Derivation of photochrome absorption spectra from absorbance difference measurements

Melanopsin bistability: a fly's eye technology in the human retina

In addition to rods and cones, the human retina contains light-sensitive ganglion cells that express melanopsin, a photopigment with signal transduction mechanisms similar to that of invertebrate rhabdomeric photopigments (IRP). Like fly rhodopsins, melanopsin acts as a dual-state photosensitive flip-flop in which light drives both phototransduction responses and chromophore photoregeneration that bestows independence from the retinoid cycle required by rods and cones to regenerate photoresponsiveness following bleaching by light. To explore the hypothesis that melanopsin in humans expresses the properties of a bistable photopigment in vivo we used the pupillary light reflex (PLR) as a tool but with methods designed to study invertebrate photoreceptors. We show that the pupil only attains a fully stabilized state of constriction after several minutes of light exposure, a feature that is consistent with typical IRP photoequilibrium spectra. We further demonstrate that previous exposure to long wavelength light increases, while short wavelength light decreases the amplitude of pupil constriction, a fundamental property of IRP difference spectra. Modelling these responses to invertebrate photopigment templates yields two putative spectra for the underlying R and M photopigment states with peaks at 481 nm and 587 nm respectively. Furthermore, this bistable mechanism may confer a novel form of "photic memory" since information of prior light conditions is retained and shapes subsequent responses to light. These results suggest that the human retina exploits fly-like photoreceptive mechanisms that are potentially important for the modulation of non-visual responses to light and highlights the ubiquitous nature of photoswitchable photosensors across living organisms.

Melanopsin-dependent nonvisual responses: evidence for photopigment bistability in vivo

In mammals, nonvisual responses to light have been shown to involve intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGC) that express melanopsin and that are modulated by input from both rods and cones. Recent in vitro evidence suggests that melanopsin possesses dual photosensory and photoisomerase functions, previously thought to be a unique feature of invertebrate rhabdomeric photopigments. In cultured cells that normally do not respond to light, heterologous expression of mammalian melanopsin confers light sensitivity that can be restored by prior stimulation with appropriate wavelengths. Using three different physiological and behavioral assays, we show that this in vitro property translates to in vivo, melanopsin-dependent nonvisual responses. We find that prestimulation with long-wavelength light not only restores but enhances single-unit responses of SCN neurons to 480-nm light, whereas the long-wavelength stimulus alone fails to elicit any response. Recordings in Opn4-/- mice confirm that melanopsin provides the main photosensory input to the SCN, and furthermore, demonstrate that melanopsin is required for response enhancement, because this capacity is abolished in the knockout mouse. The efficiency of the light-enhancement effect depends on wavelength, irradiance, and duration. Prior long-wavelength light exposure also enhances short-wavelength-induced phase shifts of locomotor activity and pupillary constriction, consistent with the expression of a photoisomerase-like function in nonvisual responses to light.

Initial field and energy flux in absorbing optical waveguides. II. Implications

We present here numerical estimates of the density and flux of energy based on physical parameters associated with the absorption properties of certain types of absorbing optical waveguides. These results are based on a theoretical formalism established previously for the initial field incident upon the entrance pupil of an absorbing optical waveguide. Based on these results, the mechanisms of confined energy transmission and possible cross talk between neighboring waveguides are discussed. Some comments on the behavior of Bessel functions with complex arguments are also included in the discussion.

The response to monochromatic light flashes of the oxygen consumption of honeybee drone photoreceptors

Local measurements of the fall in oxygen pressure on stimulation of slices of the retina of the honeybee drone by flashes of light were made with oxygen microelectrodes and used to calculate the kinetics of the extra oxygen consumption (delta QO2) induced by each flash. The action spectrum for delta QO2 was obtained from response-intensity curves in response to brief (40 ms) monochromatic light flashes. The action spectrum of receptor potentials was obtained with the same experimental conditions. The two action spectra match closely: they deviate slightly from the photosensitivity spectrum of the drone rhodopsin (R). The deviation is thought to be due to wavelength-dependent light scattering and absorption in the preparation. In these experiments, the visual pigment was first illuminated with orange light, which is known to convert the bistable drone photopigment predominantly to the R state from the metarhodopsin (M) state. When long (300-900 ms) light flashes were used to elicit delta QO2, the responses to different wavelengths could not be matched in time course (as for the short flashes). Flashes producing large R-to-M conversions produced a prolonged delta QO2. The prolongation did not occur after double flashes, which produced both large R-to-M and M-to-R conversions. Similar changes in the length of afterpotentials in the photoreceptor cells and in a long-lasting decrease in photoreceptor intracellular K+ activity were found after long single or double flashes. The results are interpreted to show that the initial event for stimulation by light of metabolism in the drone retina is the same as that for stimulation of electrical responses (i.e., absorption of photons by R). Absorption of photons by M can produce an inhibitory effect on this stimulation.

Does retinol serve a sensitizing function in insect photoreceptors?

