Racial differences in survival of oral and pharyngeal cancer patients in North Carolina

The Health System and Policy Implications of Changing Epidemiology for Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Cancers in the United States From 1995 to 2016

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are typically grouped under the general term, "oral cancer." Yet, the incidence of oropharyngeal cancers is increasing in the United States, while the incidence of oral cavity cancers has declined. These 2 distinct but conflated groups of oral cancers are attributed to different risk factors. Incidence and survival trends were examined across US population groups and by anatomical subsite. Disparities in incidence and survival by sex, race/ethnicity, and subsite were identified. Risk factors are complex, interactive, and not fully identified. Cancer control research illustrates health disparities in access to care and patient outcomes. Database and supplemental searches yielded 433 articles published between 1995 and 2016 characterizing aspects of oral cancer epidemiology relating to incidence, survival, risk, disparities, and cancer control. Oral cavity cancer survival in black men remains the most intractable burden. Although understanding of oral cancer etiology is improving, application to policy is limited. Cancer control efforts are diverse, sporadic, limited in scope, and generally lacking in success, and they need stratification by oral cavity cancers/oropharyngeal cancers. Further intervention and epidemiologic research, improved workforce capacity, and integrated care delivery are identified as important directions for public health policy. Sustained, multilevel campaigns modeled on tobacco control success are suggested.

Association of alpha B-crystallin genotypes with oral cancer susceptibility, survival, and recurrence in Taiwan

Background

Alpha B-crystallin (CRYAB) is a protein that functions as “molecular chaperone” in preserving intracellular architecture and cell membrane. Also, CRYAB is highly antiapoptotic. Abnormal CRYAB expression is a prognostic biomarker for oral cancer, while its genomic variations and the association with carcinogenesis have never been studied.

Methodology/Finding

Therefore, we hypothesized that CRYAB single nucleotide polymorphisms may be associated with oral cancer risk. In this hospital-based study, the association of CRYAB A-1215G (rs2228387), C-802G (rs14133) and intron2 (rs2070894) polymorphisms with oral cancer in a Taiwan population was investigated. In total, 496 oral cancer patients and 992 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were genotyped and analyzed. A significantly different frequency distribution was found in CRYAB C-802G genotypes, but not in A-1215G and intron2 genotypes, between the oral cancer and control groups. The CRYAB C-802G G allele conferred an increased risk of oral cancer (P = 1.49×10⁻⁵). Patients carrying CG/GG at CRYAB C-802G were of lower 5-year survival and higher recurrence rate than those of CC (P<0.05).

Conclusion/Significance

Our results provide the first evidence that the G allele of CRYAB C-802G is correlated with oral cancer risk and this polymorphism may be a useful marker for oral cancer recurrence and survival prediction for clinical reference.

Matched-pair analysis of race or ethnicity in outcomes of head and neck cancer patients receiving similar multidisciplinary care

It is unknown whether population-level racial or ethnic disparities in mortality from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) also occur in the setting of standardized multidisciplinary-team directed care. Therefore, we conducted a matched-pair study that controlled for several potentially confounding prognostic variables to assess whether a difference in survival exists for African American or Hispanic American compared with non-Hispanic white American SCCHN patients receiving similar care. Matched pairs were 81 African American case and 81 non-Hispanic white control patients and 100 Hispanic American cases and 100 matched non-Hispanic white controls selected from 1,833 patients of a prospective epidemiologic study of incident SCCHN within a single, large multidisciplinary cancer center. Matching variables included age (+/-10 years), sex, smoking status (never versus ever), site, tumor stage (T(1-2) versus T(3-4)), nodal status (negative versus positive), and treatment. Cases and controls were not significantly different in proportions of comorbidity score, alcohol use, subsite distribution, overall stage, or tumor grade. Matched-pair and log-rank analyses showed no significant differences between cases and controls in recurrence-free, disease-specific, or overall survival. Site-specific analyses suggested that more aggressive oropharyngeal cancers occurred more frequently in minority than in non-Hispanic white patients. We conclude that minority and non-Hispanic white SCCHN patients receiving similar multidisciplinary-team directed care at a tertiary cancer center have similar survival results overall. These results encourage reducing health disparities in SCCHN through public-health efforts to improve access to multidisciplinary oncologic care (and to preventive measures) and through individual clinician efforts to make the best multidisciplinary cancer treatment choices available for their minority patients. The subgroup finding suggests a biologically based racial/ethnic disparity among oropharyngeal patients and that prevention and treatment strategies should be tailored to different populations of these patients.

