Dead, degenerate, and living cells in conjunctival fluid and mucous thread

NONINVASIVE TEAR FILM BREAK-UP TIME ASSESSMENT USING HANDHELD LIPID LAYER EXAMINATION INSTRUMENT

The aim was to determine feasibility and reliability of noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) assessment using handheld lipid layer examination instrument, and to compare it with standard tear break-up time (TBUT) test. Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 with and 19 without dry eye symptoms. Schein questionnaire was used to assess dry eye symptoms. During examination, three NIBUT measurements were performed on each eye using handheld instrument, followed by three TBUT measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity and logistic regression analysis were generated. Median NIBUT values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group than in control group in all three measurements (9, 8 and 8 s vs. 21, 22 and 21 s; p<0.001). TBUT values showed no significant difference between the groups in the first measurement (p=0.053), but the values were significantly shorter in dry eye symptom group in second and third measurements (p=0.020). The cutoff value to distinguish patients with symptoms of dry eye from control group was 12 seconds for NIBUT and 8 seconds for TBUT, with NIBUT having significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and positive predictive value. NIBUT, measured by handheld lipid layer examination instrument, was superior to TBUT in detecting dry eye.

Dry eye syndrome: developments and lifitegrast in perspective

Dry eye (DE) is a chronic ocular condition with high prevalence and morbidity. It has a complex pathophysiology and is multifactorial in nature. Chronic ocular surface inflammation has emerged as a key component of DE that is capable of perpetuating ocular surface damage and leading to symptoms of ocular pain, discomfort, and visual phenomena. It begins with stress to the ocular surface leading to the production of proinflammatory mediators that induce maturation of resident antigen-presenting cells which then migrate to the lymph nodes to activate CD4 T cells. The specific antigen(s) targeted by these pathogenic CD4⁺ T cells remains unknown. Two emerging theories include self-antigens by autoreactive CD4 T cells or harmless exogenous antigens in the setting of mucosal immunotolerance loss. These CD4 T cells migrate to the ocular surface causing additional inflammation and damage. Lifitegrast is the second topical anti-inflammatory agent to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of DE and the first to show improvement in DE symptoms. Lifitegrast works by blocking the interaction between intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and lymphocyte functional associated antigen-1, which has been shown to be critical for the migration of antigen-presenting cells to the lymph nodes as well as CD4⁺ T cell activation and migration to the ocular surface. In four large multicenter, randomized controlled trials, lifitegrast has proven to be effective in controlling both the signs and symptoms of DE with minimal side effects. Further research should include comparative and combination studies with other anti-inflammatory therapies used for DE.

TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report

The TFOS DEWS II Pathophysiology Subcommittee reviewed the mechanisms involved in the initiation and perpetuation of dry eye disease. Its central mechanism is evaporative water loss leading to hyperosmolar tissue damage. Research in human disease and in animal models has shown that this, either directly or by inducing inflammation, causes a loss of both epithelial and goblet cells. The consequent decrease in surface wettability leads to early tear film breakup and amplifies hyperosmolarity via a Vicious Circle. Pain in dry eye is caused by tear hyperosmolarity, loss of lubrication, inflammatory mediators and neurosensory factors, while visual symptoms arise from tear and ocular surface irregularity. Increased friction targets damage to the lids and ocular surface, resulting in characteristic punctate epithelial keratitis, superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis, filamentary keratitis, lid parallel conjunctival folds, and lid wiper epitheliopathy. Hybrid dry eye disease, with features of both aqueous deficiency and increased evaporation, is common and efforts should be made to determine the relative contribution of each form to the total picture. To this end, practical methods are needed to measure tear evaporation in the clinic, and similarly, methods are needed to measure osmolarity at the tissue level across the ocular surface, to better determine the severity of dry eye. Areas for future research include the role of genetic mechanisms in non-Sjögren syndrome dry eye, the targeting of the terminal duct in meibomian gland disease and the influence of gaze dynamics and the closed eye state on tear stability and ocular surface inflammation.

