1
|
Smith K, Whittington RJ, Green AC, Dhand NK, Moses A, Grove A, Thane T, Dhungyel OP. A survey to understand farmers' perceptions and risk factors for hoof diseases including footrot in sheep in New South Wales, Australia. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9:1000295. [PMCID: PMC9634747 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1000295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of this study were to develop an understanding of farmers' perceptions and risk factors for footrot, including its less severe forms, and other hoof diseases in sheep in New South Wales (NSW). A questionnaire was developed and administered to sheep farmers in Local Land Services (LLS) regions across NSW. LLS staff selected sheep farmers who met the inclusion criteria which included farmers with a minimum of 100 sheep, a history of having had foot problems in their flock or having expressed an interest in improving sheep health and production. Farmers completed the questionnaire either by telephone or via the REDCap online survey platform. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were created. The survey was completed by 43 sheep farmers with a median farm size of 1,500 Ha and flock size of 2,300; footrot was present on 39% of farms while 75.6% had other hoof diseases. A flock of >3,000 sheep were more likely to have footrot than a smaller flock (OR = 11.99, 90% CI = 3.02–63.92, P-value = 0.005) and footrot was less likely to be present on farms when an Animal Health Statement was requested while purchasing sheep (OR = 0.10, 90% CI = 0.01–0.56, P-value = 0.04). Hoof conditions other than footrot were likely to be present in flocks when foot inspections were conducted at a time other than weekly inspections (OR = 0.13, 90% CI = 0.01–0.68, P-value = 0.04) and flocks kept on undulating ground were more likely to have diseases other than footrot compared to those kept on flat ground (OR = 3.72, 90% CI = 1.02–15.80, P-value = 0.09). Most farmers agreed that footrot including its less severe forms can cause production losses and negatively affect animal health and welfare. Limitations of the study were the sample size and dry environmental conditions prior to and during study period in many regions of NSW which limited the expression of footrot.
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith KJ, Whittington RJ, Corrigan MA, Edmonstone BI, Cronin NA, Dhand NK, Dhungyel OP. Efficacy of bivalent fimbrial vaccines to control and eliminate intermediate forms of footrot in sheep. Aust Vet J 2021; 100:121-129. [PMID: 34897647 DOI: 10.1111/avj.13138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of serogroup-specific bivalent fimbrial vaccines in the control and elimination of relatively mild (intermediate) forms of footrot in sheep flocks in NSW, there being some evidence that such forms are difficult to control. METHODS Four flocks of sheep with history of footrot of intermediate virulence were selected based on clinical and bacteriological diagnoses. Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups included in bivalent vaccines at each farm were based on on-farm serogroup-prevalence data. Two doses of bivalent vaccine were administered with a 4-week interval between doses. Repeated post-vaccination inspections of all feet of between 100 and 119 animals per mob were conducted and foot swabs were collected for bacteriological testing. Blood samples were collected from 10 to 24 individually identified animals per flock at each inspection to check for agglutinating antibody responses. RESULTS In the majority of animals, antibody levels for serogroups included in each vaccine were above the level believed to be required for protective immunity. Footrot disappeared on farm 1 prior to vaccination, but did not reappear postvaccination. Footrot was controlled but not eliminated on farms 2, 3, and 4, where the prevalence and severity of the disease and number of serogroups present were reduced. CONCLUSION Serogroup-specific bivalent vaccines can be effective at controlling footrot caused by intermediate strains of D. nodosus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Smith
- Farm Animal Health, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, 2570, Australia
| | - R J Whittington
- Farm Animal Health, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, 2570, Australia
| | - M A Corrigan
- Murray LLS, Albury, New South Wales, 2640, Australia
| | - B I Edmonstone
- Central West LLS, Forbes, New South Wales, 2871, Australia
| | - N A Cronin
- Central West LLS, Forbes, New South Wales, 2871, Australia
| | - N K Dhand
- Farm Animal Health, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, 2570, Australia
| | - O P Dhungyel
- Farm Animal Health, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales, 2570, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ardüser F, Moore-Jones G, Gobeli Brawand S, Dürr S, Steiner A, Ryser-Degiorgis MP, Zanolari P. Dichelobacter nodosus in sheep, cattle, goats and South American camelids in Switzerland-Assessing prevalence in potential hosts in order to design targeted disease control measures. Prev Vet Med 2019; 178:104688. [PMID: 31109750 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Footrot is a contagious foot disease caused by the bacterium Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus) that affects sheep worldwide. Due to substantial economic and welfare impact, various countries have developed control programs against footrot. