Doing good before there's harm

20 Years of Public Health Economics and Decision Sciences at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: The CDC Steven M. Teutsch Prevention Effectiveness Fellowship, 1995-2015

The CDC Steven M. Teutsch Prevention Effectiveness Fellowship was started in 1995 to provide postdoctoral training in public health economics. This article describes the origins and state of the fellowship and the practice of prevention effectiveness research at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The fellowship can be seen as one successful example of a demand-driven public health innovation to develop crucial capacity for the contemporary health system. Nearly 150 individuals have been trained through the program since its inception.

Simplified meta-analysis of clinical trials in resuscitation

OBJECTIVE

To present and demonstrate a new simplified method for synthesizing results of multiple clinical trials in resuscitation research.

METHODS

The mean difference across studies in the proportion of favorable outcomes between experimental and control groups is calculated. This difference is shown to have a t-distribution. Its significance can be ascertained with a simple t-test. The analysis can be implemented in a one-page computer spreadsheet.

RESULTS

Simplified meta-analysis provides high sensitivity and can be extended to include weighting of studies according to size or quality, comparison of subgroups of studies, tests for outliers, and calculation of the power of the meta-analysis. Sample analyses are presented for two experimental forms of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): interposed abdominal compression (IAC) CPR and active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional narrative reviews, taking note of the proportion of individual studies with statistically significant results, can lead to erroneous conclusions and unnecessary delays in the clinical use of research findings. Simplified meta-analysis can provide rapid, quantitative, and accurate estimates of the amount of benefit or harm from an experimental intervention and can further empower physicians to practice evidence-based medicine.

Best practice in psychogeriatric care

This paper presents a best practice model for psychogeriatric care. Best practice is becoming one of the most common expressions used in the area of health care, and is often referred to in government reports and documents. The definition of 'best practice', however, is still evolving. What then, is best practice? And how can the principles of best practice be applied and integrated into the clinical speciality of psychogeriatrics? The article emphasizes the importance of evidence-based interventions and the need to focus on the pragmatic aspects of providing best practice in the clinical area of psychogeriatrics; that is, what works best in practice? The position taken by the authors of this paper is that the conceptualization of a best practice model in psychogeriatrics is necessary in order to describe and explain the different components involved in the service provided. This conceptualization also communicates and articulates the role of the major stakeholders, and the key players in the achievement of best practice. A psychogeriatric service may become more coherent, more goal-orientated and more efficient if a model is utilized. This paper outlines a proposed model of best practice in psychogeriatrics, and discusses the potential implications for achieving desirable clinical outcomes.