A critical view of the methods for characterization of the VIP/PACAP receptor subclasses

VPAC receptors: structure, molecular pharmacology and interaction with accessory proteins

The vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a neuropeptide with wide distribution in both central and peripheral nervous systems, where it plays important regulatory role in many physiological processes. VIP displays a large biological functions including regulation of exocrine secretions, hormone release, fetal development, immune responses, etc. VIP appears to exert beneficial effect in neuro-degenerative and inflammatory diseases. The mechanism of action of VIP implicates two subtypes of receptors (VPAC1 and VPAC2), which are members of class B receptors belonging to the super-family of GPCR. This article reviews the current knowledge regarding the structure and molecular pharmacology of VPAC receptors. The structure-function relationship of VPAC1 receptor has been extensively studied, allowing to understand the molecular basis for receptor affinity, specificity, desensitization and coupling to adenylyl cyclase. Those studies have clearly demonstrated the crucial role of the N-terminal ectodomain (N-ted) of VPAC1 receptor in VIP recognition. By using different approaches including directed mutagenesis, photoaffinity labelling, NMR, molecular modelling and molecular dynamic simulation, it has been shown that the VIP molecule interacts with the N-ted of VPAC1 receptor, which is itself structured as a 'Sushi' domain. VPAC1 receptor also interacts with a few accessory proteins that play a role in cell signalling of receptors. Recent advances in the structural characterization of VPAC receptor and more generally of class B GPCRs will lead to the design of new molecules, which could have considerable interest for the treatment of inflammatory and neuro-degenerative diseases.

Class II G protein-coupled receptors for VIP and PACAP: structure, models of activation and pharmacology

VIP and PACAP impact strongly on human pathophysiology. Their receptors are very promising targets for developing new drugs in the treatment of inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. This article reviews the present knowledge regarding VIP and PACAP receptors, i.e. VPAC1, VPAC2 and PAC1. This includes: (I) a critical review of instrumental peptide agonists and antagonists; (II) a survey of recent data regarding the structure of VPAC1 receptor and the docking of VIP in the receptor binding domain. Structural models for the VPAC2 and PAC1 receptor N-terminal ectodomains are also described; (III) A critical description of the two models of VPAC1 receptor activation in the general context of class II/family B G protein-coupled receptors.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in the reproductive system

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) are both members of the glucagon superfamily that, with gonadotropins, act at central and peripheral levels as paracrine and autocrine coregulators of reproductive function. GHRH and PACAP are ancient peptides. Their original forms (both 27 amino acids long) were encoded by a single ancestral gene, several duplications of which led to the genes that encode the neuropeptides of the glucagon superfamily. In the male and female reproductive tracts, GHRH and PACAP interact with a subset of G protein-coupled receptors that are structurally similar to the PACAP receptor and variants of the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor, and share several biological actions. These are related mainly to the modulation of cAMP-dependent and other signal transduction pathways in several cells of the pituitary-gonadal axis. The recent discovery that antagonists of GHRH and PACAP suppress the growth of human cancer cell lines that are derived from reproductive tissues indicates the potential importance of these peptides as local regulators of cell division, cell cycle arrest, differentiation and cell death.

Nitric oxide synthase I and VIP-activated signaling are affected in salivary glands of NOD mice

The autoimmune sialadenitis developed by non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice is considered a suitable model to study the ethiopathogenic mechanisms leading to sicca symptoms in Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Evidence supporting a neural rather than immune origin of the secretory dysfunction has been provided. As both nitric oxide and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are common messengers to nervous and immune systems mediating secretory and inflammatory responses, we examined nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity with special focus on VIP-mediated effects in salivary glands of NOD mice. We found a decreased NOS activity and expression in major salivary glands of NOD mice with respect to control mice. In addition, there was a deficient VIP-activated signaling associated with a reduced saliva and amylase secretion in response to VIP. Our results support the hypothesis of an impaired balance of neuroimmune interactions in salivary glands as early events to take place in the progressive loss of secretory function of NOD mice.

