Timolol/pilocarpine combination eye drops in open angle glaucoma and in ocular hypertension. A controlled randomized study

Comparison of Two Fixed Beta-Blocker-Pilocarpine Combinations

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of a newly developed ophthalmic solution containing carteolol 2% and pilocarpine (2% (CBS341A) with a timolol 0.5% and pilocarpine 2% fixed combination.

Patients and Methods.

A randomized, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted in 209 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was higher than 21 mm Hg on bet-blocker twice a day alone. The test medications were administered twice daily for 4 months. IOP was measured at 9 and 11 a.m. at the beginning of the study (with beta-blocker alone) and after one and four months of treatment. Adverse effects were recorded.

Results

Both combinations caused a similar, statistically significant decrease in IOP. At four months, in the CBS341A group a 2.4 mm Hg (9%) reduction in IOP was achieved at 9 a.m. and 4.1 mm Hg (17.3%) at 11 a.m. compared with respectively 3 mm Hg (11%) and 4.5 mm Hg (19.5%) in the timolol-pilocarpine group. No statistical difference was observed between the two groups in safety and efficacy.

Conclusions

The carteolol-pilocarpine combination appears as safe and as effective as the timolol-pilocarpine combination in the medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Fixed Combination of Carteolol and Pilocarpine Eye-Drops: A Double-Blind Randomized Cross-Over Trial versus Carteolol Alone on Intra-Ocular Pressure

The effects of carteolol 2% and a fixed combination of carteolol 2% and pilocarpine 2% (CBS 341 A) eye-drops on intraocular pressure (I.O.P.) were compared in a multicenter double-blind, cross-over prospective trial. Twenty-eight patients were initially selected after at least three weeks of carteolol 2%, with a morning I.O.P. greater than 21-mmHg. They received 2 drops a day (b.i.d.), in a random order, alternating two weeks of carteolol 2% alone or two weeks of CBS 341 A. After each two-week period a 12-h I.O.P. curve was plotted. Compared to carteolol the combination reduced I.O.P. on average by around 20% (4 mmHg), with maximum effect 4h after instillation. The effectiveness was confirmed after twelve hours. Some side effects were reported with CBS 341 A, due to the well known pharmacological effects of pilocarpine. The new combination could be useful for second-line therapy in glaucoma.

Use of fixed-dose combination drugs for the treatment of glaucoma

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible visual loss. This potentially blinding disease is a progressive optic neuropathy associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Initial therapy for glaucoma typically consists of topical medications or laser treatment to lower IOP. Frequently, more than one medication is required to achieve adequate control of IOP. However, more medications means more bottles and greater complexity for the patient. There are several potential benefits of fixed combination medications compared with using the individual components separately. These include a reduction in the total number of drops and preservative instilled per day, cost savings, improved tolerability and compliance and avoiding the washout effect resulting from rapid-sequence instillation of multiple drops. Attempts to develop effective fixed combinations of glaucoma medications date back several decades. In recent years, fixed combinations of commonly paired drugs have been approved by various regulatory bodies in different countries and have gained wide acceptance. Current commercially available, fixed combination drugs include the topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonist timolol 0.5% combined with a prostaglandin, a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor or an alpha-adrenoceptor agonist. Although there is no uniformity among registration trial designs, most published literature compares the efficacy of the fixed combination to the individual components and to concomitant use of both components. Various factors inherent to study design such as medication run-in, washout periods and peak and trough effects have to be taken into consideration when analysing the demonstrated efficacy of fixed combinations. Fixed combination treatments offer effective IOP control while reducing the washout effect and exposure to preservatives. They are also convenient. However, fixed combinations also remove the possibility of titrating the individual components both in terms of concentration and timing of administration. In addition, fixed combinations might not always provide the same efficacy as proper use of the individual components. The clinician must make individualised assessments when weighing the convenience of these medications against their limitations for specific patients.

