Down-regulation of cytotoxic T lymphocyte generation by two distinct suppressor-cell systems

Tolerant T cells display impaired trafficking ability

Based on our previous observation that anergic T lymphocytes lose their migratory ability in vitro, we have proposed that anergic T cells are retained in the site where they have been generated to exert their regulatory function. In this study we have analyzed T lymphocyte trafficking and motility following the induction of tolerance in vivo. In a model of non-deletional negative vaccination to xenoantigens in which dendritic cells (DC) localize to specific lymphoid sites depending on the route of administration, tolerant T cells remained localized in the lymph nodes colonized by tolerogenic DC, while primed T cells could traffic efficiently. Using an oral tolerance model that enables the 'tracking' of ovalbumin-specific TCR-transgenic T cells, we confirmed that T cells lose the ability to migrate through syngeneic endothelial cell monolayers following tolerance induction in vivo. Finally, we show that tolerant T cells (both in vitro and ex vivo) can inhibit migration of responsive T cells in an antigen-independent manner. Thus, hyporesponsive T cells localize at the site of tolerance induction in vivo, where they exert their anti-inflammatory properties. In physiological terms, this effect is likely to render immunoregulation a more efficient and controllable event.

Anergic T cells exert antigen-independent inhibition of cell-cell interactions via chemokine metabolism

Due to their ability to inhibit antigen-induced T-cell activation in vitro and in vivo, anergic T cells can be considered part of the spectrum of immunoregulatory T lymphocytes. Here we report that both murine and human anergic T cells can impair the ability of parenchymal cells (including endothelial and epithelial cells) to establish cell-cell interactions necessary to sustain leukocyte migration in vitro and tissue infiltration in vivo. The inhibition is reversible and cell-contact dependent but does not require cognate recognition of the parenchymal cells to occur. Instrumental to this effect is the increased cell surface expression and enzymatic activity of molecules such as CD26 (dipeptidyl-peptidase IV), which may act by metabolizing chemoattractants bound to the endothelial/epithelial cell surface. These results describe a previously unknown antigen-independent anti-inflammatory activity by locally generated anergic T cells and define a novel mechanism for the long-known immunoregulatory properties of these cells.

Cytokine production by rabbit alveolar macrophages: differences between activated and suppressor cell phenotypes

The differences between cytokine-producing profiles of activated macrophages (A-M phi) and suppressor macrophages (S-M phi) were examined. A-M phi, which exhibited cytotoxicity against RK-13 cells, were generated from resident rabbit alveolar M phi by treatment with lymphokine solution (culture fluids of rabbit spleen cells stimulated with concanavalin A [Con A]). S-M phi, which were able to inhibit cellular proliferations of rabbit spleen cells stimulated with Con A, were generated from resident alveolar M phi by treatment with 1-methyladenosine (an immunosuppressive molecule in tumourous ascites fluids). When A-M phi were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vitro, the cells produced significantly more interleukin (IL)-1 (approximately 1.4 times), IL-6 (approximately 2.1 times), IL-12 (approximately 60 times), and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) (approximately 37 times) than did resting macrophages (R-M phi) stimulated with LPS as control cells. After the stimulation with LPS, both A-M phi and R-M phi did not produce transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). In contrast, when S-M phi were stimulated with LPS in vitro, the cells produced significantly more TGF-beta (approximately 1.6 times) and significantly less IL-6 (approximately 1.8 times) than did control cells. Also, S-M phi did not produce IL-1, IL-12, and TNF-alpha into their culture fluids after the stimulation with LPS. These results show the differences between cytokine-producing profiles of A-M phi and S-M phi, and characteristics of their cytokine-producing profiles are analogous to T cell subsets. Differences displayed in the cytokine profiles may contribute to the effector (A-M phi) or the suppressor (S-M phi) functions of alveolar M phi.

Induced suppression of the efferent phase of contact sensitivity in rats

A study of the immunosuppressive systems of rats has been conducted with special attention to whether suppressor cells can be induced to down-regulate the efferent limb of contact sensitivity. Contact sensitivity (CS)1 was induced in DA rats 5 days after immunization with trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB). Intravenous pretreatment of naive rats with TNP-coupled syngeneic spleen cells 7 days before sensitization suppressed the induction of CS by 60%. Suppression of the inductive phase of CS could be transferred adoptively into syngeneic rats with spleen cells of such tolerized animals. Cell fractionation studies showed the OX8+ (CD8) T cell population (cytotoxic/suppressor) was responsible for the suppression in the afferent phase of CS. Such cells were incapable of suppressing preexisting CS. To investigate whether suppression could be induced for the efferent phase, spleen and peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) from rats tolerized by administering TNP-spleen cells iv plus epidermal paintings with TNCB were adoptively transferred into recipients sensitized 4 days earlier. Both spleen cells and PEC suppressed the efferent phase of CS but PEC did so more efficiently. Separation of splenic cells revealed the suppressors to be CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, separation of PEC into plastic adherent and nonadherent cells showed the nonadherent (T cell enriched) cells to be noneffective alone. The adherent subpopulation conveyed suppression but did so more effectively upon addition of the T cells. Thus, T cells and macrophages may operate in concert to achieve suppression of the efferent limb of CS. PEC from tolerized rats suppressed performed CS of any specificity but only after the suppressor cells were triggered with the same antigen that induced them. Since both the afferent and efferent phases of CS have now been shown to be suppressable, two separate suppressor mechanisms may be operable in rats.