Characterization of functional VIP/PACAP receptors in the human erythroleukemic HEL cell line

The presence of VIP/PACAP receptors was investigated on the human erythroleukemic cell line HEL. Specific binding of [125I]-PACAP or [125I]-VIP on HEL cells or membranes was very low and did not allow to perform competition curves. At 37 degrees C PACAP transiently increased cAMP levels in the presence of the non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX, suggesting rapid desensitization. Kinetic studies revealed that optimal conditions to measure the EC(50) of PACAP(1-27) were 10 min at 20 degrees C. Under those conditions, PACAP-related peptides increased cAMP levels with EC(50) in agreement with the pharmacological profile of the VPAC(1) receptor subtype: PACAP = VIP > [K(15), R(16,) L(27)]VIP(1-7)/GRF(8-27) = [R(16)]ChSn (two VPAC(1) agonists) >> helodermin = secretin. RO 25-1553, a selective activator of VPAC(2) receptor was inactive at 1 microM. Dose-response curves of VPAC(1) agonist molecules (PACAP, VIP, [K(15), R(16), L(27)]VIP(1-7)/GRF(8-27), [R(16)]ChSn) were shifted to the right by the VPAC(1) receptor antagonist [AcHis(1), D-Phe(2), Lys(15), Leu(17)]VIP(3-7)/GRF(8-27), with a K(i) of 3 +/- 1 nM (n = 3). The presence of VPAC(1) receptor mRNA was confirmed by RT-PCR. Preincubation with PACAP or PMA showed that VPAC(1) receptors underwent homologous and heterologous desensitization. This study provides the first evidence for the expression of functional VPAC(1) receptors undergoing rapid desensitization in HEL cells.

In vitro evaluation of VIP/PACAP receptors in healthy and diseased human tissues. Clinical implications

The evaluation of peptide receptors in man is relevant to identifying the physiological target tissues of a given peptide and to selecting diseases with a sufficient receptor overexpression for diagnostic or therapeutic intervention. VIP/PACAP receptors have been evaluated in normal and diseased human non-neuronal tissues by using in vitro receptor autoradiography with 125I-VIP or 125I-PACAP in tissue sections. As assessed by subtype-selective VIP analogs, VIP receptors of the VPAC1 subtype are found in a wide variety of tissues including liver, breast, kidney, prostate, ureter, bladder, pancreatic ducts, gastrointestinal mucosa, lung, thyroid, adipose, and lymphoid tissues. VPAC2 receptors are predominantly found in vessels and smooth muscles, whereas PAC1 receptors are present in the adrenal medulla. VIP/PACAP receptors are expressed in the majority of the most frequently occurring human tumors, including breast, prostate, pancreas, lung, colon, stomach, liver, and bladder carcinomas, as well as lymphomas and meningiomas, predominantly as VPAC1 receptors, as do their tissues of origin. Although leiomyomas predominantly express VPAC2 receptors, glial tumors, pituitary adenomas, neuroblastomas, paragangliomas, pheochromocytomas, and endometrial carcinomas preferentially express PAC1 receptors. The very wide distribution of VIP/PACAP receptors in the normal human body is indicative of the key role of these peptides in human physiology and pathophysiology. Moreover, the receptor expression in tumors is the molecular basis for clinical applications of VIP/PACAP such as in vivo scintigraphy and radiotherapy of tumors as well as VIP/PACAP analog treatment for tumor growth inhibition.

Role of charged amino acids conserved in the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/secretin family of receptors on the secretin receptor functionality

The secretin receptor is a member of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors that recognize polypeptide hormone and/or neuropeptides. Charged, conserved residues might play a key role in their function, either by interacting with the ligand or by stabilizing the receptor structure. Of the four charged amino acids that are conserved in the whole secretin receptor family, D49 and R83 (in the N-terminal domain) were probably important for the secretin receptor structure: replacement of D49 by H or R and of R83 by D severely reduced both the maximal response to secretin and its potency. No functional secretin receptor could be detected after replacement of R83 by L. Mutation of D49 to E, A, or N had no effect or reduced 5-fold the potency of secretin. The highly conserved positive charges found at the extracellular ends of TM III (K194) and IV (R255) were important for the secretin receptor function, as K194 mutation to A or Q and R255 mutation to Q or D decreased the secretin's affinity 15- to 1000-fold, respectively. Six extracellular charged residues are conserved in closely related receptors but not in the whole family. K121 (TM I) and R277 (TM V) were not important for functional secretin receptor expression. D174 (TM II) was necessary to stabilize the active receptor structure: the D174N mutant receptors were unable to stimulate normally the adenylate cyclase in response to secretin, and functional D174A receptors could not be found. Mutation of R255, E259 (second extracellular loop), and E351 (third extracellular loop) to uncharged residues reduced only 10- to 100-fold the secretin potency without changing its efficacy: these residues either stabilized the active receptor conformation or formed hydrogen rather than ionic bonds with secretin. Mutation of K121 (TM I) to Q or L and of R277 (TM V) to E or Q did not affect the receptor functional properties.