Normal brain tissue response to photodynamic therapy using aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate in the rat

Mitochondrial dysfunction mediates neuronal cell response to DMMB photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a process in which a photosensitizer (PS) is exposed to specific wavelengths and generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) which act within nanometers. The low invasive nature and directed cytotoxicity of this approach render it attractive to the treatment of different conditions, including the ones that affect the central nervous system (CNS). The effect of PDT on healthy neurons is one main concern over its use in the CNS, since neuronal-like cells were shown to be particularly sensitive to certain PSs. Among available PSs, 1,9-dimethyl-methylene blue (DMMB) stands out as being resistant to reduction to its inactive leuco form and by being able to produce high levels of singlet‑oxygen. In this study, we aimed to investigate DMMB photodamage mechanisms in the hippocampal cell line HT22. Our results demonstrate that DMMB-PDT decrease in cell viability was linked with an increase in cell death and overall ROS production. Besides, it resulted in a significant increase in mitochondrial ROS production and decreased mitochondria membrane potential. Furthermore, DMMB-PDT significantly increased the presence of acidic autolysosomes, which was accompanied by an increase in ATG1 and ATG8 homologue GaBarap1 expression, and decreased DRAM1 expression. Taken together our results indicated that mitochondrial and autophagic dysfunction underlie DMMB-PDT cytotoxicity in neuronal cells.

Photodynamic therapy in neurosurgery: a review

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been investigated extensively, both experimentally and clinically, as an adjunctive treatment in the neuro-oncological field. It is based on the more selective accumulation of a photosensitizer in malignant than normal tissue with low systemic toxicity. Subsequent light activation induces photo-oxidation, followed by selective tumour destruction via vascular and direct cellular mechanisms. Malignant brain tumours carry a lethal prognosis with a median survival of 15 months despite surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. PDT is therefore a logical therapeutic concept for brain tumours infiltrating into normal brain. In this review, all the available data on patients treated with haematoporphyrin derivative-mediated PDT are critically analysed. Over 310 patients have been reported in the literature suffering from primary or recurrent malignant brain tumours which were treated with PDT following tumour resection in open clinical phase I/II trials. This number includes 58 patients treated at our own institution. Variations in the treatment protocols make evaluation scientifically difficult; however, there is a clear trend of increased median survival after surgical resection and one single photodynamic treatment. PDT is generally well tolerated and side effects consist of moderate increased intracranial pressure and prolonged skin sensitivity to direct sunlight. The current available data indicate that PDT is a safe treatment, which is well tolerated by the patients and yields an improvement in survival of those with malignant brain tumours. Conclusive information can be expected from controlled clinical trials which are currently being designed. The results raise the hope that PDT will be a valuable addition to the armamentarium for the treatment of cerebral malignancies.

Light-emitting diodes as a light source for intraoperative photodynamic therapy

The development of more cost-effective light sources for photodynamic therapy of brain tumors would be of benefit for both research and clinical applications. In this study, the use of light-emitting diode arrays for photodynamic therapy of brain tumors with Photofrin porfimer sodium was investigated. An inflatable balloon device with a light-emitting diode (LED) tip was constructed. These LEDs are based on the new semiconductor aluminum gallium arsenide. They can emit broad-spectrum red light at high power levels with a peak wavelength of 677 nm and a bandwidth of 25 nm. The balloon was inflated with 0.1% intralipid, which served as a light-scattering medium. Measurements of light flux at several points showed a high degree of light dispersion. The spectral emission of this probe was then compared with the absorption spectrum of Photofrin. This analysis showed that the light absorbed by Photofrin with the use of the LED source was 27.5% of that absorbed with the use of the monochromatic 630-nm light. Thus, to achieve an energy light dose equivalent to that of a laser light source, the LED light output must be increased by a factor of 3.63. This need for additional energy is the difference between a 630- and 677-nm absorption of Photofrin. Using the LED probe and the laser balloon adapter, a comparison of brain stem toxicity in canines was conducted. LED and laser light showed the same signs of toxicity at equivalent light energy and Photofrin doses. The maximal tolerated dose of Photofrin was 1.6 mg/kg, using 100 J/cm2 of light energy administered by laser or LED. This study concludes that LEDs are a suitable light source for photodynamic therapy of brain tumors with Photofrin. In addition, LEDs have the potential to be highly efficient light sources for second-generation photosensitizers with absorption wavelengths closer to the LED peak emission.

The sensitivity of normal brain and intracranially implanted VX2 tumour to interstitial photodynamic therapy

The applicability and limitations of a photodynamic threshold model, used to describe quantitatively the in vivo response of tissues to photodynamic therapy, are currently being investigated in a variety of normal and malignant tumour tissues. The model states that tissue necrosis occurs when the number of photons absorbed by the photosensitiser per unit tissue volume exceeds a threshold. New Zealand White rabbits were sensitised with porphyrin-based photosensitisers. Normal brain or intracranially implanted VX2 tumours were illuminated via an optical fibre placed into the tissue at craniotomy. The light fluence distribution in the tissue was measured by multiple interstitial optical fibre detectors. The tissue concentration of the photosensitiser was determined post mortem by absorption spectroscopy. The derived photodynamic threshold values for normal brain are significantly lower than for VX2 tumour for all photosensitisers examined. Neuronal damage is evident beyond the zone of frank necrosis. For Photofrin the threshold decreases with time delay between photosensitiser administration and light treatment. No significant difference in threshold is found between Photofrin and haematoporphyrin derivative. The threshold in normal brain (grey matter) is lowest for sensitisation by 5 delta-aminolaevulinic acid. The results confirm the very high sensitivity of normal brain to porphyrin photodynamic therapy and show the importance of in situ light fluence monitoring during photodynamic irradiation.