The reflex effects of tachycardias on autonomic tone

Syncope associated with supraventricular tachycardia: Diagnostic role of implantable loop recorders

Syncope represents a relatively uncommon symptom of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). It is likely that an impaired autonomic vasomotor response to the hemodynamic stress of tachycardia is the determinant of hemodynamic changes leading to cerebral hypoperfusion and syncope. In this regard, tilt‐table test may detect abnormalities in the autonomic nervous function and predict the occurrence of syncope during SVT. Electrophysiology studies may reproduce the SVT, distinguish it from other life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and exclude other causes of syncope. Not infrequently mixed syncope mechanisms are revealed during the above diagnostic workup raising doubts about the operating mechanism in the clinical setting. In such cases of uncertainty, an implantable loop recorder, providing long‐term cardiac monitoring, may play a pivotal role in the establishment of the diagnosis, confirming the association of an arrhythmic event with the symptom. Herein, we present four such cases with recurrent unexplained syncope finally attributed to paroxysmal SVT guiding them to a potentially radical treatment through radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Evaluation of the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on autonomic function in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by head-up tilt table test

Background:

One of the recommended treatments for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), is radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). However, RFCA may affect the autonomic system. This study aims to evaluate the effect of RFCA on autonomic system in patients with PSVT by head-up tilt table (HUTT) test.

Materials and Methods:

In a before–after study, 22 patients with PSVT were enrolled. Data were collected with a data collection form that included two parts. Electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram, 24-h Holter monitoring, HUTT test, heart rate variability (HRV) indexes, and symptoms of all patients were recorded 24 h before and 1 month after the ablation. Wilcoxon, McNemar, Mann–Whitney U, and Chi-square tests were used to analyze the data.

Results:

Of the total 22 patients, 31.8% were male and 68.2% were female. There were significant differences in heart palpitation (P < 0.0001) and non-specific symptoms (P = 0.031) and no significant difference in head-up tilt test results and HRV indices before and after RFCA. The results showed that there were no significant differences in specific and non-specific symptoms in patients with AVNRT with positive and negative HUTT before and after RFCA.

Conclusions:

The observed difference in heart palpitation and non-specific symptoms emphasized the role of AVNRT in causing these symptoms. Autonomic dysfunction is more probably an accompanying condition of AVNRT than causing symptoms. We could not find any significance in the results of HUTT after RFCA. HUTT cannot determine or predict the symptoms after RFCA.

Effect of blood pressure on vascular hemodynamics in acute tachycardia

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia is accompanied by hypotension, which can affect vascular hemodynamics. Here, we hypothesized that a fall in blood flow as a result of hypotension has a larger effect on hemodynamics in medium-sized peripheral arteries compared with increased pulsatility in rapid pacing. To test this hypothesis, we experimentally and theoretically investigated hemodynamic changes in femoral, carotid, and subclavian arteries at heart rates of 95-170 beats/min after acute pacing. The arterial pressure, blood flow, and other hemodynamic parameters remained statistically unchanged for heart rates ≤ 135 beats/min. Systemic pressure and flow velocities, however, showed an abrupt decrease, resulting in larger alteration of hemodynamic parameters for heart rates ≥ 155 beats/min after pacing (initial period) and then recovered close to baseline after several minutes of pacing (recovery period). During the initial period, the pressure dropped from 88 mmHg (baseline) to 44 mmHg, and the flow velocity decreased to about one-third of baseline at heart rate of 170 beats/min. A hemodynamic analysis showed a velocity profile with a near-wall retrograde flow or a fully reversed flow during the initial period, which vanished at the recovery period. It was concluded that the initial fall of blood flow due to pressure drop led to transient flow reversal and negative wall shear stress because this phenomena was not observed at the recovery period. This study underscores the significant effects of hypotension on vascular hemodynamics, which may have relevance to physiology and chronic pathophysiology in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.

Cardiac arrhythmias and the autonomic nervous system

The multiple facets of cardiac arrhythmias and their relationship with the autonomic nervous system can be investigated by studying the spontaneous heart rate behavior through ambulatory ECG recordings, an approach that complements the limitations of invasive electrophysiologic investigations. Information obtained from heart rate behavior is more reliable in the absence of structural heart disease and ventricular hypertrophy/failure, during which compensatory mechanisms involving the autonomic nervous system tend to limit reflex changes in heart rate. Thus, in such situations, less marked sinus rhythm variations preceding the arrhythmia onset do not imply a more limited influence of the autonomic nervous system, and the sensitivity of the electrophysiologic substrate may otherwise vary. These two factors may combine to form the basis of the "adrenergic paradox" that implies that the more marked the autonomic nervous system dependence of tachyarrhythmias, the less obvious its evidence. Assessment of the QT interval dynamicity may also allow one to evaluate the modulation of autonomic neural effects on the ventricular tissues. Finally, it may be difficult to distinguish clearly autonomic nervous system dependence from rate dependence: the latter frequently conditions the behavior of the trigger whereas the former mainly concerns the electrophysiologic substrate. There are many examples of the importance of the autonomic nervous system as a determinant of cardiac arrhythmias. In the atrium, either limb of the autonomic nervous system, particularly the parasympathetic limb, can generate atrial fibrillation. The absence of structural heart disease defines pure electrophysiologic substrates responsible for benign forms of ventricular tachycardia as well as potentially lethal tachyarrhythmias of the long QT syndrome and its variants. In both, the role of the autonomic nervous system is essential, although the therapeutic consequences are crucial only in the latter. In the presence of heart disease and, in particular, heart failure, the autonomic nervous system behavior is more difficult to assess than in the absence of structural heart disease. This does not mean that its role is less crucial. In this situation the beneficial effects of beta blockers may be as important as in normal hearts although physicians should be more cautious when heart failure is present.

Syncope associated with supraventricular tachycardia. An expression of tachycardia rate or vasomotor response?

BACKGROUND

Syncope in patients with supraventricular tachycardia has been suggested to be an ominous finding, predictive of rapid rates during tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To explore the mechanism of syncope during supraventricular tachycardia, tachycardia was induced in the supine position and after passive head-up tilting to 60 degrees in 13 patients with atrioventricular (AV) node reentry, eight patients with AV reentry, and one patient with atrial tachycardia. Tilt testing was also performed in sinus rhythm for 30 minutes (the last 15 minutes with isoproterenol infusion). Mean +/- SEM age was 38 +/- 3 years, and 11 patients had a history of syncope (median number of syncopal episodes, three; range, one to 30). The cycle length of tachycardia when upright was shorter than when supine (297 +/- 9 compared with 357 +/- 10 msec, p less than 0.001), and mean blood pressure fell to a greater extent after the onset of tachycardia (fall in mean blood pressure, 53 +/- 6 compared with 24 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.001). Mean blood pressure correlated significantly with tachycardia cycle length when supine (r = 0.58, p = 0.005) but not when tilted upright (r = 0.18, p = 0.45). Syncope occurred in seven patients during upright tachycardia. These seven patients had a greater fall in mean blood pressure with upright tachycardia than the 15 patients without syncope (fall in mean blood pressure, 70 +/- 4 compared with 45 +/- 5 mm Hg, p = 0.01), but there was no difference in the tachycardia cycle length (311 +/- 10 compared with 290 +/- 11 msec, p = 0.29). Six of the seven patients with tachycardia-induced syncope also had syncope with tilt testing in sinus rhythm compared with four of the 15 patients without tachycardia-induced syncope (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the view that syncope during supraventricular tachycardia is related to vasomotor factors and does not predict a more rapid tachycardia rate.