Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy: comparison of red and green light distribution and toxicity

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with photodynamic therapy: Systematic review of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis results when tumour cells implant and grow within the peritoneal cavity. Treatment and prognosis vary based on the primary cancer. Although therapy with intention-to-cure is offered to selective patients using cytoreductive surgery with chemotherapy, the prognosis remains poor for most of the patients. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a cancer-therapeutic modality where a photosensitiser is administered to patients and exerts a cytotoxic effect on cancer cells when excited by light of a specific wavelength. It has potential application in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the evidence of using PDT to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis in both animals and humans (Medline/EMBASE searched in June 2017).

RESULTS

Three human and 25 animal studies were included. Phase I and II human trials using first-generation photosensitisers showed that applying PDT after surgical debulking in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis is feasible with some clinical benefits. The low tumour-selectivity of the photosensitisers led to significant toxicities mainly capillary leak syndrome and bowel perforation. In animal studies, PDT improved survival by 15-300%, compared to control groups. PDT led to higher tumour necrosis values (categorical values 0-4 [4=highest]: PDT 3.4±1.0 vs. control 0.4±0.6, p<0.05) and reduced tumour size (residual tumour size is 10% of untreated controls, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PDT has potential in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is limited by its narrow therapeutic window and possible serious side effects. Recent improvement in tumour-selectivity and light delivery systems is promising, but further development is needed before PDT can be routinely applied for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Photodynamic therapy of ovarian cancer peritoneal metastasis with hexaminolevulinate: a toxicity study

CONTEXT

While photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis, its use is often limited because of the toxicity of photosensitizers. In this study, safety of PDT with hexaminoevulinate (HAL), a second generation photosensitizer, is assessed.

METHODS

PDT of the peritoneal cavity was performed in a rat model of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Rats were treated according to different protocols: with full or half HAL dose, after intraperitoneal or oral administration of HAL, 4 or 8h after its injection, using red or green light, after protection of the liver or cooling of the abdominal wall. Toxicity was assessed by blood tests quantifying hematocrit, liver and muscular enzymes and by pathological examination of abdominal and intrathoracic organs after treatment. The results were analyzed in the light of quantification of fluorescence and protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) content of the same organs.

RESULTS

PDT with HAL induced rhabdomyolysis, intestinal necrosis and liver function test anomalies, leading to death in 2 out of 34 rats. The liver and the intestine contained high levels of PPIX (3-5 times more than tumor nodules).

CONCLUSION

HAL PDT lacked specificity. However, the strategy associating diagnosis, treatment and evaluation of the results in one single procedure was effective and should be tested with other photosensitizers.

Temoporfin (Foscan®, 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin)--a second-generation photosensitizer

This review traces the development and study of the second-generation photosensitizer 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin through to its acceptance and clinical use in modern photodynamic (cancer) therapy. The literature has been covered up to early 2011.

Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy mediated by a fullerene in a mouse model of abdominal dissemination of colon adenocarcinoma

Functionalized fullerenes represent a new class of photosensitizer (PS) that is being investigated for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of various diseases, including cancer. We tested the hypothesis that fullerenes could be used to mediate PDT of intraperitoneal (IP) carcinomatosis in a mouse model. In humans this form of cancer responds poorly to standard treatment and manifests as a thin covering of tumor nodules on intestines and on other abdominal organs. We used a colon adenocarcinoma cell line (CT26) stably expressing luciferase to allow monitoring of IP tumor burden in BALB/c mice by noninvasive real-time optical imaging using a sensitive low-light camera. IP injection of a preparation of N-methylpyrrolidinium-fullerene formulated in Cremophor-EL micelles, followed by white-light illumination delivered through the peritoneal wall (after creation of a skin flap), produced a statistically significant reduction in bioluminescence and a survival advantage in mice.

FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR

This team of investigators report on functionalized fullerenes, to be used as photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy and demonstrate the efficacy of this method in an intraperitoneal carcinomatosis mouse model.

Evaluation of the photosensitizer Tookad for photodynamic therapy on the Syrian golden hamster cheek pouch model: light dose, drug dose and drug-light interval effects

We have evaluated the efficacy of the new photosensitizer (PS) Tookad in photodynamic therapy (PDT) in vivo. This PS is a palladium-bacteriopheophorbide presenting absorption peaks at 762 and 538 nm. The light dose, drug dose and drug injection-light irradiation interval (DLI), ranging between 100 and 300 J/cm2, 1 and 5 mg/kg and from 10 to 240 min, respectively, were varied, and the response to PDT was analyzed by staging the macroscopic response and by the histological examination of the sections of the irradiated cheek pouch. The level of PDT response, macroscopically and histologically, shows a strong dependence on the DLI, light dose and drug dose at the applied conditions in the normal hamster cheek pouch. A decay of the tissular response with increasing DLI is observed corresponding to a time of half-maximum response ranging from 10 to 120 min, depending on drug dose and light dose. The tissues affected at the lowest doses are predominantly the vascularized diffuse connective tissue situated between the inner and outer striated muscle (SM) layers as well as these muscle layers themselves. The highest response at the shortest DLI and the absence of a measurable response at DLI longer than 240 min at 300 J/cm2 and drug dose of 5 mg/kg are characteristics of a predominantly vascular effect of this PS. This observation suggests that Tookad could be effective in PDT of vascularized lesions or pathologies associated with the proliferation of neovessels.