Interaction of Exo1 genotypes and smoking habit in oral cancer in Taiwan

Exonuclease 1 (Exo1) is an important nuclease involved in the mismatch repair system that helps to maintain genomic stability, to modulate DNA recombination, and to mediate cell cycle arrest. Potential polymorphisms in Exo1 may alter cancer risks by influencing the repair activity of Exo1. Therefore, we hypothesized that single-nucleotide polymorphisms in Exo1 were associated with the risk of oral cancer. In this hospital-based study, the associations of Exo1 A-1419G (rs3754093), C-908G (rs10802996), A238G (rs1776177), C498T (rs1635517), K589E (rs1047840), G670E (rs1776148), C723R (rs1635498), L757P (rs9350) and C3114T (rs851797) polymorphisms with oral cancer risk in a central Taiwan population were investigated. In total, 680 patients with oral cancer and 680 age- and gender-matched healthy controls recruited from the China Medical University Hospital were genotyped. A significantly different distribution is found in the frequency of the Exo1 K589E genotype, but not the other genotypes, between the oral cancer and control groups. The A allele Exo1 K589E conferred a significant (P=6.18E-8) increased risk of oral cancer. Gene-environment interactions with smoking were significant for Exo1 K589E polymorphism (OR=2.509, 95% CI=1.914-3.287). Our results provide evidence that the A allele of the Exo1 K589E may be associated with the development of oral cancer.

Association between DNA double strand break gene Ku80 polymorphisms and oral cancer susceptibility

The DNA double strand break repair gene Ku80 is thought to play a major role in the caretaking of the overall genome stability. It is very possible that defective in double strand break repair capacity can lead to human carcinogenesis. Thus, the polymorphic variants of Ku80 were firstly investigated regarding their association with oral cancer susceptibility. In this hospital-based case-control study, the association of Ku80 promoter G-1401T (rs828907), promoter C-319T (rs11685387), and intron19 (rs9288518) polymorphisms with oral cancer risk in a Taiwanese population was investigated. 600 patients with oral cancer and 600 age- and gender-matched healthy controls recruited were genotyped and analyzed by PCR-RFLP method. There were significant differences between oral cancer and control groups in the distributions of their genotypes (P=0.0038) and allelic frequencies (P=0.0044) in the Ku80 promoter G-1401T polymorphism. In the other two polymorphisms, there was no difference between both groups in the distribution of either genotype or allelic frequency. There is a synergistic gene-environmental interaction between Ku80 and areca chewing. Compared with G/G genotype in Ku80 promoter G-1401T, the G/T plus T/T significantly enhanced the risk only in the areca chewers (odds ratio=1.603; 95% confidence interval=1.053-2.011), not in the non-areca chewers. In conclusion, the Ku80 promoter G-1401T is correlated with oral cancer susceptibility and this polymorphism may be a useful marker for oral cancer prevention and early detection.

Oral cancer and genetic polymorphism of DNA double strand break gene Ku70 in Taiwan

