Phytochrome evolution: a phylogenetic tree with the first complete sequence of phytochrome from a cryptogamic plant (Selaginella martensii spring)

Phytochrome cytoplasmic signaling

Extensive studies in both lower and higher plants indicate that plant phytochrome photoreceptors signal not only by regulating transcription in the nucleus but also by acting within the cytoplasm, the latter signaling routes acting within minutes or even seconds and also providing directional information. Directional signals seem to arise from phytochromes attached anisotropically to the plasma membrane. Neochromes-phytochrome-phototropin hybrid photoreceptors probably attached to the plasma membrane-provide this signal in various ferns and perhaps certain algae but are absent from other groups. In mosses and probably higher plants too, a subpopulation of canonical phytochromes interact with phototropins at the plasma membrane and thereby steer directional responses. Phytochromes also seem able to regulate translation in the cytoplasm. This review discusses putative phytochrome functions in these contexts.

Characterization of cDNA of the liverwort phytochrome gene, and phytochrome involvement in the light-dependent and light-independent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase gene expression in Marchantia paleacea var. diptera

The cDNA of the phytochrome gene in the liverwort Marchantia paleacea var. diptera (MpdPHY1) was isolated. MpdPHY1 encoded a conventional phytochrome apoprotein. The MpdPHY1 transcript was accumulated in the dark and suppressed in the light. The degradation of the MpdPHY1 transcript by red light irradiation had red/far-red reversibility, suggesting that the liverwort phytochrome gene expression was regulated by a phytochrome. Northern blot analysis of the transcripts in cells irradiated by red/far-red light revealed that the liverwort phytochrome was involved in the expressions of chlB, chlL, chlN, or por, which encode subunits of light-independent and light-dependent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase, respectively.

EVOLUTION OF LIGHT-REGULATED PLANT PROMOTERS

In this review, we address the phylogenetic and structural relationships between light-responsive promoter regions from a range of plant genes, that could explain both their common dependence on specific photoreceptor-associated transduction pathways and their functional versatility. The well-known multipartite light-responsive elements (LREs) of flowering plants share sequences very similar to motifs in the promoters of orthologous genes from conifers, ferns, and mosses, whose genes are expressed in absence of light. Therefore, composite LREs have apparently evolved from cis-regulatory units involved in other promoter functions, a notion with significant implications to our understanding of the structural and functional organization of angiosperm LREs.

Homology at the amino acid level between plant phytochromes and a regulator of asexual sporulation in Emericella (= Aspergillus) nidulans

Protein sequence comparison between the N-terminal regions of the BRLA (bristle A) protein of the ascomycete fungus Aspergillus nidulans and a number of plant phytochromes has demonstrated a moderate level of sequence similarity. The region of similarity corresponds to the phytochrome domains believed to be responsible for photoreception and which undergo light-induced conformational changes, although a putative chromophore-binding site is not evident. Over 22% of residues are conserved and 24% conservatively substituted between residues 1 and 272 of BRLA and the N-terminal domains of Type 1 phytochromes from dicotyledonous species. A lower level of similarity, but over the same region, is observed in comparison with a wider range of phytochromes. Given the known role of BRLA as a transcriptional activator involved in conidiation, and the red/far-red reversible photoregulation of this developmental process, the similarity with phytochromes may be significant.

Mosses do express conventional, distantly B-type-related phytochromes. Phytochrome of Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.)

We have screened a cDNA library of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) for phytochrome sequences. The isolated sequences turned out to encode a phytochrome dissimilar to the phytochrome type postulated for the moss Ceratodon [(1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 1003-1017] Physcomitrella phytochrome was completely alignable to fern phytochrome (Selaginella) and phytochromes of higher plants. The frequency of clones encoding this phytochrome indicated that a Ceratodon-like type should only be expressed, if at all, with lower frequencies than the sequenced phytochrome cDNA. Sequence differences between lower plant phytochromes are small as compared to phytochrome types of higher plants.

Signal transduction by phytochrome: phytochromes have a module related to the transmitter modules of bacterial sensor proteins

A C-terminal section of phytochromes turned out to share sequence homologies with the full length of the transmitter modules (about 250 amino acids) of bacterial sensor proteins. Coinciding hydrophobic clusters within the homologous domains imply that the overall folding of the two different types of peptides is similar. Hence, phytochromes appear to possess the structural prerequisites to transmit signals in a way bacterial sensor proteins do. The bacterial sensor proteins are known to be environmental stimuli-regulated kinases belonging to two-component systems. After sensing a stimulus by the N-terminal part of the sensor protein, conformational alterations confer the signal to its (mostly) C-terminal transmitter module which in turn is transitionally autophosphorylated at a conserved histidine. From the histidine the phosphate is transferred to the receiver module of a system-specific regulator protein which eventually acts on transcription or enzyme activity. The histidine is not conserved in phytochromes. Instead, a conserved tyrosine is found spatially very close to the histidine position. This tyrosine might play the role of histidine, and kinase function might be associated with this part of phytochrome. In spite of this divergence, the structural similarities point to a common evolutionary origin of the phytochrome and bacterial modules.