Comparison between isotropic and nonisotropic dosimetry systems during intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

On-line monitoring of light fluence during intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy (IP PDT) is crucial for safe light delivery. A flat photodiode-based dosimetry system is compared with an isotropic detector-based system in patients undergoing IP PDT.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flat photodiodes and spherical detectors were placed side by side in the abdomen, for simultaneous light dosimetry in 19 patients. Tissue phantom experiments were performed to provide a preliminary estimate of the tissue optical properties of the peritoneum.

RESULTS

The conversion factor between systems for 630-nm light was found to be 1.7 +/- 0.12. The mu(eff) of the tissues in the abdomen is estimated to vary between 0.5 cm(-1) to 1.4 cm(-1) assuming a mu(s)' = 7 cm(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

The measured conversion factor should allow for comparison of light fluences with future clinical protocols that use an isotropic-based detector system. Differences in the optical properties of the underlying tissues may contribute to the variability in light measurements.

Intraperitoneal photoimmunotherapy of ovarian carcinoma xenografts in nude mice using charged photoimmunoconjugates

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of photoimmunoconjugates with cationic and anionic molecular charges on intraperitoneal photoimmunotherapy of ovarian cancer xenografts in nude mice.

METHODS

The photosensitizer chlorin(e6) (c(e6)) was conjugated via a poly-l-lysine linker to the F(ab')(2) fragment of the murine anti-ovarian cancer monoclonal antibody OC125, resulting in a photoimmunoconjugate with a pronounced cationic charge. Alternatively, by succinylating the poly-l-lysine conjugate, a photoimmunoconjugate with a pronounced anionic charge was obtained. A murine model of ovarian cancer derived from intraperitoneal inoculation of NIH:OVCAR-5 cells was employed. The conjugate was injected intraperitoneally followed after 3 h by red light delivered through a fiber into the peritoneal cavity. These photoimmunotherapy treatments were repeated three times, and the results obtained with the anionic and cationic photoimmunoconjugates were compared with those obtained with free c(e6) and control. The extent of residual macroscopic disease and death from disease were the evaluable outcomes for tumoricidal and survival studies, respectively.

RESULTS

In contrast to other intraperitoneal photosensitizers, mice showed no systemic toxicity or morbidity from the treatment. In this initial study the mean residual tumor weights in all treatment groups ranged from 33 to 73 mg, as compared with 330 mg in untreated controls (P < 0.0001), and the response to the cationic conjugate was significantly better than that to the anionic conjugate or free c(e6) (P < 0.005). The median survival for mice treated with cationic photoimmunoconjugate was 41 days, compared with 35 days in controls (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Photoimmunotherapy with a cationic photoimmunoconjugate produces results superior to those obtained with an anionic conjugate, and further optimization of the treatment regimen may lead to a potential treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

Targeted photodestruction of human colon cancer cells using charged 17.1A chlorin e6 immunoconjugates

The goal of this study was to develop a strategy for the selective destruction of colorectal cancer cells. Towards this end, photoimmunoconjugates were prepared between the anti-colon cancer monoclonal antibody 17.1A and the photosensitizer (PS) chlorin(e6) (c(e6)). Polylysine linkers bearing several c(e6) molecules were covalently attached in a site-specific manner to partially reduced IgG molecules, which allowed photoimmunoconjugates to bear either cationic or anionic charges. The conjugates retained immunoreactivity as shown by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and by competition studies with native antibody. The overall charge on the photoimmunoconjugate was an important determinant of PS delivery. The cationic photoimmunoconjugate delivered 4 times more c(e6) to the cells than the anionic photoimmunoconjugate, and both 17.1A conjugates showed, in comparison to non-specific rabbit IgG conjugates, selectivity for antigen-positive target cells. Illumination with only 3 J cm(-2) of 666 nm light reduced the number of colony forming cells by more than 90% for the cationic 17.1A conjugate and by 73% for the anionic 17.1A conjugate after incubation with 1 microM c(e6) equivalent of the respective conjugates. By contrast, 1 microM free c(e6) gave only a 35% reduction in colonies. These data suggest photoimmunoconjugates may have applications in photoimmunotherapy where destruction of colorectal cancer cells is required.

Cationic photoimmunoconjugates between monoclonal antibodies and hematoporphyrin: selective photodestruction of ovarian cancer cells

The photosensitizer hematoporphyrin (HP) was site specifically attached to a murine monoclonal antibody (MAb) fragment OC125F(ab?)(2) directed against ovarian cancer cells and to nonspecific rabbit immunoglobulin G. The photoimmunoconjugates were positively charged and were purified by column chromatography. The OC125F(ab?)(2) conjugate retained immunoreactivity with human ovarian cancer cells, and the binding was competed with unmodified MAb. Phototoxicity paralleled the cellular uptake with the OC125F(ab?)(2) conjugate and the light showing selective killing of target cells compared with nontarget cells. Nontargeted conjugates and free HP produced lower levels of phototoxicity and showed no selectivity.