Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after posterior lamellar keratoplasty

Visual function after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial

AIMS

To compare best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity and endothelial cell density (ECD) after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

A randomised, single-blinded, single-centre design was used. 72 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract were randomised to UT-DSAEK or DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. 27 patients with cataract were included in a control group and treated with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. The primary outcome was BCVA at 12 months.

RESULTS

Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK resulted in better BCVA with mean differences of 6.1 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) (p=0.001) after 3 months, 7.4 ETDRS (p<0.001) after 6 months and 5.7 ETDRS (p<0.001) after 12 months. The control group obtained significantly better BCVA with a mean difference of 5.2 ETDRS (p<0.001) compared with DMEK 12 months postoperatively. Compared with UT-DSAEK, contrast sensitivity was significantly better 3 months after DMEK with a mean difference of 0.10 LogCS (p=0.03). However, our study found no effect after 12 months (p=0.08). ECD was significantly lower after UT-DSAEK compared with DMEK with mean differences of 332 cells/mm2 (p<0.01) after 3 months, 296 cells/mm2 (p<0.01) after 6 months and 227 cells/mm2 (p=0.03) after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK resulted in better BCVA 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Twelve months postoperatively, DMEK had a higher ECD than UT-DSAEK; however, no difference in contrast sensitivity was found.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04417959.

Diurnal Variation in Straylight in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy and Controls

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to investigate diurnal changes in intraocular straylight in relation to other corneal parameters and subjective complaints in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and healthy controls.

METHODS

This is a prospective study conducted in 2 tertiary care hospitals in Germany and the Netherlands. Patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (n = 71) and healthy controls (n = 34) were included. Patients with Fuchs dystrophy were grouped by the presence of subjective complaints and measured over multiple time points during the day. Measurements included intraocular straylight using the C-Quant and corneal thickness and backscatter using a Scheimpflug camera. A separate group of healthy controls was measured intensively with repeated straylight measurements directly after waking. An exponential decay model was used to model the diurnal change.

RESULTS

Healthy controls showed an average straylight baseline of 1.17 log(s) with an increase in straylight after waking of 0.22 log(s). In the repeated measurements subgroup, the increase in morning straylight lasted for 22 minutes. Patients with Fuchs dystrophy showed a morning increase in straylight of 0.21 log(s) present up to 4 hours after waking before reaching an average baseline of 1.30 log(s). Straylight was positively correlated with anterior corneal backscatter, r = 0.21, P = 0.022, and corneal thickness, r = 0.46, P < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthy eyes experience a diurnal straylight increase similar to patients with Fuchs dystrophy in intensity. However, in Fuchs dystrophy, the resolution of increased straylight is prolonged over multiple hours compared with minutes in healthy eyes. This suggests pathological exacerbation of a physiological diurnal change. This mechanism can play a role in subjective complaints experienced by patients with Fuchs dystrophy.

Transcriptomic Profiling of Human Limbus-Derived Stromal/Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Novel Mechanistic Insights into the Pathways Involved in Corneal Wound Healing

Limbus-derived stromal/mesenchymal stem cells (LMSCs) are vital for corneal homeostasis and wound healing. However, despite multiple pre-clinical and clinical studies reporting the potency of LMSCs in avoiding inflammation and scarring during corneal wound healing, the molecular basis for the ability of LMSCs remains unknown. This study aimed to uncover the factors and pathways involved in LMSC-mediated corneal wound healing by employing RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) in human LMSCs for the first time. We characterized the cultured LMSCs at the stages of initiation (LMSC−P0) and pure population (LMSC−P3) and subjected them to RNA-Seq to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in comparison to native limbus and cornea, and scleral tissues. Of the 28,000 genes detected, 7800 DEGs were subjected to pathway-specific enrichment Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. These DEGs were involved in Wnt, TGF-β signaling pathways, and 16 other biological processes, including apoptosis, cell motility, tissue remodeling, and stem cell maintenance, etc. Two hundred fifty-four genes were related to wound healing pathways. COL5A1 (11.81 ± 0.48) and TIMP1 (20.44 ± 0.94) genes were exclusively up-regulated in LMSC−P3. Our findings provide new insights involved in LMSC-mediated corneal wound healing.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Development of Contrast Sensitivity and Color Vision in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To assess the developments in contrast sensitivity, color vision, and subjective perception after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

Included in this study were pseudophakic, unilateral DMEK patients with bilateral FECD having a follow-up period of 6 months (n = 23). The mean age at surgery was 70 years (range: 52-81 years). Pseudophakic eyes without history of other ocular pathology or surgery served as a control (n = 10). Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity and Panel-D15 color vision tests were used. Best-corrected visual acuity, modified visual functioning questionnaire-25, central corneal thickness, and endothelial cell density were assessed. We visualized the subjective impression of patients with bilateral FECD after unilateral DMEK in a subgroup using Photoshop CS6.

