Educating dentists about fissure sealants: effects on knowledge, attitudes, and use

Dentists' levels of evidence-based clinical knowledge and attitudes about using pit-and-fissure sealants

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence of pit-and-fissure sealants in children in the United States is low, the problem is magnified in low-income children. A small proportion of Florida's low-income children receive any preventive dental services, including sealants. The authors conducted a cross-sectional study to assess whether Florida's dentists provide sealants as a preventive measure in their practices, their attitudes and their levels of evidence-based clinical knowledge about appropriate sealant use according to the American Dental Association (ADA) recommendations. The authors also assessed whether the number of years since graduation and reliance on peers or colleagues for regular clinical information were associated with dentists' knowledge.

METHODS

The authors administered a 25-item pretested questionnaire to a convenience sample of general and pediatric dentists (n = 163) at the 2013 Florida National Dental Convention in Kissimmee, Fla. The authors conducted multivariate linear regression modeling to predict dentists' levels of evidence-based clinical knowledge.

RESULTS

Years since graduation (P = .2) and reliance on peers or colleagues for regular clinical information (P = .6) did not predict higher knowledge. Male dentists (P = .003) and those who accepted children enrolled in Medicaid as new patients (P = .01) had significantly more knowledge compared with their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Most participating dentists used sealants in their practices and had high levels of positive attitudes about using sealants. Overall knowledge regarding the appropriate use of sealants, however, was low.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

For practicing dental professionals, the authors recommend disseminating evidence-based recommendations for the use of dental sealants via continuing education courses and other possible modalities. They also recommend that dental schools update their existing courses or modules about sealants by integrating the ADA's recommendations.

Evaluation of a dental benefit plan for children conducted in Auvergne, France, since 1992

Usually, the French dental insurance system covers the cost of restorative treatment but does not reimburse the cost of preventive therapies. A French sick-fund covering self-employed persons tested a new dental benefit plan for children intended to provide an incentive to develop office-based preventive activities. The programme, which started in 1992, concerns all 4-year-old children of self-employed workers in a single French region (Auvergne). Participants undergo an annual examination by the dentist of their choice until their 15th birthday. If the child is seen every year, all services related to dental caries (preventive and restorative) are provided free of charge. An ongoing evaluation of the programme was necessary to determine its influence on the development of office-based preventive activities and the dental health of the participants. A cohort of children enrolled in the programme in 1992 was followed over 4 years to examine the patterns of service use. In addition, a cross-sectional study comparing the caries experience of all 8-year-old children participating continuously in the programme (test sample) with that of a sample of control children (n=90) was conducted in 1996. Data from the longitudinal follow-up indicate that 43.37% of the 551 children to whom the programme was offered in 1992 underwent an annual examination in the first year. Of the children enrolled in 1992, 55.2% were still participating in the programme in 1996. Results showed that independent practitioners continued to focus on restorative treatment rather than preventive therapy. Results from the cross-sectional study are in accordance with this trend. The number of caries-free children was identical in test and control samples and the mean dft, DMFT, DT and dt did not vary between the two groups (Student's t-test, P>0.05). However the mean number of filled teeth was significantly higher in the test children than in the controls (P<0.01). For children with caries, the mean dft was 23.5% greater in the test group than in the control group (P<0.05). In Auvergne, a large number of families were not ready to participate in a plan that required them to take their child to the dentist every year. There was not a perceived need for regular preventive dental care, an attitude probably reinforced by the interventionist approach undertaken by the dentists over the survey period. Moreover, the plan did not provide an incentive for dentists to develop office-based preventive activities.

The relationship between the number of sound, decayed, and filled permanent tooth surfaces and the number of sealed surfaces in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the prevalence of sound, decayed, filled, and sealed permanent tooth surfaces for children and adolescents from three fluoridated communities in British Columbia and to develop a predictive model of sealant use that included the dental caries status of tooth surfaces.

METHODS

Children in grades 2 and 3 (n = 2,715) and adolescents in grades 8 and 9 (3,317) were surveyed to determine the prevalence of sound, decayed, filled, and sealed permanent tooth surfaces. The DMFS index, modified to include incipient (D1) and cavitated (D2) lesions, was used to measure the status of all tooth surfaces. The prevalence of D1D2MF and sealed tooth surfaces was estimated by age group and tooth type. Logistic regression models were developed to analyze the association between a number of independent variables and sealant use.