Spectral sensitivity of the dorsal compound eye of Simuliid males (Nematocera) shows a maximum in the u.v. at 340 nm, and a shoulder or second, smaller maximum around 430 nm. The visual pigment--based on retinal and therefore a rhodopsin--has its absorption maximum at 430 nm. The 340 maximum is due to a sensitizing pigment that transfers energy to the visual pigment. The properties of the Simuliid-photoreceptor hence are similar to most of the photoreceptors in higher flies (Musca, Calliphora, Drosophila), that also have a u.v.-absorbing sensitizing pigment. The difference is that in Simuliids the sensitizing pigment is not 3-hydroxyretinol as in the higher flies but a different substance, most likely retinol.

Colour dependence of the early receptor potential and late receptor potential in scallop distal photoreceptor

1. Intracellular voltage and current responses to short (blue) and long (red) wave-length lights were measured in the distal hyperpolarizing photoreceptor (;off receptor') of the isolated and perfused scallop (Pecten irradians) retina.2. The early receptor potential (e.r.p.) was isolated by holding membrane potential at the reversal potential for the late receptor potential (l.r.p.) or by working at temperatures (< 5.0 degrees C) that abolished the l.r.p.3. The e.r.p., measured using intense flashes of white light, consisted of a positive phase followed by a negative phase, but was converted to a monophasic, negative-going wave following pre-adaptation with red light and to a monophasic, positive-going wave following pre-adaptation with blue light.4. The spectral sensitivity curve for the negative e.r.p. was maximum at 500 nm, whereas the spectral sensitivity curve for the positive e.r.p. was maximum at 575 nm.5. The positive or negative e.r.p.s approached their maximum amplitude exponentially when tested with red or blue flashes of increasing intensity. The results suggest that the positive (or negative) e.r.p. is proportional to the number of photopigment molecules photo-isomerized.6. The photosensitivity maximum of rhodopsin calculated at 500 nm, using the exponential constant and the spectral sensitivity data, was estimated to be 2.1 x 10(-16) cm(2) photon(-1), whereas the photosensitivity maximum of metarhodopsin calculated at 575 nm was estimated to be 2.6 x 10(-16) cm(2) photon(-1).7. In cells pre-adapted with white light, stimulation with blue light caused a hyperpolarizing l.r.p. which was followed by a prolonged hyperpolarizing after-potential (p.h.a.). Stimulation with red light under similar conditions caused an initial hyperpolarization which was followed by a small depolarization during the stimulus, but no after-potential.8. The duration of the p.h.a. was increased by pre-adaptation with a red light, which caused the maximum net transfer of metarhodopsin to rhodopsin; however, its decay was always complete in 5 min or less.9. The photo-isomerization of metarhodopsin by red light suppressed the p.h.a. and caused an after-depolarizing response that decayed in less than 1 min.10. The spectral sensitivity curve for the induction of the p.h.a. was maximum at 500 nm and corresponded to the spectral sensitivity for the negative e.r.p. and for the l.r.p. studied in the dark-adapted retina, whereas the spectral sensitivity curve for the suppression of the p.h.a. and for the induction of the after-depolarization was maximum at 575 nm and corresponded to the spectral sensitivity for the positive e.r.p.11. In photoreceptors clamped to the resting potential in normal ASW, the photo-isomerization of rhodopsin, in the absence of light absorption by metarhodopsin, activated a persistent outward current that had the same time course of decay as the p.h.a. The photo-isomerization of metarhodopsin suppressed the persistent outward current and activated an inward current whose decay took longer than the decay of the after-depolarizing response.12. In the absence of external Ca(2+) and Na(+) ions, the persistent outward current produced by light absorption by rhodopsin, and the inward current produced by light absorption by metarhodopsin, both reversed at the K(+) equilibrium potential. The results show that the induction of the prolonged hyperpolarizing after-potential and the after-depolarizing response involve only the movement of K(+) ions through the same light-dependent K(+) channels that determine the hyperpolarizing l.r.p. of the distal cells.

Photosensitivity spectrum of crayfish rhodopsin measured using fluorescence of metarhodopsin

Discrepancies exist among spectral measurements of sensitivity of crayfish photoreceptors, their absorption in situ, and the number and absorption spectra of crayfish photopigments that are extracted by digitonin solutions. We have determined the photosensitivity spectrum of crayfish rhodopsin in isolated rhabdoms using long wavelength fluorescence emission from crayfish metarhodopsin as an intrinsic probe. There is no measurable metarhodopsin in the dark-adapted receptor, so changes in the emission level are directly proportional to metarhodopsin concentration. We therefore used changes in metarhodopsin fluorescence to construct relaxation and saturation ("photoequilibrium") spectra, from which the photosensitivity spectrum of crayfish rhodopsin was calculated. This spectrum peaks at or approximately 530 nm and closely resembles the previously measured difference spectrum for total bleaches of dark-adapted rhabdoms. Measurements of the kinetics of changes in rhabdom fluorescence and in transmittance at 580 nm were compared with predictions derived from several model systems containing one or two photopigments. The comparison shows that only a single rhodopsin and its metarhodopsin are present in the main rhabdom of crayfish, and that other explanations must be sought for the multiple pigments seen in digitonin solution. The same analysis shows that there is no detectable formation of isorhodopsin in the rhabdom.