RESULTS

Contrast sensitivity improved significantly from 1.35 ± 0.26 to 1.64 ± 0.17 (P = 0.002; control eyes: 1.92 ± 0.09). No difference in the color vision error score was observed for preoperative and postoperative eyes (P = 0.063). The best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly after surgery (P = 0.001). The average values in the Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution were 0.59 ± 0.42 preoperatively and 0.1 ± 0.10 postoperatively (control eyes: 0.01 ± 0.03). Examinations revealed a decrease of the central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density after surgery (P = 0.001; P = 0.001, respectively). Scores in the general and the driving questionnaire were significantly higher after surgery (P = 0.001; P = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed significant improvement in subjective patient satisfaction and contrast sensitivity. Spontaneous subjective color vision improvement might be explained by significantly improved contrast sensitivity. Contrast sensitivity might be considered as a parameter in preoperative decision-making and evaluation of surgical outcome.

Influence of corneal guttae and nuclear cataract on contrast sensitivity

AIMS

To evaluate the contrast sensitivity in patients with nuclear cataract and corneal guttae compared to patients with nuclear cataract without guttae.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-centre case series, 50 eyes of 50 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Patients with corneal guttae and nuclear cataract (n=25, study group) underwent triple Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Patients with nuclear cataract and healthy corneas underwent cataract surgery (n=25, control group). Inclusion criteria were preoperative best-corrected visual acuity ≥20/40, no corneal oedema and similar lens opacity (nuclear opalescence 2.0-2.9). Outcome measures included MARS letter and OPTEC 6500P contrast sensitivity test, corneal volume, central corneal thickness and anterior and posterior corneal densitometry.

RESULTS

Preoperative MARS letter and OPTEC 6500P contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the study group (MARS: p<0.001; OPTEC 6500P: p<0.007 at low spatial frequencies in daylight with and without glare and nightlight without glare). After surgery, there was no significant difference in MARS letter contrast sensitivity between groups (p=0.225). OPTEC 6500P contrast sensitivity remained significantly lower in the study group in daylight and nightlight with and without glare at most spatial frequencies (p<0.01) postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative corneal volume, central corneal thickness and anterior corneal densitometry were equal in both groups (p>0.05). Posterior densitometry was significantly higher in the study group than in the control group preoperatively (p<0.001) but turned into equal values postoperatively (p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal guttae cause an additional significant decrease in contrast sensitivity in eyes with nuclear cataract. This is in favour of performing a triple DMEK even in eyes with a visual acuity of ≥20/40.

Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: a controlled prospective study on visual recovery after endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the determining factors of vision and subjective outcome after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FECD).

METHODS

In a prospective study, 41 FECD patients who received DSAEK were compared to 40 cataract patients with normal corneas who received cataract surgery (control group). Subjects were recruited between March 2013 and July 2014. Observational procedures included the following: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), Catquest-9SF questionnaire, Scheimpflug tomography and anterior OCT. Examinations were carried out before surgery and at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. Main outcome measures were associations between corneal optics and visual parameters, as well as subjective improvement (Catquest-9SF effect size) RESULTS: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) negatively correlated with anterior higher-order aberrations (HOA's) (p < 0.001) and central corneal thickness (p = 0.001). Contrast sensitivity (CS) was negatively correlated with anterior HOA's (p = 0.002) and positively correlated with posterior densitometry (p = 0.008). Catquest-9SF effect size was 1.32 (CI: 1.0-1.6) in the control group, 1.84 (CI: 1.4-2.3) in FECD patients who received phacoemulsification and intra-ocular lens implantation in combination with DSAEK (n = 26) and 1.37 (CI: 0.6-2.1) in pseudophakic FECD patients who received DSAEK (n = 15).

CONCLUSIONS

DSAEK surgery leads to considerable improvement in patient-reported outcome in FECD patients. There was a strong correlation between anterior HOA's and vision after DSAEK, suggesting that anterior corneal pathology constitutes the major limitation for visual recovery after DSAEK.

Determinants of visual quality after endothelial keratoplasty

Endothelial keratoplasty is now favored over full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty for corneal decompensation secondary to endothelial dysfunction. Although endothelial keratoplasty has evolved as surgeons strive to improve outcomes, fewer patients than expected achieve best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 despite healthy grafts and no ocular comorbidities. Reasons for this remain unclear, with theories including anterior stromal changes, differences in graft thickness and regularity, induced high-order aberrations, and the nature of the graft-host interface. Newer iterations of endothelial keratoplasty such as thin manual Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, ultrathin automated Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty have achieved rates of 20/20 acuity of approximately 50%, comparable to modern cataract surgery, and it may be that a ceiling exists, particularly in the older age group of patients. Establishing the relative contribution of the factors that determine visual quality following endothelial keratoplasty will help drive further innovation, optimizing visual and patient-reported outcomes while improving surgical efficacy and safety.

