Radiation with cisplatin or carboplatin for locally advanced cervix cancer: The experience of a tertiary cancer centre

Outcomes with definitive radiotherapy among patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with relative or absolute contraindications to cisplatin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin, followed by brachytherapy, but is less defined for cisplatin-intolerant patients. We synthesized evidence on treatment outcomes with definitive radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (ChT) in these patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search and included 20 relevant studies. We extracted data on response, survival, compliance, and toxicity, and performed meta-analyses of outcome rates and risk ratios. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Meta-regression was performed to examine the effects of other variables.

RESULTS

Due to lack of comparative data, most comparisons were indirect and derived from the proportional meta-analyses. Complete response (85%) and survival (62% 5yOS) rates are comparable to those published for LACC without contraindications to cisplatin. Survival rate is better with CRT than RT alone (5yOS, 73% vs 58%), and with nodal boost (NB) than without (5yOS, 71% vs 56%). Carboplatin CRT is associated with lower 5yOS (44%) but better ChT compliance (86%) when compared to other interventions. ChT compliance is better in renal failure than elderly cohorts (89% vs 67%). RT compliance is lower with CRT than RT alone (90% vs 96%), and higher with NB than none (96% vs 93%). NB is associated with lower RT compliance than no NB, when ChT is given. Meta-regression results affirm ChT and NB to be significant positive factors for survival, and NB, which is associated with greater use of advanced RT techniques, for RT compliance.

CONCLUSION

For those with relative contraindications, cisplatin CRT is effective and well-tolerated. For those with absolute contraindications, carboplatin is well-tolerated but with unclear effectiveness. Nodal boost is effective and well-tolerated, but is less tolerated when concurrent ChT is given.

The efficacy of concurrent weekly carboplatin with radiotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate whether carboplatin has a comparable efficacy with cisplatin as part of weekly concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer (Car-RT vs. Cis-RT).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted and both prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated the efficacy of Car-RT for cervical cancer were included. The primary endpoints were complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The estimated CR rate and survival of patients treated with Car-RT were pooled. Acute toxicity was also summarized.

RESULTS

Twelve studies consisting of 1698 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. A lower CR rate (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.82, I² = 0%) and a trend toward poorer 3-year PFS/DFS (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49-1.02, I² = 0%) and 3-year OS (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46-1.05, I² = 36%) were found in Car-RT compared with Cis-RT. For the Car-RT groups, the pooled overall CR rate was 81% (95% CI 0.74-0.89). The pooled 3-year PFS/DFS rate was 64% (95% CI 0.52-0.78). The pooled 3-year OS rate was 73% (95% CI 0.62-0.87). Acute toxic events ≥ grade 3 were infrequent in the Car-RT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Car-RT showed a poorer tumor response and a trend toward inferior survival compared with Cis-RT in the treatment of cervical cancer. However, this evidence was limited by the imbalance among studies. Due to the encouraging efficacy and low toxicity, carboplatin is a suitable concurrent agent for patients with contraindications to cisplatin.

Meeting report, “First Indian national conference on cervical cancer management - expert recommendations and identification of barriers to implementation”

Objective

In India, cervical cancer accounts for almost 14% of all female cancer cases. Although poverty continues to cast a wide net over the Indian subcontinent, the preceding three decades have borne witness to improvements in nutrition and sanitation for many citizens. However, due to an absence of a national immunization program to cover human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and lack of accessible cervical cancer screening, the disease is characterized by late detection, lack of access to affordable and quality health care, and high mortality rates. Treatment of cervical cancer is stage-specific and depends on the patient’s age, desire to preserve fertility, overall health, the clinician’s expertise, and accessibility to resources. There is a paucity of uniform treatment protocols for various stages of cervical cancer in India. Considering all these parameters, a need to optimize treatment paradigms for the Indian population emerged.

Methods/materials

Three expert panel meetings were held in different regions of India from 2016 to 2017. They were comprised of 15 experts from across the country, and included surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. The panel members reviewed the literature from both national and global sources, discussed their clinical experience and local practices and evaluated current therapeutic options and management gaps for women diagnosed with cervical cancer.

Results

This article summarizes the expert opinion from these meetings. It discusses the available resources and highlights the current therapeutic options available for different cervical cancer stages: early stage disease, locally advanced tumors, recurrent/persistent/metastatic cancer. An Indian consensus governing treatment options emerged, including guidelines for use of the only approved targeted therapy in this disease, the anti-angiogenesis drug, bevacizumab.

