Intraoral excision of the submandibular gland: how we do it

Submandibular Gland Surgery; Transoral Versus Conventional Transcervical Approach

INTRODUCTION

Transcervical approach (TCA) is a widely accepted method of surgery in submandibular gland (SMG) excision. The main purpose of the present study is to compare the surgical and functional outcomes of TCA and transoral approach (TOA) in SMG excision.

METHODS

The participants of this prospective study are 31 consecutive patients in whom SMG excision was performed via TOA (n = 14) and TCA (n = 17). Operative time, complications, hospitalization time, postoperative morbidities, and histopathological results were noted and compared between the groups. The numerical rating scale was used to grade the postoperative morbidities including, pain, eating and swallowing difficulty, and abnormal sense of tongue.

RESULTS

The number of females (n = 10) was higher than males (n = 4) in the TOA group due to aesthetic concerns. The average operative time of TOA group (85.3 ± 17.8 minutes) was significantly longer than the TCA group (40.8 ± 7.3 minutes), whereas the mean hospitalization time in TOA group (28.5 ± 4.6 hours) was remarkably shorter than TCA group (49.4 ± 6.9 hours). The mean pain scores were significantly less in the TOA group than the TCA group during the first 3 days postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean numerical rating scale scores of eating and swallowing difficulty and abnormal sense of tongue were significantly higher in the TOA group compared to the TCA group postoperatively. There was no postoperative marginal mandibular nerve (MMN) dysfunction seen in the TAO group, whereas temporary dysfunction of MMN was observed in 3 (17.6%) patients in the TCA group.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, transoral SMG excision is an indisputable superior method in terms of MMN inadvertent injury risk, cosmetic results and postoperative pain compared to the conventional method of TCA in selected cases. Especially in young female patients with serious aesthetic concerns, excision of SMG via a TOA without any visible incision provides cosmetically excellent satisfactory results.

Transoral Submandibular Ganglion Neurectomy

Background:

The management of sialorrhea can be difficult for both the patient and the clinician. Current management includes behavioral modification, anticholinergics, botulinum injections, and a variety of surgical options, which all have demonstrated some efficacy. As minimally invasive procedures flourish, we explore the feasibility of highly selective transoral submandibular neurectomy (TOSN) for the management of sialorrhea.

Methods:

Ten human cadaver dissections of the floor of mouth were performed bilaterally, for a total of 20 separate cases. An intraoral technique for highly selective, submandibular ganglion neurectomy is demonstrated.

Results:

A transoral submandibular ganglion neurectomy was performed in 10 cadavers (20 neurectomies) easily and reliably, without injury to the submandibular duct or the main trunk of the lingual nerve.

Conclusion:

Transoral submandibular neurectomy is an attractive addition to the armamentarium of surgical options for the treatment of medically intractable sialorrhea. Further study in selected patients would need to be performed to demonstrate clinical feasibility.

Comparison of the intraoral and transcervical approach in submandibular gland excision

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefits of the intraoral approach for removal of the submandibular gland (SMG) by comparing it with the usual method of the transcervical approach. Sixteen patients who required SMG resection for benign disorders were divided into two surgical groups who underwent surgery via the intraoral (n = 8) or transcervical (n = 8) approach. The intraoral approach (IOA) consisted of an incision on the floor of mouth from the caruncle of Wharton's duct to the retromolar trigone while the transcervical approach (TCA) consisted of an incision along the natural skin crease overlying the gland. The operation time, hospital stay, complications, and cosmetic appearance were compared between groups. The mean operation time of the IOA group was significantly longer than that of the TCA group, but decreased gradually with surgical experience. The mean hospital stay of the IOA group was significantly shorter than that of the TCA group. Most patients (88 %) of the IOA group experienced sensory defects of the lingual nerve, but these symptoms were temporary. No lasting complications were noted in the IOA group; however, one patient of the TCA group had permanent paralysis of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. The incision scars were invisible owing to the location on the mouth floor in the IOA group, whereas they were apparent even on the natural skin crease of the neck in the TCA group. In conclusion, the SMG can be removed safely and effectively by IOA with the avoidance of an external scar and of injury to the marginal mandibular nerve. We suggest that the IOA be substituted for the TCA as the primary procedure for removal of the SMG in suitably selected patients.