The DNA repair gene Ku70, an important caretaker of the overall genome stability, is thought to play a major role in the DNA double strand break repair system. It is known that defects in double strand break repair capacity can lead to irreversible genomic instability. However, the polymorphic variants of Ku70 and their association with oral cancer susceptibility has never been reported on. In this hospital-based case-control study, the association of Ku70 promoter T-991C (rs5751129), promoter G-57C (rs2267437), promoter A-31G (rs132770), and intron3 (rs132774) polymorphisms with oral cancer risk in a Taiwanese population was investigated. In total, 318 patients with oral cancer and 318 age- and gender-matched healthy controls recruited from the China Medical Hospital in Taiwan were genotyped. The results showed that there were significant differences between the oral cancer and control groups in the distribution of their genotypes (P=0.0031) and allelic frequency (P=0.0009) in the Ku70 promoter T-991C polymorphism. Individuals who carried at least one C allele (T/C or C/C) had a 2.15-fold increased risk of developing oral cancer compared to those who carried the T/T wild-type genotype (95% CI: 1.37-3.36). In the other three polymorphisms, there was no difference between both groups in the distribution of either genotype or allelic frequency. In conclusion, the Ku70 promoter T-991C, but not the Ku70 promoter C-57G, promoter A-31G or intron3, is connected to oral cancer susceptibility. This polymorphism may be a novel useful marker for primary prevention and anticancer intervention.

A novel single nucleotide polymorphism in XRCC4 gene is associated with oral cancer susceptibility in Taiwanese patients

The DNA double strand break repair gene XRCC4, an important caretaker of genome stability, is suggested to play a role in the development of human carcinogenesis. However, no evidence has been provided showing that XRCC4 was associated with oral oncology. In this hospital-based case-control study, the association of XRCC4 G-1394T (rs6869366), intron 3 (rs28360071), intron 7 (rs28360317), and intron 7 (rs1805377) polymorphisms with oral cancer risk in a Taiwanese population was first investigated. In total, 318 patients with oral cancer and 318 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were genotyped. We found a significant different distribution in the frequency of the XRCC4 intron 3 genotype, but not the XRCC4 G-1394T or intron 7 genotypes, between the oral cancer and control groups. Those who had heterozygous del/ins at XRCC4 intron 3 showed a 1.57-fold (95% confidence interval=1.12-2.21) increased risk of oral cancer compared to those with ins/ins. As for XRCC4 G-1394T or intron 7 polymorphisms, there was no difference in the distribution between the oral cancer and control groups. There were significant gene-environment interactions between XRCC4 intron 3 genotype with smoking and with betel quid chewing, but not with alcoholism. In smoker and betel quid chewer groups, the XRCC4 intron 3 del variants exhibited 2.57- and 3.03-fold higher risks than the ins genotype, respectively. Our results firstly suggest that the XRCC4 intron 3 del genotype may be associated with oral oncology and may be a novel useful marker for primary prevention and anticancer intervention.

Oral cancer

Five percent of all tumors occur in the head and neck, and approximately half of those occur specifically in the oral cavity. Of the 615,000 new cases of head and neck [corrected] tumors reported worldwide in 2000, 300,000 were primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas. Recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program suggest that 28,900 new cases of oral cancer will be identified and 7400 deaths attributed to oral cancer each year in the United States. The sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality, oral cancer accounts for 1 death every hour in the United States. However, despite advances in screening tools, imaging technology, and access to primary care physicians, a considerable percentage of patients present with advanced-stage disease. Clinical signs and symptoms of head and neck tumors are often nonspecific and may be mistaken for other common ailments. Primary care physicians must be aware of the possibility of oral cancer, particularly the increasing incidence in young patients without traditional risk factors of alcohol and tobacco abuse. To improve survival, all patients should be routinely and vigilantly screened for oral mucosal lesions.

Prognostic factors associated with the survival of oral and pharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan

Background

In Taiwan, a distinct ethnic group variation in incidence and mortality rates has been suggested for most carcinomas. Our aim is to identify the role of prognostic factors associated with the survival of oral and pharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan.

Methods

Taiwan Cancer Registry records of 9039 subjects diagnosed with oral and pharyngeal carcinoma were analyzed. The population was divided into three ethnic groups by residence, which were Taiwanese aborigines, Hakka and Hokkien communities. Five-year survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Ethnic curves differed significantly by log-rank test; therefore separate models for Taiwanese aborigines, Hakka and Hokkien were carried out. The Cox multivariate proportional hazards model was used to examine the role of prognostic factors on ethnic survival.