Conclusions

The panel concluded that given the availability of state-of-the-art imaging modalities, surgical devices, radiotherapeutics, and novel agents in several population-dense urban centers, a uniform, multi-disciplinary treatment approach across patient care centers is ideal but not realistic due to cost and a paucity of third party payors for most Indian citizens. Preventative strategies including visual inspection with acetic acid to screen for precursor lesions (i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) with immediate referral for cervical cryotherapy and possible large-scale roll-out of the HPV vaccine in the near future can be expected to reduce mortality rates significantly in this country.

Evaluating the use of external beam radiation alone in the management of cervix cancer

Aim

To determine the outcome of patients with locally advanced cervix cancer treated with curative intent using external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), without brachytherapy.

Materials and methods

A chart review was performed of all patients with cervix cancer who received EBRT alone at our centre from 2000 to 2010. Overall survival and local control were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

Results

In total, 22 patients were identified. The median age and follow-up were 56 years and 65 months, respectively. The stage included IB to IVB. Main histology was squamous cell carcinoma (82%). Median tumour size was 5·5 cm. Majority treated with 3D conformal techniques and nine patients (41%) were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT); 14 patients received doses of ≥65 Gy. Most patients (73%) received weekly concurrent cis-platinum. The major reason for not receiving brachytherapy was locally extensive tumour (59%). The 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 57 and 50%, respectively. Seven patients (32%) had a component of loco-regional failure, mainly within the cervix. There was a better outcome among the nine patients treated with IMRT to a median dose of 66 Gy with a loco-regional control of 78%.

Conclusions

Patients who cannot have brachytherapy may still achieve acceptable rates of loco-regional disease control if high radiation doses (>65 Gy) was delivered.

Efficacy and toxicity of different concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of different concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimens in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer (CC) by adopting a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library from the inception of these databases to September 2016, and all cohort studies (CSs) related to different CCRT regimens in the treatment of CC were included. A network analysis was adopted to compare the combination of direct and indirect evidence, to analyze the odds ratio (OR), and to draw a surface under the cumulative ranking curve of the efficacy and toxicity of different CCRT regimens for CC. Cluster analyses were used to group each category based on similar treatment regimens.

RESULTS

Nineteen CSs were enrolled in this network meta-analysis, including 12 CCRT regimens (radiotherapy [RT], CCRT [cisplatin], CCRT [vinorelbine], CCRT [paclitaxel], CCRT [hydroxyurea], CCRT [cisplatin + FU], CCRT [cisplatin + gemcitabine], CCRT [cisplatin + docetaxel], CCRT [cisplatin + paclitaxel], CCRT [cisplatin + amifostine], CCRT [cisplatin + FU + hydroxyurea], and CCRT [cisplatin + vincristine + bleomycin]). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that regarding efficacy, the overall response rate of CCRT (cisplatin + docetaxel) was higher than RT, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of CCRT (cisplatin + FU + hydroxyurea) was relatively higher than CCRT (hydroxyurea). As for toxicity, CCRT (cisplatin) had a lower incidence of leukopenia than CCRT (hydroxyurea), CCRT (cisplatin + FU) and CCRT (cisplatin + paclitaxel), and the incidences of diarrhea and vomiting in CCRT (cisplatin) were lower than those in CCRT (cisplatin + gemcitabine). Additionally, the cluster analysis showed that CCRT (cisplatin) had relatively lower incidences of both hematotoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity, and CCRT (paclitaxel) had lower gastrointestinal toxicity than other regimens.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that CCRT (cisplatin + docetaxel) might be the best choice of CCRT regimens in the treatment of CC, and the 5-year OS rate of CCRT (cisplatin + FU + hydroxyurea) might be the highest among these different regimens. CCRT (cisplatin) might have the lowest toxicity among all the CCRT regimens.

Combined chemoradiation of cisplatin versus carboplatin in cervical carcinoma: a single institution experience from Thailand

BACKGROUND

To report the results of combined chemoradiation (CCRT) with cisplatin versus carboplatin in locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2013, 255 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical carcinoma, according to FIGO staging were prospectively assigned to be treated with pelvic radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy given concurrently with cisplatin or carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment outcomes and toxicitiy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and thirteen patients could be evaluated. At a median follow-up time of 43 months (6-69 months), the 3-year local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates were 93, 80.8, 85.0 and 87.3 %, respectively. No statistical difference in terms of local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates between cisplatin and carboplatin treatments was observed in this study. Eighty-six percents of the patients in the carboplatin group could receive more than 4 cycles, while there were only 72 % in the cisplatin group who completed more than 4 cycles (p = 0. 02). In terms of acute toxicity, cisplatin caused significantly more anemia (p = 0.026), neutropenia (p = 0. 044) and nephrotoxicity (p = 0. 031) than carboplatin. No difference in late toxicity was observed in this study.