Tear film stability: a review

Tear film stability can be assessed via a number of tools designed for clinical as well as research purposes. These techniques can give us insights into the tear film, and allow assessment of conditions that can lead to dry eye symptoms, and in severe cases, to significant ocular surface damage and deterioration of vision. Understanding what drives tear film instability and its assessment is also crucial for evaluating existing and new therapies. This review examines various techniques that are used to assess tear film instability: evaluation of tear break-up time and non-invasive break-time; topographic and interferometric techniques; confocal microscopic methods; aberrometry; and visual function tests. It also describes possible contributions of different tear film components; namely meibomian lipids, ocular mucins and proteins, and factors such as age, contact lens wear, ocular surgery and environmental stimuli, that may influence tear film instability.

The challenge of dry eye diagnosis

The currently available methods for the diagnosis of dry eye are still far from being perfect for a variety of reasons. This review attempts to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of both traditional tests (such as Schirmer’s test, break-up time and ocular surface staining) and innovative noninvasive procedures, including tear meniscus height measurement, corneal topography, functional visual acuity, tear interferometry, tear evaporimetry and tear osmolarity assessment.

A solute gradient in the tear meniscus. I. A hypothesis to explain Marx's line

Marx's line is a line of mucosal staining behind the mucocutaneous junction. It can be demonstrated throughout life in all normal lids by staining with lissamine green and related dyes. Of all the body orifices, only the mucosae of the eye and mouth are directly exposed to the atmosphere. In this paper, we suggest that for the eye, this exposure leads to the formation of Marx's line. The tear meniscus thins progressively toward its apex, where it is pinned at the mucocutaneous junction of the lid. It also thins toward the black line, which segregates the meniscus from the tear film after the blink. We predict that, because of the geometry of the tear meniscus, evaporation generates a solute gradient across the meniscus profile in the anteroposterior plane, which peaks at the meniscus apices at the end of the interblink. One outcome would be to amplify the level of tear molarity at these sites so that they reach hyperosmolar proportions. Preliminary mathematical modeling suggests that dilution of this effect by advection and diffusion of solute away from the meniscus apex at the mucocutaneous junction will be restricted by spatial constraints, the presence of tear and surface mucins at this site, and limited fluid flow. We conclude that evaporative water loss from the tear meniscus may result in a physiological zone of hyperosmolar and related stresses to the occlusal conjunctiva, directly behind the mucocutaneous junction. We hypothesize that this stimulates a high epithelial cell turnover at this site, incomplete epithelial maturation, and a failure to express key molecules such as MUC 16 and galectin-3, which, with the tight junctions between surface epithelial cells, are necessary to seal the ocular surface and prevent penetration of dyes and other molecules into the epithelium. This is proposed as the basis for Marx's line. In Part II of this paper (also published in this issue of The Ocular Surface), we address additional pathophysiological consequences of this mechanism, affecting lid margins.

Mucin characteristics of human corneal-limbal epithelial cells that exclude the rose bengal anionic dye

PURPOSE

Rose bengal is an organic anionic dye used to assess damage of the ocular surface epithelium in ocular surface disease. It has been proposed that mucins have a protective role, preventing rose bengal staining of normal ocular surface epithelial cells. The current study was undertaken to evaluate rose bengal staining in a human corneal-limbal epithelial (HCLE) cell line known to produce and glycosylate membrane-associated mucins.

METHODS

HCLE cells were grown to confluence in serum-free medium and switched to DMEM/F12 with 10% serum to promote differentiation. Immunolocalization of the membrane-associated mucins MUC1 and MUC16 and the T-antigen carbohydrate epitope was performed with the monoclonal antibodies HMFG-2 and OC125 and jacalin lectin, respectively. To assess dye uptake, cultures were incubated for 5 minutes with 0.1% rose bengal and photographed. To determine whether exclusion of negatively charged rose bengal requires a negative charge at the cell surface, cells were incubated with fluoresceinated cationized ferritin. The effect of hyperosmotic stress on rose bengal staining in vitro was evaluated by increasing the ion concentration (Ca+2 and Mg+2) in the rose bengal uptake assay.