Results

The five-year survival rates of oral and pharyngeal carcinoma were significantly poorer for Hokkien community (53.9%) and Taiwanese aborigines community (58.1%) compared with Hakka community (60.5%). The adjusted hazard ratio of Taiwanese aborigines versus Hakka was 1.07 (95%CI, 0.86–1.33) for oral and pharyngeal carcinoma mortality, and 1.16 (95%CI, 1.01–1.33) for Hokkien versus Hakka. Males had significantly poor prognosis than females. Subjects with tongue and/or mouth carcinoma presented the worst prognosis, whereas lip carcinoma had the best prognosis. Subjects with verrucous carcinoma had better survival than squamous cell carcinoma. Prognosis was the worst in elderly subjects, and subjects who underwent surgery had the highest survival rate.

Conclusion

Our study presented that predictive variables in oral and pharyngeal carcinoma survival have been: ethnic groups, period of diagnosis, gender, diagnostic age, anatomic site, morphologic type, and therapy.

Advanced stage of head and neck cancer at a tertiary-care county hospital

BACKGROUND

Public hospitals provide health care for uninsured and medically underserved patients in large metropolitan areas. Outcomes for head and neck cancer patients within this population are perceived as being worse than outcomes for the general population, perhaps because of advanced stage at presentation.

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses the initial cancer stage in patients with head and neck carcinoma presenting to an urban tertiary-care county hospital compared with data for the general population.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of 209 consecutive patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer by the Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery from October 2003 to April 2005.

METHODS

Clinical and pathologic data were obtained as patients presented and underwent treatment. Demographic data were obtained retrospectively. Staging analysis was performed on 186 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Normative data were obtained from the National Cancer Database.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55, with a 4:1 male to female ratio. Over 95% of patients reported being unemployed. The racial composition was white 27%, African American 52%, Hispanic 11%, Asian 7%, and 3% "other." Staging revealed that 68% of patients were stage IV, and 85% would be considered "advanced" disease (stage III/IV). This is significantly worse than what national data demonstrates, where only 39% are stage IV, and 55% have advanced stage of disease at presentation.

CONCLUSION

Although the perceived poor outcome of uninsured and underserved cancer patients is multifactorial, advanced stage at presentation is a critical factor. These statistics demonstrate the need for increased patient education and screening for this underserved population as an initial step to improve outcome.

Florida adults' oral cancer knowledge and examination experiences

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed awareness of oral cancer, knowledge of its major risk factors and clinical signs, and oral cancer examination experiences among Florida adults aged 40 years and older.

METHODS

A statewide random digit dial, computer assisted telephone survey was conducted in 2002. Data from 1,773 respondents were weighted to permit statewide estimates. Bivariate analyses were used to examine awareness and knowledge of oral cancer. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to model past-year oral cancer examination experiences of Florida's adults.

RESULTS

In Florida, 15.5% of adults aged 40 years and older had never heard of oral cancer and another 40.3% reportedly knew little or nothing about it. About one-half of adults did not think oral white or red patches or bleeding could indicate oral cancer and 27.6% correctly identified three of oral cancer's major risk factors. After hearing an oral cancer exam described, just 19.5% of adults reported receiving one within the preceding 12 months. Blacks and Hispanics were significantly less likely than non-Hispanic whites to have received a recent oral cancer examination. Persons with low levels of education, those who lacked a regular dentist or source of preventive medical care, and adults who knew few or none of the clinical signs of oral cancer also were less likely to have received a recent oral cancer exam.

CONCLUSIONS

There is widespread lack of awareness and knowledge in Florida regarding oral cancer and low levels of reported examination, particularly among groups experiencing disproportionately high incidence and late stage diagnosis. Increasing awareness of this disease and promoting primary and secondary prevention may help lessen the disease burden in Florida and reduce racial disparities in its outcomes.

Underserved elderly issues in the United States: burdens of oral and medical health care

The elderly represent approximately 12.4% of the general population (2000 Census), yet their health care expenditure and consumption represent 14% of the total (2003). Although 10% of the elderly had no medical insurance in 2000, 78% had no dental insurance. Elderly Americans' burden of medical care overuse is worsened by their out-of-pocket expenses for oral health, because this is usually not a covered benefit. In underserved communities, the management of the oral health and dental care needs of older Americans approaches negligence.