Efficacy and safety of timolol/pilocarpine combination drops in glaucoma patients

The aim of this randomized, double-blind study with two parallel groups was to examine the safety, efficacy and tolerability of two combination eye drops containing 0.5% timolol and 2% pilocarpine (Fotil, Leiras, Finland, and Timpilo, MSD, USA) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Efficacy was determined based on daytime intraocular pressure curve and safety by examining visual fields, visual acuity, optic discs, by determining blood pressure and pulse rate, and by performing Schirmer and fluorescein tests. A total of 89 patients were enrolled, and 71 completed the 10-week treatment period. This study showed that the two combinations of 0.5% timolol maleate and 2% pilocarpine HCl compared in this study were equally effective in reducing intraocular pressure. The decrease in mean daily intraocular pressure from 0 to 10 weeks was 7.48 mmHg for Fotil, and 6.31 for Timpilo. The mean decrease in mean daily intraocular pressure was 29.3% for Fotil, and 26.0% for Timpilo. No significant differences were found between the groups. Adverse event were reported by 70 out of 89 patients by the end of 2 weeks, but were severe enough only in 11 for the treatment to be discontinued. In all others, adverse events were of transient nature and considered mild. In general, adverse events were similar in both study groups. However, burning was more common in patients on Fotil, and blurring of vision and light sensitivity were more common in patients on Timpilo. In patients with no contraindication to beta-blockers, these drugs appeared to be safe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical experience with a fixed dose combination therapy of timolol and pilocarpine used twice daily in the management of chronic open angle glaucoma

Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients with primary chronic open angle glaucoma deemed controlled for 12 months were converted from timolol 0.25% or 0.5% b.d. and pilocarpine 2% q.i.d. to a combination drop (TP2) of combined timolol 0.5% and pilocarpine 2% given b.d. Mean intraocular pressures (IOP) were 18.68 +/- 2.84 mmHg at 1 month, 18.81 +/- 2.56 mmHg at 3 months and 18.56 +/- 2.01 mmHg at 6 months. These values were significantly higher than the initial IOP of 17.48 +/- 2.2 mmHg (p values 0.0006, 0.0001 and 0.0004 respectively). However, 1 month following reconversion to initial therapy the IOP was 17.68 +/- 2.67 mmHg, which was not significantly higher than the initial IOP (p = 0.46). In addition, of 8 eyes uncontrolled during the course of the study, 6 became controlled following reconversion to initial treatment. Combination therapy of TP2 b.d. cannot be recommended to control IOP satisfactorily in patients maintained on timolol 0.25% or 0.5% b.d. and pilocarpine 2% q.i.d.

Combined timolol and pilocarpine vs pilocarpine alone and timolol alone in the treatment of glaucoma

We compared the effects of pilocarpine 4% alone, timolol 0.5% alone, and a combination of timolol 0.5% and pilocarpine 4% in the treatment of glaucoma. We treated 43 patients with glaucoma using each drug and then with the combination of drugs for four weeks each. Only patients with a morning intraocular pressure of at least 24 mm Hg without treatment were included. The patients were examined, after one and four weeks of treatment with pilocarpine, timolol, or combined timolol 0.5% and pilocarpine 4%, before the morning dose and at two and five hours after it. At the end of the study, the mean reduction in intraocular pressure from baseline was 9.2 +/- 5.1 mm Hg (28.5% +/- 12.7%) with combined timolol 0.5% and pilocarpine 4%, 5.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg (17.6% +/- 9.7%) with pilocarpine, and 7.5 +/- 5.0 mm Hg (21.2% +/- 12.6%) with timolol. Intraocular pressure was consistently lower with the combination treatment than with timolol or pilocarpine alone. We believe that this combined solution of timolol-pilocarpine is a valuable contribution to the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

Twelve-hour IOP control obtained by a single dose of timolol/pilocarpine combination eye drops

The 12 h IOP control achieved by a single application of a newly developed ophthalmic solution containing 0.5% timolol and 2% resp. 4% pilocarpine was compared with that obtained by 1 dose of timolol 0.5% alone in 33 patients with manifest open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The combined solutions gave a significantly better 12 h IOP control, evidenced by both a reduced mean diurnal IOP and a decreased frequency of larger pressure peaks.

Timolol-pilocarpine combined vs timolol and pilocarpine given separately

In a controlled, double-observer, multicenter study, we compared the effect of a fixed combination of timolol 0.5%-pilocarpine 4% twice a day with that of timolol 0.5% twice a day plus pilocarpine 4% three times a day in 80 patients with open-angle glaucoma whose intraocular pressure was greater than 21 mm Hg on timolol 0.5% twice a day alone. Administered twice daily, the combination drug lowered intraocular pressure as effectively as concomitant treatment with timolol twice a day and pilocarpine three times a day. No statistically significant differences in reduction of intraocular pressure were found between the two groups nor were any unexpected side effects observed.