RESULTS

About 60 percent of surveyed students had one or more sealants present, with a mean of 3.2 sealants per subject. Of all pit and fissure surfaces on permanent first molars, 23.4 percent and 20.1 percent were sealed for the 11 years and younger and 12 years and older age groups, respectively. For these same two age groups, the percentages of pit and fissure surfaces that were decayed and filled were 6.7 percent and 19.7 percent, respectively. For both age groups combined, 10.8 percent and 23.7 percent of all pit and fissure surfaces on second molars and premolars, respectively, were sealed. The prevalence of decayed and filled pit and fissure surfaces was 5.6 percent and 1.8 percent, respectively, for second molars and premolars. Premolars were being sealed at a rate of 13 to 1 compared to the number of decayed and filled surfaces. Logistic regression failed to identify meaningful predictors of sealant use.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study found an increase in the prevalence of sealants in the three communities surveyed, yet failed to identify criteria used by dentists or auxiliaries when making decisions about sealant placement. Professional education in the appropriate use of sealants may be necessary.

The use of dental sealants by Ohio dentists

OBJECTIVES

To assess the extent to which Ohio dentists report using pit and fissure sealants and factors associated with sealant use.

METHODS

A mail survey of a random sample of Ohio dentists was conducted in 1989 and repeated in 1992 with a newly drawn sample. Only responses from general dentists were analyzed using univariate analyses and multiple regression.

RESULTS

Dentists who reported using sealants increased from 79.4 percent in 1989 to 91.8 percent in 1992. In 1992, 42.9 percent were low-level users (< 15% of school-aged patients), 41.7 percent were moderate-level users (15-39%), and 15.3 percent were high-level users (> 39%). Over three-fourths of sealant-using dentists expressed some degree of willingness to seal incipient caries. The level of sealant use was associated with dentists' knowledge about sealants, conservative management of dental caries, number of children seen in the practice, and influence of insurance coverage for sealants. The regression model explained 22.0 percent of the variance. Clinical factors associated with the level of use were: dentists' willingness to seal premolars; caries-free teeth; teeth with deep, narrow pits and fissures; teeth with small, frank occlusal caries; and patients 18 years of age or older. This regression model explained only 15.1 percent of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The grate majority of Ohio dentists report using sealants. The percent of reported sealant users increased between 1989 and 1992. Ohio dentists are not consistent with regard to the percent of their child patients for whom they apply sealants or their willingness to seal incipient caries. Dentists continue to identify lack of insurance coverage for sealant application as a major barrier to patients receiving the service.

Pit and fissure sealants: another major cornerstone in preventive dentistry

Despite dramatic reductions in caries in fluoridated communities, the disease continues to occur during childhood and adolescence and there is a sustained caries susceptibility of pits and fissures. Pit and fissure sealants have been available to the dental profession for the past two decades. Closely following community water fluoridation, this use of adhesive technology is now recognized as a major cornerstone of modern preventive dentistry. However, the technique appears to have been slow in implementation by the dental profession. Recent expanded utilization of sealants in the public sector, particularly in Victoria, has increased the awareness of the procedure amongst the public and is heightening demand. A review of the pertinent literature and current trends in utilization of sealants is presented. The case is made for expanded utilization of sealants in both the public and private sectors of dental health care delivery in Australia.

Factors associated with fissure sealant delegation: dentist characteristics and office staffing patterns

The purpose of this research was to identify dentist characteristics and dental office staffing patterns related to delegation of sealant applications. Results from a 1989 mailed survey were used to characterize Michigan general dentists (N = 300) who did or did not delegate sealant applications to auxiliaries and to identify factors associated with delegation. Nearly 50 percent of respondents were applying all sealants themselves. In offices that delegated the procedure, the mean proportion of sealants being applied by dentists was 39.9 percent. Registered dental hygienists were applying 51 percent, while registered dental assistants were applying 6.5 percent. Delegating dentists were more knowledgeable about sealant procedures, held more favorable attitudes, treated more young patients, placed more sealants, and were better informed about the legality of delegation according to the state practice act. Logistic regression analysis found that employing a registered dental hygienist was the most significant factor associated with sealant delegation, followed by employing a registered dental assistant. Findings suggest that dental auxiliaries, and particularly registered dental assistants, are underutilized for applying sealants. Approaches to increasing delegation of sealants may include changing dentists' traditional hiring patterns, highlighting the skills of auxiliaries such as the registered dental hygienist (RDH) and the registered dental assistant (RDA), and increasing awareness of legally allowable procedures that RDHs and RDAs can perform.