Oral cancer knowledge and examination experiences among North Carolina adults

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses knowledge of oral cancer risk factors, clinical signs, and oral cancer examination experience among North Carolina adults.

METHODS

A statewide random digit dial, computer-assisted telephone interview was conducted in 2002. Data from 1,096 respondents, with a response rate of 62 percent, were poststratified to 2000 census data by sex, race, and age group to produce population-based estimates. Knowledge of one sign of oral cancer, four or more risk factors for oral cancer, and having ever had an oral cancer examination were compared in logistic regression models using normalized weights.

RESULTS

Fourteen (95% confidence interval [CI] +/-2) percent of adults had never heard of oral or mouth cancer. Risk factor knowledge was high for 56 percent (95% CI+/-3) and associated in a logistic regression model with younger age, feeling personal factors cause cancer, and nonuse of snuff. One sign of oral cancer (sore/lesion, red or white patch in mouth, and bleeding in the mouth) was correctly identified by 53 percent (95% CI+/-3) with significantly more correct responses from younger people, nonsmokers, and some college education. Only 29 percent (95% CI+/-3) reported ever having had an oral cancer examination when this procedure was described. Most respondents reported exams performed by dentists. In a weighted logistic regression model, older age, being dentate, nonsmokers, alcohol users, and those with some college education were significantly more likely to report having ever had an oral cancer examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is moderate knowledge of signs and risk factors for oral cancer among North Carolina adults, knowledge deficits remain. Oral cancer examinations need to be increased, particularly among tobacco smokers.

Microsatellite alterations in african americans with head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the genetic differences between African Americans (AA) and Non-African Americans (NAA) with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

DNA was obtained from tumor tissues and peripheral blood from 18 AA and 19 NAA patients with HNSCC. Microsatellite analysis using a fluorescent technique was performed on chromosomal arms 1p, 3p, 4q, 9p, 13q, and 17p. Statistical analyses were performed on the molecular and clinical outcome data.

RESULTS

Based on the Surveillance, Epidemiologic, and End Result (SEER) data from southeast Michigan, the incidence rate of HNSCC in AA has been higher than for NAA, and the overall 5-year relative survival rate is lower for AA than NAA (36.2% vs. 47.6%). In this study, we found that the rate of loss of heterozygosity of chromosomal arms 1p, 3p, 4q, 9p, 13q, and 17p ranged from 68.8% to 83.3% for HNSCC in AA and from 66.7% to 90.0% in NAA. The difference in the rates of microsatellite alterations in chromosomal arms 3p, 4q, and 9p between AA and NAA were between 12.5% and 20% and were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The incidence and clinical outcomes for AA with HNSCC are different from that of NAA in southeast Michigan. In our group of patients with HNSCC, differences in rates of microsatellite alterations and survival were found between AA and NAA; however, these differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that genetic difference, as determined by the rates of microsatellite alterations, is not predictive of outcome difference between AA and NAA HNSCC patients.

Important prognostic factors of long-term oropharyngeal carcinoma survivors in Taiwan

In Taiwan, a clear gender difference emerges for rates of oropharyngeal carcinoma incidence. The purpose of this study was to identify the gender differences and clinical factors associated with oropharyngeal carcinoma survival rates in Taiwan. We analyzed the 5-year survival rates of 8114 subjects diagnosed with oropharyngeal carcinoma between 1987 and 1994. The Cox proportional-hazards model identified clinical characteristics for gender according to oropharyngeal carcinoma death and all-cause death outcomes. The 5-year survival rates were significantly lower for males than females (p < 0.0001). The adjusted hazard ratio of males versus females was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.36-1.74) for oropharyngeal carcinoma death and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.31-1.58) for all-cause death. Gender and other clinical characteristics (i.e. diagnostic age, anatomic site, morphologic type, and treatment modality) play important roles in oropharyngeal carcinoma survival. We suggested that Taiwanese males have high proportion of betel quid chewing and that this is associated with the gender differences.

