|
1
|
Abston E, Hon S, Rodriguez-Lopez J, Moll M, Lanuti M, Farber HW, Wilson KC. Treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia - A case series and systematic review. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2021; 68:102033. [PMID: 33895318 DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), a rare complication of HHT is associated with poor outcome. There are no trials to date that have investigated whether pulmonary vasodilator therapy improves hemodynamics or survival in this disease. OBJECTIVE To determine whether pulmonary vasodilator therapy improves survival, exercise capacity, or hemodynamics in HHT patients with pre-capillary PH. METHODS We performed a before-and-after observational study on a multicenter cohort of subjects with HHT-PAH who received intravenous prostanoid therapy. We then conducted a systematic review, searching Medline and EMBASE through December 2019. Studies that enrolled HHT-PAH subjects and reported treatment outcomes were selected. PROSPERO #158179. RESULTS Twenty-one articles were selected. Studies were before-and-after observational studies, case reports, and case series. Among all subjects with HHT-PAH, both mPAP (65 ± 19 pre-treatment vs 51 ± 16 mmHg post-treatment p = 0.04) and PVR (12 ± 6 pre-treatment vs 8 ± 4 WU post-treatment p = 0.01) improved with treatment. The mPAP improved with either oral (57 ± 17 pre-treatment versus 44 ± 13 mmHg post-treatment, p = 0.03) or intravenous (80 ± 15 pre-treatment versus 64 ± 16 mmHg post-treatment, p = 0.017) therapy. PVR also improved with either oral (10 ± 4 pre-treatment versus 6 ± 3 WU post-treatment, p = 0.004) or intravenous (17 ± 5 pre-treatment versus 10 ± 4 WU post-treatment, p = 0.04) therapy. Survival among HHT-PAH patients who received oral or intravenous therapy was not different (p = 0.2). Unadjusted survival among HHT-PAH patients was longer than that of IPAH patients (p = 0.008). There was no difference in side effects among HHT-PAH patient who received oral or intravenous therapy (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION Pulmonary vasodilator therapy is effective in improving hemodynamics of subjects with HHT-PAH and was not associated with increased risk of side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Abston
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Thoracic Cancers, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Stephanie Hon
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Josanna Rodriguez-Lopez
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matt Moll
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Lanuti
- Center for Thoracic Cancers, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Harrison W Farber
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, And Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin C Wilson
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|