients who underwent open frontolateral laryngectomy. The intraoperative margins were obtained from the tumor bed. Their recurrence and disease-free survival were evaluated. In all cases, negative margins were obtained from the surgical bed. The impact of positive margins from the specimen was evaluated in a paraffin study. Results: Among 10 patients with positive margins in the specimen, six experienced local relapse, and among 50 patients with negative margins in the specimen, three developed recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 37.5% and 93.9%, respectively (p < 0.001; log-rank). Even with negative margins in the surgical bed, patients with positive margins in the specimen at the final histopathological examination had a 3.5-fold higher chance of developing local recurrence than those with negative margins (HR = 13.993; 95% CI: 3.479-56.281; p < 0.001; univariate Cox regression). Conclusions: Specimen-driven positive margins represent a significant risk factor for local recurrence, even under negative margins at the tumor bed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leandro Luongo de Matos
- School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil; (R.A.D.); (L.L.d.M.); (L.P.K.)
| | | | - Luiz Paulo Kowalski
- School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-220, Brazil; (R.A.D.); (L.L.d.M.); (L.P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saraniti C, Speciale R, Gallina S, Salvago P. Prognostic role of resection margin in open oncologic laryngeal surgery: survival analysis of a cohort of 139 patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 85:603-610. [PMID: 30213593 PMCID: PMC9443017 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma needs accurate risk stratification, in order to choose the most suitable therapy. The prognostic significance of resection margin is still highly debated, considering the contradictory results obtained in several studies regarding the survival rate of patients with a positive resection margin. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic role of resection margin in terms of survival and risk of recurrence of primary tumour through survival analysis. METHODS Between 2007 and 2014, 139 patients affected by laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma underwent partial or total laryngectomy and were followed for mean of 59.44±28.65 months. Resection margin status and other variables such as sex, age, tumour grading, pT, pN, surgical technique adopted, and post-operative radio- and/or chemotherapy were investigated as prognostic factors. RESULTS 45.32% of patients underwent total laryngectomy, while the remaining subjects in the cohort underwent partial laryngectomy. Resection margins in 73.39% of samples were free of disease, while in 21 patients (15.1%) anatomo-pathological evaluation found one of the margins to be close; in 16 subjects (11.51%) an involved resection margin was found. Only 6 patients (4.31%) had a recurrence, which occurred in 83.33% of these patients within the first year of follow-up. Disease specific survival was 99.24% after 1 year, 92.4% after 3 years, and 85.91% at 5 years. The multivariate analysis of all covariates showed an increased mortality rate only with regard to pN (HR=5.043; p=0.015) and recurrence (HR=11.586; p=0.012). Resection margin did not result an independent predictor (HR=0.757; p=0.653). CONCLUSIONS Our study did not recognize resection margin as an independent prognostic factor; most previously published papers lack unanimous, methodological choices, and the cohorts of patients analyzed are not easy to compare. To reach a unanimous agreement regarding the prognostic value of resection margins, it would be necessary to carry out meta-analyses on studies sharing definition of resection margin, methodology and post-operative therapeutic choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Saraniti
- Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Sperimentale e Neuroscienze Cliniche (BioNeC), Sezione di Otorinolaringoiatria, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Speciale
- Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Sperimentale e Neuroscienze Cliniche (BioNeC), Sezione di Otorinolaringoiatria, Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gallina
- Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Sperimentale e Neuroscienze Cliniche (BioNeC), Sezione di Otorinolaringoiatria, Palermo, Italy
| | - Pietro Salvago
- Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Sperimentale e Neuroscienze Cliniche (BioNeC), Sezione di Otorinolaringoiatria, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahn SH, Hong HJ, Kwon SY, Kwon KH, Roh JL, Ryu J, Park JH, Baek SK, Lee GH, Lee SY, Lee JC, Chung MK, Joo YH, Ji YB, Hah JH, Kwon M, Park YM, Song CM, Shin SC, Ryu CH, Lee DY, Lee YC, Chang JW, Jeong HM, Cho JK, Cha W, Chun BJ, Choi IJ, Choi HG, Lee KD. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 10:1-43. [PMID: 28043099 PMCID: PMC5327593 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2016.01389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jun Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Soon Young Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Hwan Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Lyel Roh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junsun Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jun Hee Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung-Kuk Baek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Guk Haeng Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sei Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Choon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Man Ki Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Ji
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hun Hah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minsu Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Young Min Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Myeon Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Chan Shin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Doh Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chan Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Won Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ha Min Jeong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jae-Keun Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Wonjae Cha
