1
|
Pergolizzi JV, LeQuang JA, El-Tallawy SN, Wagner M, Ahmed RS, Varrassi G. An update on pharmacotherapy for trigeminal neuralgia. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:773-786. [PMID: 38870050 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2365946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trigeminal neuralgia is a rare condition that can be effectively treated by carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine but these older drugs are associated with dose-dependent and potentially treatment-limiting adverse effects. Third-generation anticonvulsants, new calcitonin gene-related peptide blockers for migraine, and older drugs such as ketamine and cannabinoids may be promising adjuvants or monotherapeutic options. AREAS COVERED The new drugs, their presumed mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy are discussed herein. There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence in support of these drugs for trigeminal neuralgia. New migraine agents are considered as well although migraines and trigeminal neuralgia are distinct, albeit similar, conditions. No new drugs have been released to market in recent years with the specific indication of trigeminal neuralgia. EXPERT OPINION In real-world clinical practice, about half of trigeminal neuralgia patients take more than one agent for prevention and combination therapy may be the optimal approach. Combination therapy might allow for lower doses of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine, thus reducing the number and severity of potential adverse events but the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions must be considered. Drug therapy for trigeminal neuralgia involves acute or abortive treatments, often administered in hospital versus long-term preventive therapy, usually involving oral agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Salah N El-Tallawy
- Anesthesia and Pain Department, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Anesthesia Department, Medicine, Minia University & NCI, Minia, Egypt
| | | | - Rania S Ahmed
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling inhibitors have shown efficacy in both the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Telcagepant, a first-generation CGRP receptor antagonist, was effective but failed in clinical trials due to hepatotoxicity. Subsequently, although 4 next-generation CGRP receptor antagonists (rimegepant, zavegepant, atogepant, and ubrogepant) were being advanced into late-stage clinical trials, due to telcagepant’s failure, more confidence in the liver safety of these compounds was needed. DILIsym v6A, a quantitative systems toxicology (QST) model of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), was used to model all 5 compounds and thus to compare the 4 next-generation CGRP receptor antagonists to telcagepant. In vitro experiments were performed to measure the potential for each compound to inhibit bile acid transporters, produce oxidative stress, and cause mitochondrial dysfunction. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were produced for each compound in order to appropriately estimate liver exposure. DILIsym predicted clinical elevations of liver enzymes and bilirubin for telcagepant, correctly predicting the observed DILI liability of the first-generation compound. By contrast, DILIsym predicted that each of the 4 next-generation compounds would be significantly less likely to cause DILI than telcagepant. Subsequent clinical trials have validated these predictions for each of the 4 compounds, and all 3 of the compounds submitted to FDA to date (rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant) have since been approved by the FDA with no warning for hepatotoxicity. This work demonstrates the potential for QST modeling to prospectively differentiate between hepatotoxic and nonhepatotoxic molecules within the same class.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey L Woodhead
- To whom correspondence should be addressed at DILIsym Services, Inc., A Simulations Plus Company, 6 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. E-mail:
| | - Scott Q Siler
- DILIsym Services, Inc., A Simulations Plus Company, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27706, USA
| | - Brett A Howell
- DILIsym Services, Inc., A Simulations Plus Company, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27706, USA
| | - Paul B Watkins
- Institute for Drug Safety Sciences, UNC-Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Charles Conway
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garelja ML, Walker CS, Hay DL. CGRP receptor antagonists for migraine. Are they also AMY 1 receptor antagonists? Br J Pharmacol 2021; 179:454-459. [PMID: 34076887 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of several drugs that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system has been a major breakthrough in the pharmacological management of migraine. These are divided into two major classes, antibodies which bind to the CGRP peptide, preventing it from activating CGRP receptors and receptor antagonists. Within the receptor antagonist class, there are two mechanisms of action, small molecule receptor antagonists and an antibody antagonist. This mini-review considers the pharmacology of these receptor targeted antagonist drugs at the CGRP receptor and closely related AMY1 receptor, at which CGRP may also act. The antagonists are most potent at the CGRP receptor but can also show antagonism of the AMY1 receptor. However, important data are missing and selectivity parameters cannot be provided for all antagonists. The clinical implications of AMY1 receptor antagonism are unknown, but we urge consideration of this receptor as a potential contributing factor to CGRP and antagonist drug actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Garelja
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Christopher S Walker