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the national prevalence of virulent and benign D. nodosus in Switzerland in the four domestic ruminant species sheep, cattle, goats and South American camelids (SAC) to detect potential host populations and to propose targeted disease control measures. Risk factors for infection with the virulent strain of D. nodosus, based on a survey carried out among farmers, were investigated on animal and herd level. Overall, 613 farms and 2920 animals were investigated during 2017-18 applying a two-stage cluster sampling strategy. A Real-Time PCR method for simultaneous detection of virulent and benign strains of D. nodosus was used for the first time in such a large study. On animal level, the true prevalence (TP) of virulent D. nodosus in sheep was estimated at 16.9% (95% confidence interval (CI95%): 9.5-24.3%). In cattle and goats no virulent D. nodosus was detected and in SAC an apparent prevalence (AP) of 0.2% (CI95%: 0.0-0.4%) was observed. On farm level, a TP of virulent D. nodosus of 16.2% (CI95%: 8.4-25.2%) for sheep and an AP of 1.5% (CI95%: 0.3-5.2%) for SAC herds was estimated. Since the Swiss control program only targets the virulent strains of D. nodosus, it was concluded that cattle, goats and SAC do not play a role in footrot epidemiology in Switzerland. Adult sheep were at higher risk of infection for virulent D. nodosus compared to lambs and yearlings. On herd level, risk factors for infection with virulent D. nodosus in sheep were earlier occurence of footrot, winter compared to summer and autumn, and goat contact on pasture. Liming pastures had a protective effect on D. nodosus infection. For benign D. nodosus, the TP in sheep was 6.3% (CI95%: 1.6-11.0%) and in cattle 88.4% (CI95%: 83.8-93.0%). The TP for benign D. nodosus in sheep farms was 2.8% (CI95%: 0.0-10.5%) and in cattle farms 95.9% (CI95%: 91.7-98.1%). In goat and SAC farms, the AP was 6.6% (CI95%: 3.4-11.5%) and 7.4% (CI95%: 3.8-13.1%), respectively. These findings could be relevant for wild ruminants such as Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex), which can develop clinical footrot after infection with benign D. nodosus. The findings of this study are crucial for assessing targeted disease control measures in Switzerland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flurin Ardüser
- Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gaia Moore-Jones
- Centre for Fish and Wildlife Health (FIWI), Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 122, Postfach, 3001 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefanie Gobeli Brawand
- Institute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 122, Postfach, 3001 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Salome Dürr
- Veterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Schwarzenburgstrasse 155, 3097 Liebefeld, Switzerland
| | - Adrian Steiner
- Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
- Centre for Fish and Wildlife Health (FIWI), Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Länggassstrasse 122, Postfach, 3001 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Patrik Zanolari
- Clinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bremgartenstrasse 109a, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Footrot vaccines and vaccination. Vaccine 2014; 32:3139-46. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2013] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
5
|
Forbes AB, Strobel H, Stamphoj I. Field studies on the elimination of footrot in sheep through whole flock treatments with gamithromycin. Vet Rec 2014; 174:146. [DOI: 10.1136/vr.102028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. B. Forbes
- Merial S.A.S; 29 Avenue Tony Garnier Lyon 69007 France
| | - H. Strobel
- Schafpraxis; Am Hopfenberg 8 Stoffenried D-89352 Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
The interaction of host genetics and disease processes in chronic livestock disease: a simulation model of ovine footrot. Prev Vet Med 2012. [PMID: 23194893 DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
A stochastic, individual-based, simulation model of footrot in a flock of 200 ewes was developed that included flock demography, disease processes, host genetic variation for traits influencing infection and disease processes, and bacterial contamination of the environment. Sensitivity analyses were performed using ANOVA to examine the contribution of unknown parameters to outcome variation. The infection rate and bacterial death rate were the most significant factors determining the observed prevalence of footrot, as well as the heritability of resistance. The dominance of infection parameters in determining outcomes implies that observational data cannot be used to accurately estimate the strength of genetic control of underlying traits describing the infection process, i.e. resistance. Further work will allow us to address the potential for genetic selection to control ovine footrot.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mills K, McClenaughan P, Morton A, Alley D, Lievaart J, Windsor PA, Egerton JR. Effect on time in quarantine of the choice of program for eradication of footrot from 196 sheep flocks in southern New South Wales. Aust Vet J 2012; 90:14-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2011.00872.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
8
|
Dhungyel O, Lehmann D, Whittington R. Pilot trials in Australia on eradication of footrot by flock specific vaccination. Vet Microbiol 2008; 132:364-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2008] [Revised: 05/23/2008] [Accepted: 05/26/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
9
|
Abstract
Ovine footrot remains the most important cause of lameness in sheep flocks in the UK, despite the existence of proven methods for the control of the disease. Recent research suggests that sheep farmers may be unaware of these methods and may allocate greater resources to treatment of footrot rather than to its prevention. Foot paring, topical treatments, vaccination and parenteral antibiotic therapy all have a role in treating sheep with advanced footrot infections, but prevention of severe infections is best achieved by the timely implementation of control programmes. These are usually based on footbathing and vaccination. For control programmes to be effective it is essential that the pathogenesis and epidemiology of footrot is understood and that control methods are implemented at appropriate times in the season, depending on climatic and pasture conditions. This article reviews these strategies and makes recommendations for steps to reduce the spread of footrot between flocks and to reduce the incidence of footrot within UK flocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Abbott
- The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|