RESULTS

The cytoplasm and nucleus of confluent HCLE cells cultured in media without serum, lacking the expression of MUC16 but not MUC1, as well as human corneal fibroblasts, which do not express mucins, stained with rose bengal. Culture of HCLE cells in medium containing serum resulted in the formation of islands of stratified cells that excluded rose bengal. Apical cells of the stratified islands produced MUC16 and the T-antigen carbohydrate epitope on their apical surfaces. Colocalization experiments demonstrated that fluoresceinated cationized ferritin did not bind to these stratified cells, indicating that rose bengal is excluded from cells that lack negative charges. Increasing the amounts of divalent cations in the media reduced the cellular area protected against rose bengal uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that stratification and differentiation of corneal epithelial cells, as measured by the capacity to produce the membrane-associated mucin MUC16 and the mucin-associated T-antigen carbohydrate on their apical surfaces provide protection against rose bengal penetrance in vitro and suggest a role for membrane-associated mucins and their oligosaccharides in the protection of ocular surface epithelia.

Diagnosis of dry eye

Dry eve disease is characterized by symptoms, ocular surface damage, reduced tear film stability, and tear hyperosmolarity. There are also inflammatory components. These features can be identified by various kinds of diagnostic tests (symptom questionnaires, ocular surface staining, tear break-up time, and osmometry), although there may not be a direct correlation between the number or severity of symptoms and the degree of ocular surface damage or tear deficiency. Once the diagnosis of dry eye disease has been established, further tests can be used to classify the condition into tear-deficient or evaporative dry eve. The two forms of dry eye are not mutually exclusive and often co-exist. The optimal diagnosis of dry eye disease, therefore, depends on the results of several tests, and this article suggests an appropriate order for performing these tests at a single clinic visit.

The use of vital dyes in corneal disease

Vital dyes such as fluorescein, rose bengal, and lissamine green B, among others, have been an important tool in clinical ophthalmology in diagnosis and evaluation of various ocular surface disorders. Each dye, having a unique chemical structure, has distinct characteristics that allows its preferential use in different ocular pathologies. In this article, history of vital dyes and the use of popular current vital dyes in corneal disease are reviewed.

Patient tolerance and ocular surface staining characteristics of lissamine green versus rose bengal

PURPOSE

To determine patient tolerance and ocular surface staining characteristics of 1% lissamine green versus 1% rose bengal solutions in patients with dry eye and in those with normal ocular surfaces by comparison of subjective sensation and objective staining scores.

METHODS

Twelve patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca and eight subjects with no ocular surface disease recorded their symptoms on a graded scale (0-5) and the duration of symptoms after instillation of one drop of 1% lissamine green and 1% rose bengal on two different occasions in different order. Lissamine green and rose bengal staining patterns were recorded on a graded scale (0-4) by one of the authors.

RESULTS

For patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca mean sensation score with lissamine green (2.42) was significantly lower (P = 0.00006) than with rose bengal (4.58). The duration of symptoms was significantly longer (P = 0.0007) after rose bengal instillation as well. For subjects with no ocular surface disease, mean sensation score with lissamine green (1.375) was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than with rose bengal (2.5). In this group, duration of symptoms also was significantly longer (P = 0.001) after rose bengal instillation. In both groups, there was no difference in objective staining scores.

CONCLUSION

Lissamine green is better tolerated than rose bengal by patients and is equally as effective as rose bengal in evaluating the ocular surface in keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

Comparison of fluorescein and rose bengal staining

The authors have recently reported that rose bengal is not a vital dye, and stains whenever the cultured cells are not covered by such components as albumin and mucin, and such a tear substitute as carboxycellulose. In this report, using cultured cells as well as normal rabbit corneas, they characterize and correlate the staining differences between rose bengal and fluorescein with the differences in their chemical structures. Fluorescein differs from rose bengal in its lack of intrinsic toxicity, photodynamic action, and ability to be blocked by the above-mentioned substances. Fluorescein staining is increased by rapid stromal diffusion and hence can manifest whenever there is disruption of cell-cell junctions. In contrast, rose bengal staining ensues whenever there is deficiency of preocular tear film protection. These experimental data may help interpret the clinical staining properties of these two dyes and enhance the understanding of the pathogenesis of various ocular surface disorders.