Mutagenicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Amines: A Conformational Hypothesis

Shock Tube/Laser Absorption Measurements of Cyclopentadiene Pyrolysis

High-temperature cyclopentadiene pyrolysis was examined behind reflected shock waves in a heated shock tube using several laser absorption diagnostic schemes. A two-color, online-offline sensor near 3335 cm-1 was used to measure time histories of acetylene, while a three-color scheme of diagnostics at 10.532, 10.675, and 11.345 μm yielded measurements of cyclopentadiene and ethylene. Species time histories of cyclopentadiene decomposition and acetylene formation as well as ethylene yields are reported from 1319 to 1678 K at 1.2-1.5 atm. In addition, the overall decomposition rate of cyclopentadiene is reported, and comparisons are made to a number of kinetic models.

Toward an understanding of the role of DNA adduct conformation in defining mutagenic mechanism based on studies of the major adduct (formed at N(2)-dG) of the potent environmental carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene

The process of carcinogenesis is initiated by mutagenesis, which often involves replication past damaged DNA. One question - what exactly is a DNA polymerase seeing when it incorrectly copies a damaged DNA base (e.g., inserting dATP opposite a dG adduct)? - has not been answered in any case. Herein, we reflect on this question, principally by considering the mutagenicity of one activated form of benzo[a]pyrene, (+)-anti-B[a]PDE, and its major adduct [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG. In previous work, [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG was shown to be capable of inducing>95% G-->T mutations in one sequence context (5'-TGC), and approximately 95% G-->A mutations in another (5'-AGA). This raises the question - how can a single chemical entity induce different mutations depending upon DNA sequence context? Our current working hypothesis is that adduct conformational complexity causes adduct mutational complexity, where DNA sequence context can affect the former, thereby influencing the latter. Evidence supporting this hypothesis was discussed recently (Seo et al., Mutation Res. [in press]). Assuming this hypothesis is correct (at least in some cases), one goal is to consider what these mutagenic conformations might be. Based on molecular modeling studies, 16 possible conformations for [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG are proposed. A correlation between molecular modeling and mutagenesis work suggests a hypothesis (Hypothesis 3): a base displaced conformation with the dG moiety of the adduct in the major vs. minor groove gives G-->T vs. G-->A mutations, respectively. (Hypothesis 4, which is a generalized version of Hypothesis 3, is also proposed, and can potentially rationalize aspects of both [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG and AP-site mutagenesis, as well as the so-called "A-rule".) Finally, there is a discussion of how conformational complexity might explain some unusual mutagenesis results that suggest [+ta]-B[a]P-N(2)-dG can become trapped in different conformations, and why we think it makes sense to interpret adduct mutagenesis results by modeling ds-DNA (at least in some cases), even though the mutagenic event must occur at a ss/ds-DNA junction in the presence of a DNA polymerase.

A hypothesis for what conformation of the major adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE (N2-dG) causes G-->T versus G-->A mutations based upon a correlation between mutagenesis and molecular modeling results

Molecular modeling (simulated annealing) was used to study the conformations in dsDNA of [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG (R.E. Kozack and E.L.Loechler, accompanying paper), which is the major benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) adduct. Sixteen classes of conformations were identified, and are analyzed herein vis-a-vis the two most prominent B[a]P mutations, G-->T and G-->A base substitutions. Eight conformations seem more relevant to frameshift mutagenesis, so they are excluded, leaving eight conformations as follows. Two conformations (BPmi5 and BPmi3) retain Watson-Crick G:C base pairing having the B[a]P moiety of the adduct in the minor groove. Two conformations (BPma5 and BPma3) have the Hoogsteen orientation with B[a]P in the major groove. Four conformations are base displaced and have B[a]P stacked in the helix with the dG moiety of the adduct displaced into either the major groove (Gma5 and Gma3) or the minor groove (Gmi5 and Gmi3). Three of these eight conformations (BPma5, BPma3 and Gma3) are universally high in energy. The two conformations that retain G:C base pairing potential (BPmi5 and BPmi3) are likely to be non-mutagenic. Of the three remaining conformations, Gmi5 can be relatively low in energy, but is distorted. A correlation exists between the calculated energies for the remaining two base displaced conformations and mutagenesis for [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG, leading to the hypothesis that Gma5 is responsible for G-->T mutations and Gmi3 is responsible for G-->A mutations. Gma5 and Gmi3 resemble each other, except that dG is in the major and minor grooves, respectively. An incipient rationale for this hypothesis is discussed: DNA polymerase might be triggered to follow a different mutagenic pathway depending upon whether a non-informational lesion has bulk protruding into the major or minor groove. A pathway for interconversion between these eight conformations is also proposed and its implications are discussed; e.g. four steps are required to interconvert between Gma5 and Gmi3.