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin yielded comparable results to cisplatin in concurrent chemo-radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. In addition, carboplatin was associated with a better compliance rate and was associated with less of anemia, neutropenia and nephrotoxicity.

Carboplatin-based chemoradiotherapy in advanced cervical cancer: an alternative to cisplatin-based regimen?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin concomitant with radiotherapy (RT) in cases of locally advanced cervical cancer (CC).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of medical records of 184 patients with cervical cancer stage IIB-IVA who were treated at Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo from May 2008 to December 2012. All patients received complete pelvic region external-beam RT with weekly cisplatin (cis-RT, 40mg/m(2); n=159) or carboplatin (carbo-RT, AUC 2; n=25), followed by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT). Primary endpoint was progression free survival; secondary endpoints were overall survival and overall response rate, which includes complete and partial responses.

RESULTS

Five or more chemotherapy cycles were administered to 87.3% and 84% of the cis-RT- and carbo-RT- treated patients, respectively (p=0.749). Estimated 3-years progression free survival was 59% in the cis-RT group vs 40% in the carbo-RT group (p=0.249). Estimated 3-years overall survival was 70% in the cis-RT group vs 68% in the carbo-RT group (p=0.298). Overall response rate (95.3% cis-RT vs 95.4% carbo-RT; p=0.911) and grade ≥3 toxic effects (8.5% cis-RT vs 11.8% carbo-RT; p=0.757) were similar. In multivariate analysis, only the overall response rate was a significant predictor of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced cervical cancer who are treated with carbo-RT have similar 3-years overall survival, progression free survival, overall response rate, and toxic effects when compared to cis-RT-treated patients. Carbo-RT may be an alternative treatment in patients that cannot receive cisplatin.

Novel agents and treatment techniques to enhance radiotherapeutic outcomes in carcinoma of the uterine cervix

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with locally advanced carcinoma cervix (LACC) using the current standard of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has reached a plateau over the last two decades. Loco-regional failure in first two years of treatment completion and distant metastasis in the subsequent years has put the survival curves at a halt. Strategies of induction and adjuvant chemotherapy have yielded little as has any advancement in techniques of delivery of radiation therapy. This article aims at discussing the current existing literature as well as promising novel strategies to enhance radiotherapeutic outcomes in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

METHODS

The review of English literature included phase I-III trials evaluating either a novel agent, novel application/modifications of an existing treatment regimen or an innovative treatment technique. The studies have been divided in to subsections with summary of most important findings at the end of each section.

RESULTS

Despite CCRT being the 'gold standard' treatment, several issues like optimum drug combination, schedule of drug delivery, combination with molecular targeted agents etc. remain undefined. Taxane, topoisomerase and gemcitabine based regimen needs to be further explored and compared with cisplatin based CCRT regimen. Several approaches like local delivery of cytotoxic agents, use of nano-medicine with CCRT are appearing on horizon with promises for the future. Therapies need to be designed based on the human papillomavirus titers of the patients and incorporation of radiosensitizers as an effective way of palliation with short course of radiotherapy may further enhance the radiotherapeutic outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the studies with novel agents and treatment techniques appear promising. Further research in this arena including incorporation of cost-effectiveness analysis and quality of life issues in future trial designs are warranted.

Serum zinc as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced cancer cervix patients receiving chemo-irradiation: A pilot study

Objective:

To evaluate the prognostic significance of serum Zinc (S.Zn) in locally advanced cancer cervix (LACC) patients treated with chemo-irradiation.

Materials and Methods:

S.Zn values in 34 females with histopathologically (HP) proven LACC (>/= stage II B) were prospectively measured using atomic absorption spectrophotometer pre- and post-treatment. Thirty-four age- and sex-matched healthy individuals were also evaluated for the parameter during the course of the study. After completion of treatment, the patients were divided into 2 groups based on the response, 1 - Complete response (CR) and 2 - Partial/No response (PR/NR). These groups were compared based on the observations of the studied parameter.

Results:

The mean post-treatment S.Zn values were significantly higher in group 1 as compared to group 2 (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

In our study, patients achieving CR had higher mean levels of S.Zn compared to patients achieving PR/NR. We advocate further in-depth studies to evaluate the role of S.Zn in the prognosis of LACC patients treated with chemo-irradiation.