Covered removable self-expandable metal [corrected] stents for the treatment of refractory benign biliary disease

Single brand, fully-covered, self-expandable metal stent for the treatment of benign biliary disease: when should stents be removed?

The two most relevant endoscopic treatable benign biliary diseases (BBD) are benign biliary strictures (BBSs) and biliary leaks (BLs), often associated with high morbidity. The most common endoscopic treatment for biliary strictures involves placement of multiple plastic stents (PSs), with or without balloon dilation, followed by planned exchange of the stents. Thus, there continues to be high interest in pursuing alternative endoscopic approaches that may achieve better results with fewer interventions. In this setting, the use of a fully-covered, self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) is an attractive alternative to single or multiple PSs for the treatment of BBDs. A single metal stent can remain in place for a longer period of time before removal; however, the maximum time the stent can be remain in place is still not well defined. The aim of this review is to determine the removal time of the TaeWoong® FCSEMS, placed for BBD. According to our data analysis, considering the absence of loss of the covering of the FCSEMS and of any adverse events during and after stent removal, leaving the TaeWoong medical FCSEMS in situ for an 8 months' period seems to be acceptable for benign biliary diseases. Further studies need to evaluate their removability at 1 year.

Clinical outcome of endoscopic covered metal stenting for resolution of benign biliary stricture: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Management of benign biliary stricture is challenging. Endoscopic therapy has evolved as the first-line treatment for various benign biliary strictures. However, covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of benign biliary stricture. With this goal, we conducted the present systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic stenting with CSEMS in the treatment of benign biliary stricture.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases.

RESULTS

In total, 37 studies (1677 patients) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Pooled stricture resolutions were achieved in 83% of cases. Median stent dwelling time was 4.4 months, with median endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions of 2.0. Stricture recurrence at 4-year follow up was 11% (95% CI, 8-14%). Pooled complication rate was 23% (95% CI, 20-26%).

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of CSEMS is effective in the treatment of benign biliary stricture with relatively short stenting duration and low long-term stricture recurrence rate. However, more prospectively randomized studies are required to confirm the results.

Covered metal stents in endoscopic therapy of biliary complications after liver transplantation

There is growing interest in using covered self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of benign biliary conditions, and the presence of anastomotic biliary strictures and leaks after liver transplantation provide a valuable opportunity for testing them. The performance of the stents is encouraging, and the technical success rate is high. They provide larger diameter dilation and are easily removed, and can potentially limit costs by reducing the number of procedures needed to treat anastomotic biliary strictures. However, drawbacks such as sub-optimal tolerability and migration may affect both patient management and costs. New stent designs are currently being evaluated. Randomized controlled trials and cost-effectiveness analyses comparing covered metal stents with multiple plastic stent endotherapy are warranted in order to define the role of the former as first-line or rescue treatment.

Outcome of stenting in biliary and pancreatic benign and malignant diseases: A comprehensive review

Endoscopic stenting has become a widely method for the management of various malignant and benign pancreatico-biliary disorders. Biliary and pancreatic stents are devices made of plastic or metal used primarily to establish patency of an obstructed bile or pancreatic duct and may also be used to treat biliary or pancreatic leaks, pancreatic fluid collections and to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. In this review, relevant literature search and expert opinions have been used to evaluate the outcome of stenting in biliary and pancreatic benign and malignant diseases.

The use of double lasso, fully covered self-expandable metal stents with new "anchoring flap" system in the treatment of benign biliary diseases

BACKGROUND

Many benign biliary diseases (BBD) can be treated with fully covered, self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) but stent migration occurs in up to 35.7 %. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the rate of, safety and effectiveness and stent migration of a new biliary FCSEMS with an anti-migration flap (FCSEMS-AF) in patients with BBD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study from four Italian referral endoscopy centers of 32 consecutive patients (10 females and 22 males; mean age: 60.1 ± 14.8 years; range: 32-84 years) with BBD who were offered endoscopic placement of a FCSEMS-AF as first-line therapy.

RESULTS

Were 24 strictures and 8 leaks. Stent placement was technically successful in 32/32 patients (100 %). Immediate clinical improvement was seen in all 32 patients (100 %). One late stent migration occurred (3.3 %). FCSEMS-AF were removed from 30 of the 32 patients (93.7 %) at a mean (± SD) of 124.4 ± 84.2 days (range: 10-386 days) after placement. All patients remained clinically and biochemically well at 1- and 3-month follow-up. One patient (3.3 %) with a post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy stricture developed distal stent migration at 125 days.

CONCLUSION

This new FCSEMS with anti-migration flap seems to be a safe and effective first-line treatment option for patients with BBD.

Covered self-expanding metal stents may be preferable to plastic stents in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis-related biliary strictures: a systematic review comparing 2 methods of stent therapy in benign biliary strictures

BACKGROUND

Covered self-expanding metal stents (CSEMS) are being increasingly used in the endoscopic treatment of benign biliary strictures (BBS). There is no solid evidence yet to support their routine use.

GOALS

To evaluate feasibility, success rate, and complications of CSEMS compared with multiple plastic stents (PS) in BBS in a systematic review.

STUDY

A systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, Scopus, and Embase) for studies published from 2000 to 2012 combined to hand-search of reference lists resulted 4977 articles. Out of 99 potentially relevant studies selected for full-text review, 12 CSEMS (376 patients) and 13 PS studies (570 patients) met the final inclusion criteria. A systematic review comparing the 2 methods was made using proportion meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A tendency to successful use of CSEMS in strictures related to chronic pancreatitis (CP) was shown: clinical success of 77% and 33% [95% confidence interval (CI), 61%-94% vs. 4%-63%, P=0.06] was achieved with CSEMS and PS at 12 months follow-up, respectively. There were no differences in the success rates of other etiologies except CP or in the early complications. In CSEMS, incidence of late adverse events was lower in CP-related strictures (3% vs. 67%, 95% CI, 0%-13% vs. 17%-99%, P=0.02). The median number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies was lower with CSEMSs: 1.5 versus 3.9 (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved clinical success with fewer endoscopic sessions and corresponding complication rate may be achieved with CSEMS treatment compared with PS in BBS secondary to CP. In other BBS etiologies, this systematic review remains inconclusive.

Managing the post-liver transplantation anastomotic biliary stricture: multiple plastic versus metal stents: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic biliary strictures (ABSs) are common after liver transplantation, especially with living donors. The strategy of balloon dilation and multiple plastic stents (MPSs) is effective in treating ABSs, but requires multiple ERCPs with the associated risks, cost, and patient burden. Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) have been increasingly used in this setting. However, it is not clear whether there are definite advantages of using SEMSs over MPSs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of MPSs and SEMSs in ABS after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

DESIGN

Systematic review by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.

PATIENTS

OLT and LDLT patients.

INTERVENTIONS

MPSs versus SEMSs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Stricture resolution and adverse event rates.

RESULTS

Eight studies (446 patients) using MPSs in OLT, 3 studies (120 patients) using MPSs in LDLT, and 10 studies (200 patients) using SEMSs fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The stricture resolution rates were highest (94%-100%) when MPS duration was 12 months or longer. The stricture resolution rates with SEMSs in OLT patients were also high when stent duration was 3 months or longer (80%-95%) compared with a duration less than 3 months (53%-88%). Although the overall adverse event rates were low, the overall SEMS migration rate was significant at 16%.

LIMITATIONS

No randomized, controlled trials were identified; only small case series using either MPSs or SEMSs were included.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SEMSs appeared to be a promising option in the endoscopic management of ABSs after liver transplantation, current evidence does not suggest a clear advantage of SEMS use over MPSs for this indication.