Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Resistant Hypertension

Assessment of hypertension in kidney transplantation by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hypertension (HTN) is common following renal transplantation and it is associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular (CV) and graft health. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is the preferred method to characterize blood pressure (BP) status, since HTN misclassification by office BP (OBP) is quite common in this population. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at determining the clinical utility of 24-h ABPM and its potential implications for the management of HTN in this population.

Methods

Ovid-MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for interventional or observational studies enrolling adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) undergoing 24-h ABP readings compared with OBP or home BP. The main outcome was the proportion of KTRs diagnosed with HTN by ABPM, home or OBP recordings. Additionally, day-night BP variability and dipper/non-dipper status were assessed.

Results

Forty-two eligible studies (4115 participants) were reviewed. A cumulative analysis including 27 studies (3481 participants) revealed a prevalence of uncontrolled HTN detected by ABPM of 56% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46-65%]. The pooled prevalence of uncontrolled HTN according to OBP was 47% (95% CI 36-58%) in 25 studies (3261 participants). Very few studies reported on home BP recordings. The average concordance rate between OBP and ABPM measurements in classifying patients as controlled or uncontrolled hypertensive was 66% (95% CI 59-73%). ABPM revealed HTN phenotypes among KTRs. Two pooled analyses of 11 and 10 studies, respectively, revealed an average prevalence of 26% (95% CI 19-33%) for masked HTN (MHT) and 10% (95% CI 6-17%) for white-coat HTN (WCH). The proportion of non-dippers was variable across the 28 studies that analysed dipping status, with an average prevalence of 54% (95% CI 45-63%).

Conclusions

In our systematic review, comparison of OBP versus ABP measurements disclosed a high proportion of MHT, uncontrolled HTN and, to a lesser extent, WCH in KTRs. These results suggest that HTN is not adequately diagnosed and controlled by OBP recordings in this population. Furthermore, the high prevalence of non-dippers confirmed that circadian rhythm is commonly disturbed in KTRs.

Significance of white-coat and masked hypertension in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease

Hypertension is a frequent and modifiable cardiovascular risk factor with a cyclic relationship with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and control of high blood pressure are all mandatory not only in CKD but also in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As demonstrated by studies using population and hypertensive patients, white-coat hypertension (WCHT) and masked hypertension (MHT) carry a particular degree of risk. The advantages of ambulatory techniques in the management and prognostic stratification of patients with CKD and ESRD have also been recognized. However, most of the evidence underlines the importance of nocturnal hypertension and neglects WCHT and MHT. The absence of specific reports involving untreated and treated patients hinders the ability to significantly discriminate WCHT from the white-coat effect and MHT from masked uncontrolled hypertension. The heterogeneous definitions that are used add additional difficulty in translating experimental evidence into clinical practice. Reaching a consensus in definitions is mandatory for designing future research. Cross-sectional studies underscore the frequency of misdiagnosis, potentially leading to undertreatment (MHT) and overtreatment (WCHT) in renal disease. The divergent prevalence of WCHT and MHT reported in CKD could be related to the diverse definitions of hypertension and the heterogeneity of the pathologies pooled under the CKD definition. Even in the absence of randomized clinical trials specifically addressing this issue, the scarce longitudinal studies confirm that WCHT carries a risk close to that of sustained normotension, whereas MHT is associated with a risk close or identical to that of sustained hypertension.

Home and ambulatory blood pressure in resistant hypertension

Since their introduction in the clinical setting home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements have gained growing popularity in the diagnosis and treatment of essential hypertension for a number of reasons. These reasons include: 1) the lack of the so-called "white-coat effect", 2) the ability of the two approaches to provide information on blood pressure phenomena of prognostic value, and 3) the close relationship of the derived values with the risk of developing fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events. These features also apply to resistant hypertension, in which these approaches allow a precise definition of the diagnosis of this clinical condition, by excluding the presence of white-coat hypertension. Assessment of "out-of-office" blood pressure also allows us to define the patterns of blood pressure variability in this clinical condition as well as its relationships with target organ damage. Finally, home as well as ambulatory blood pressure measurements allow us to investigate the effects of therapeutic interventions, including those associated with the radiofrequency ablation of renal nerves. The present paper will provide a critical review of the main features of home and ambulatory blood pressure measurement in resistant hypertension, highlighting their main advantages as compared to office blood pressure. The prognostic significance, relationships with target organ damage and implications for treatment will also be discussed.

Clinical characteristics of resistant hypertension evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Strict control of blood pressure is important to prevent cardiovascular disease, although it is sometimes difficult to decrease blood pressure to target levels. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of resistant hypertension evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. One hundred in-hospital patients, whose 24-hour average blood pressure was higher than 130/80 mmHg even after treatment with more than three antihypertensive drugs, were included in the present analysis. Circadian variation of blood pressure was evaluated by nocturnal fall in systolic blood pressure. Average blood pressures of all patients were high in both daytime and nighttime, 150.0/82.9 and 143.8/78.2 mmHg, respectively. Twenty patients had been treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. In 63 patients out of the other 80 patients (79%), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was also decreased (<60 mL/min/1.73 m²). The patients classified into dipper, non-dipper, riser and extreme-dipper were 20%, 43%, 34% and 3%, respectively. In addition, in 17 patients whose eGFR was preserved, 12 patients showed a non-dipper or riser pattern, suggesting that it was difficult to account for this altered circadian blood pressure variation only by renal dysfunction. These results show that a large number of the patients with resistant hypertension suffered from renal dysfunction, although it was difficult to explain altered circadian blood pressure variation based on renal dysfunction alone.

The possibility of resistant hypertension during the treatment of hypertensive patients

Patients with poorly controlled hypertension despite taking at least three different kinds of anti-hypertensive drugs, including diuretics, are considered to have resistant hypertension (RH). The prevalence of RH was reported to be 13% in the Japanese J-HOME study. The incidences of RH in younger and older Japanese individuals should be prospectively investigated in the near future. RH is associated with poor outcomes and various cardiovascular events. In addition, it is frequently associated with older age, obesity, sleep apnea, long-term hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, reduced renal function, microalbuminuria and left ventricular hypertrophy. Some cases of RH exhibit high levels of aldosterone and cortisol, suggesting that endocrine hypertension should be ruled out among RH patients. Carotid baroreceptor activation and renal sympathetic denervation have recently been developed as treatments for RH. In conclusion, we should consider the possibility of RH during the treatment of hypertensive patients who do not achieve appropriate blood pressure control, in order to avoid the early onset of fatal cardiovascular events and reduce medical costs.