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Debbie L Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dubowchik GM, Conway CM, Xin AW. Blocking the CGRP Pathway for Acute and Preventive Treatment of Migraine: The Evolution of Success. J Med Chem 2020; 63:6600-6623. [PMID: 32058712 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The pivotal role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine pathophysiology was identified over 30 years ago, but the successful clinical development of targeted therapies has only recently been realized. This Perspective traces the decades long evolution of medicinal chemistry required to advance small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists, also called gepants, including the current clinical agents rimegepant, vazegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant. Providing clinically effective blockade of CGRP signaling required surmounting multiple challenging hurdles, including defeating a sizable ligand with subnanomolar affinity for its receptor, designing antagonists with an extended confirmation and multiple pharmacophores while retaining solubility and oral bioavailability, and achieving circulating free plasma levels that provided near maximal CGRP receptor coverage. The clinical efficacy of oral and intranasal gepants and the injectable CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are described, as are recent synthetic developments that have benefited from new structural biology data. The first oral gepant was recently approved and heralds a new era in the treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gene M Dubowchik
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., 215 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
| | - Charles M Conway
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., 215 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
| | - Alison W Xin
- Biohaven Pharmaceuticals Inc., 215 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yao G, Yu T, Han X, Mao X, Li B. Therapeutic effects and safety of olcegepant and telcagepant for migraine: A meta-analysis. Neural Regen Res 2014; 8:938-47. [PMID: 25206386 PMCID: PMC4145922 DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2012] [Accepted: 01/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of olcegepant and telcagepant for the treatment of migraine. DATA RETRIEVAL: We identified studies using Medline (1966-01/2012-06), PubMed (1966-01/2012-06), Scopus (1980-01/2012-06), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1980-01/2012-06) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1980-01/2012-06). SELECTION CRITERIA: The included studies were double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled trials of olcegepant or telcagepant for the treatment of single acute migraine in patients with or without aura. Adverse reaction data were also included. Two independent investigators performed quality evaluation and data extraction using Jadad scoring. Meta-analyses were undertaken using RevMan 5.0.25 software. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain relief rate, pain-free rate, and incidence of adverse reactions were measured in patients 2 and 24 hours after injection of olcegepant and oral telcagepant. RESULTS: Six randomized, controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with placebo, the pain relief rate (odds ratio, OR = 5.21, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.91–14.2, P < 0.01) and pain-free rate (OR = 31.11, 95% CI: 3.80–254.98, P < 0.01) significantly increased 2 hours after 2.5 mg/d olcegepant treatment. Pain relief rate and pain-free rate 2 and 24 hours after treatment with telcagepant 150 mg/d and 300 mg/d were superior to placebo (P < 0.01). Moreover, the remission rate of unrelenting headache was higher after 24 hours of 300 mg/d telcagepant treatment compared with 150 mg/d (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62–0.97, P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions with olcegepant was not significantly greater than placebo (P = 0.28), but within 48 hours of administration of telcagepant 300 mg/d, the incidence of adverse reactions was higher than placebo (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.04–1.42, P < 0.01). Few studies have compared the therapeutic effects of olcegepant and telcagepant. CONCLUSION: The calcitonin-gene-related peptide receptor antagonists olcegepant and telcagepant have shown good therapeutic effects in the treatment of migraine. Moreover, the incidence of adverse reactions compares favorably with placebo, although liver transaminases may become elevated after long-term use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Yao
- Department of Neurology, Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China ; Department of Neurology, First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| | - Tingmin Yu
- Department of Neurology, Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ximei Han
- Department of Neurology, Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China ; Department of Neurology, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng 024000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
| | - Xijing Mao
- Department of Neurology, Second Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin Province, China
| | - Bo Li
- Research Room of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bell IM. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists: New Therapeutic Agents for Migraine. J Med Chem 2014; 57:7838-58. [DOI: 10.1021/jm500364u] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M. Bell
- Department of Discovery Chemistry,
Merck Research Laboratories, West
Point, Pennsylvania 19486, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
CGRP antagonists for the treatment of migraine: rationale and clinical data. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.4155/cli.11.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
Telcagepant (MK0974) is one of several calcitonin-gene-related peptide antagonists in development as a potential treatment for acute migraine attacks and is the first orally available drug in this class. Preclinical and clinical data are reviewed, which support the efficacy and tolerability of telcagepant for the treatment of migraine, particularly for patients unable to tolerate, or who have cardiovascular contraindications to, triptans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Anne MacGregor
- The City of London Migraine Clinic, 22 Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6DX Centre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary, University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London
| |
Collapse
|