Impact of race on outcome after definitive radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the impact of race (black vs. white) on the outcome of patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Between 1983 and 1997, 686 patients completed definitive, twice-daily radiotherapy (RT) alone or combined with a planned neck dissection; no patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The minimum follow-up was 2 years, and median follow-up was 7 years for living patients. No patients were lost to follow-up. Fifty-five patients were black (8%).

RESULTS

Although the two groups had similar 5-year local-regional control rates (black patients vs. white patients: 70% vs. 76%, respectively; P = 0.275), black patients had double the risk for distant recurrence compared with white patients (27% vs. 13%; P = 0.012). The 5-year cause-specific and absolute survival rates were lower for black patients (52% vs. 74% [P = 0.001] and 29% vs. 52% [P < 0.001], respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that race was an independent predictor of freedom from distant metastasis (P = 0.013), cause-specific survival (P = 0.005), and absolute survival (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although equal local-regional control rates can be achieved in black patients and white patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, the risk of distant recurrence was significantly higher in black patients and resulted in decreased survival. Reevaluation of current strategies for pretreatment metastatic work-ups and development of more effective systemic therapy will be key to improving the survival disparity in this group.

Presentation, treatment, and outcome of oral cavity cancer: a National Cancer Data Base report

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer has been identified as a significant public health threat. Systematic evaluation of the impact of this disease on the US population is of great importance to health care providers and policy makers.

METHODS

This study used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to evaluate associations between demographic and disease characteristics, treatment, and survival for patients with oral cavity cancer in the United States. Of patients diagnosed between 1985 and 1996, 58,976 were extracted from the NCDB. ANOVAs were performed on selected cross-tabulations, and relative survival was used to calculate outcome.

RESULTS

Median age of patients was 64.0 years. Men made up 60.2% of patients. Pathologic diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 86.3% of cases. Younger patients had a much higher frequency of non-SCC, and this was related to survival in these patients. African-Americans (independent of income), lower income patients, and patients with higher grade disease were seen more frequently with advanced-stage SCC. Five-year relative survival for SCC cases was lower for older patients, men, and African-Americans.

CONCLUSIONS

This study addressed many issues related to oral cancer that have been previously discussed in the literature. The demographic, site, stage, histologic, and survival data available for this large number of cases in the NCDB allowed an accurate characterization of the contemporary status of oral cancer in the United States.

Racial disparity in survival of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and pharynx

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine if race and age are independent prognostic factors for survival in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and pharynx.

METHODS

Retrospective study.

RESULTS

Out of 909 patients registered, 815 (90%) were white and 94 (10%) were African-American. The median age was 60 years (range 19-93). The African-American patients had a significantly lower 5 year survival rate of 27.6% (95% CI 19.9-38.3) compared with white patients with a survival rate of 52.0% (95% CI 48.7-55.6) (P < 0.001). The greatest racial disparities in survival were observed in patients under 60 years of age [29.2% (95% CI 19.5-43.6) vs 60.9% (95% CI 56.3-66.0) for African-American and white patients, respectively, P < 0.001], and in African-American men compared with white men [20.2% (95% CI 12.6-30.2) vs 51.0% (95% CI 46.7-53.0), P < 0.001]. A multivariate Cox model, stratified according to stage of disease, indicated that race, age, and type of treatment were statistically significant predictors of survival. After adjusting for race and treatment received, African-American patients had a relative risk of dying of 1.61 (95% CI 1.23-2.10) compared with white patients. All patients 60 years of age and older had a higher risk of dying 1.59 (95% CI 1.31-1.92). Compared with surgical treatment alone, radiotherapy and other treatments were both associated with increased risk of dying with respective relative risks of 1.34 (95% CI 1.01-1.76) and 1.94 (95% CI 1.52-1.48).

CONCLUSIONS

African-American patients had poorer survival outcomes, with race and age emerging as significant independent predictors of survival after treatment for oral and pharyngeal cancer, compared with their white counterparts. Primary and secondary prevention programs that target younger patients at high risk might reduce environmental risk factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption, which may play a greater role in the acquired susceptibility for oral and pharyngeal cancer in African-American males.