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Byung Joon Chun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ik Joon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Geun Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Dae Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakayama M, Miyamoto S, Seino Y, Okamoto T, Kano K, Hasebe M, Okamoto M. One hundred supracricoid laryngectomies with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy: do we achieve better local control? Jpn J Clin Oncol 2015; 45:732-7. [PMID: 25981622 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyv072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy has been known to be able to cope with tumor excisions with minimal margins. Extended resection may result in a limited margin and may impair the prognosis. We conducted a clinicopathologic analysis of local recurrence in supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy patients. METHODS Between 1997 and 2013, 100 patients with glottic cancers underwent supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy. The clinicopathologic findings were evaluated. We also analyzed: (i) cancer-specific and overall survival rates, (ii) the correlation between locoregional recurrence and overall survival, (iii) T staging and larynx preservation rates and (iv) previous radiation history and larynx preservation rates. RESULTS Local recurrence was recognized in eight of the 100 patients (8%); all were initially staged as T3 or T4. Recurrence was identified in the submucosal regions of the ipsilateral arytenoid and/or infraglottis. Six patients were salvaged by completion total laryngectomy except two. Cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 93%; overall survival at 5 years was 89%. There was no significant difference between overall survival and locoregional recurrence. There was a significant difference between larynx preservation in T1-2 and T3-4 patients. There was no significant difference between larynx preservation and the previous radiation therapy status. CONCLUSIONS Our experience convinced us of the clinical potential of supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy as one of the effective options for functional larynx preservation. Supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy is the most suitable for unfavorable T2 and T3a cases and is applicable for appropriately selected radiation-failed patients. Thorough pre-operative evaluation, proper surgical techniques and careful follow-up are prerequisites for the success of supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meijin Nakayama
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Miyamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yutomo Seino
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| | - Tabito Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| | - Koichi Kano
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| | - Masayuki Hasebe
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| | - Makito Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Relationship between preepiglottic space invasion and lymphatic metastasis in supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidopexy. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 7:205-9. [PMID: 25177437 PMCID: PMC4135157 DOI: 10.3342/ceo.2014.7.3.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2012] [Revised: 03/09/2013] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the role of preepiglottic space (PES) invasion in lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients undergoing supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) with cricohyoidopexy (CHP). Methods A retrospective review of 42 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx that underwent surgery was performed. The mean age of the subjects was 61.3 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 38:4. Regarding their pathological stages, there were 3, 8, 22, and 9 cases of stage T1 to T4, respectively. Concerning the disease stage of the cervical lymph nodes, there were 30, 5, 6, and 1 cases with N0 to N3, respectively. Results The PES invasion rate was 23.8% (10/42). Significant correlations were found between PES invasion and cervical lymph node metastasis (P=0.002). Seven of the 10 patients (70.0%) with PES invasion had cervical lymph node metastasis, whereas only 5 of the 32 patients (15.6%) without any evidence of PES invasion had lymph node metastasis. There was also a significant correlation of PES invasion with age (P=0.002) and T stage (P=0.030). However, there was no significant relationship between gender, primary tumor site, anterior commissure invasion, subglottic extension, paraglottic space invasion and PES invasion. There was a 5-year disease-specific survival of 70%. PES invasion served as a statistically significant prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (P=0.004). Cervical nodal metastasis (P=0.003) and subglottic extension (P=0.01) were also statistically significant prognostic factors associated with disease-specific survival. Conclusion The PES invasion was significantly related to the cervical lymph node metastasis and prognosis in patients undergoing SCPL with CHP.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pradhan S, Mehta M, Hakeem A, Tubachi J, Kannan R. Transoral resection of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Indian J Surg Oncol 2010; 1:207-11. [PMID: 22930636 PMCID: PMC3421007 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-010-0034-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2010] [Accepted: 04/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of transoral microlaryngoscopic laser surgery is making a significant impact on treatment decisions in the management of early squamous cancers of the larynx and the hypopharynx. It has, to a great extent replaced the conventional open partial laryngectomy procedures. Moreover many cancers of the larynx or the hypopharynx that were earlier being treated with radiation therapy are now resected transorally with the CO(2) laser. This article focuses on the progress of transoral laser microsurgery in the management of early larygopharyngeal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sultan Pradhan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Aga Hall, Mazgaon, Mumbai, 400 010 India
| | - Marzi Mehta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Aga Hall, Mazgaon, Mumbai, 400 010 India
| | - Arsheed Hakeem
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Aga Hall, Mazgaon, Mumbai, 400 010 India
| | - Jagadish Tubachi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Aga Hall, Mazgaon, Mumbai, 400 010 India
| | - R. Kannan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Prince Aly Khan Hospital, Aga Hall, Mazgaon, Mumbai, 400 010 India
| |
Collapse
|