Vitreous floaters: Etiology, diagnostics, and management

Vitreous is a hydrated extracellular matrix comprised primarily of water, collagens, and hyaluronan organized into a homogeneously transparent gel. Gel liquefaction results from molecular alterations with dissociation of collagen from hyaluronan and aggregation of collagen fibrils forming fibers that cause light scattering and hence symptomatic floaters, especially in myopia. With aging, gel liquefaction and weakened vitreoretinal adhesion result in posterior vitreous detachment, the most common cause of primary symptomatic floaters arising from the dense collagen matrix of the posterior vitreous cortex. Recent studies indicate that symptomatic floaters are not only more prevalent, but also have a negative impact on the quality of life that is greater than previously appreciated. We review the literature concerning management of symptomatic vitreous floaters, currently either with observation, vitrectomy, or Nd:YAG laser. Published evidence is consistent with a low-risk profile and excellent success rate for floater vitrectomy, particularly with sutureless small gauge instruments and a limited core vitrectomy without PVD induction. Nd:YAG laser treatment of floaters, reported less commonly, claims resolution of floaters ranging between 0% and 100%; however, both peer-reviewed literature and assertions on web-based nonpeer-reviewed laser vitreolysis sites remain to be substantiated, and at present only vitrectomy has proven value. Prospective studies using objective, quantitative outcome measures are required to assess the relative efficacy and safety of these two procedures as well as new therapies such as pharmacologic vitreolysis.

Vitrectomy for floaters: prospective efficacy analyses and retrospective safety profile

PURPOSE

Floaters impact vision but the mechanism is unknown. We hypothesize that floaters reduce contrast sensitivity function, which can be normalized by vitrectomy, and that minimally invasive vitrectomy will have lower incidences of retinal tears (reported at 30%) and cataracts (50-76%).

METHODS

Seventy-six eyes (34 phakic) with floaters were evaluated in 2 separate studies. Floater etiologies were primarily posterior vitreous detachment in 61 of 76 eyes (80%) and myopic vitreopathy in 24 of 76 eyes (32%). Minimally invasive 25G vitrectomy was performed without posterior vitreous detachment induction, leaving anterior vitreous, and using nonhollow probes for cannula extraction. Efficacy was studied prospectively (up to 9 months) in 16 floater cases with Freiburg Acuity Contrast Testing (Weber index [%W] reproducibility = 92.1%) and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Safety was separately evaluated in 60 other cases followed up on an average of 17.5 months (range, 3-51 months).

RESULTS

Floater eyes had 67% contrast sensitivity function attenuation (4.0 ± 2.3 %W; control subjects = 2.4 ± 0.9 %W, P < 0.013). After vitrectomy, contrast sensitivity function normalized in each case at 1 week (2.0 ± 1.4 %W, P < 0.01) and remained normal at 1 month (2.0 ± 1.0 %W, P < 0.003) and 3 months to 9 months (2.2 ± 1.5 %W, P < 0.018). Visual Function Questionnaire was 28.3% lower in floater patients (73.2 ± 15.6, N = 16) than in age-matched control subjects (93.9 ± 8.0, N = 12, P < 0.001), and postoperatively improved by 29.2% (P < 0.001). In the safety study of 60 floater cases treated with vitrectomy, none developed retinal breaks, infection, or glaucoma after a mean follow-up of 17.5 months. Only 8 of 34 cases (23.5%) required cataract surgery (none younger than 53 years) at an average of 15 months postvitrectomy.

CONCLUSION

Floaters lower contrast sensitivity function, which normalizes after vitrectomy. Visual Function Questionnaire quantified improvement in satisfaction. Not inducing posterior vitreous detachment reduced retinal tear incidence from 30% to 0% (P < 0.007). Postvitrectomy cataract incidence was reduced from 50% to 23.5% (P < 0.02). This approach thus seems effective and safe in alleviating the visual dysfunction induced by floaters.

Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction

Surgical correction of refractive errors is becoming increasingly popular. In the 1990s, the excimer laser revolutionized the field of corneal refractive surgery with PRK and LASIK, and lately refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) of intracorneal tissue, using only a femtosecond laser, has become possible. Two new procedures were developed, ReLEx flex (FLEX) and ReLEx smile (SMILE). Until this thesis, only a few long-term studies of PRK with a relatively limited number of patients had been published; therefore, this thesis intended to retrospectively evaluate long-term outcomes after PRK for all degrees of myopia for a large number of patients. Furthermore, a prospective contralateral eye study comparing FLEX and SMILE, when treating high to moderate degrees of myopia, had not been performed prior to this study. This was the second aim of this thesis. In the first study, results from 160 PRK patients (289 eyes) were presented. Preoperative spherical equivalent ranged from -1.25 to -20.25 D, with 78% having low myopia (<-6 D). Average follow-up time was 16 years (range 13-19 years), making this the longest published follow-up study on PRK patients. Outcomes from eyes with low myopia were generally superior to outcomes from eyes with high myopia, at final follow-up. Seventy-two percent were within ± 1.00 D of target refraction, as compared to 47% of eyes with high myopia. However, results from a subgroup of unilateral treated PRK patients indicated that refraction at final follow-up was affected by myopic progression. Fifty percent of eyes with low myopia had uncorrected 20/20 distance visual acuity or better, as compared to 22% of eyes with high myopia. Haze did not occur if attempted corrections were <-4 D, and only eyes with high myopia lost two lines or more of CDVA (corrected distance visual acuity). Eighty-one per cent were satisfied or very satisfied with their surgery.

CONCLUSION

The results support the continued use of the excimer laser for corneal surface ablation as a treatment option for correction of low degrees of myopia, and as the treatment of choice for subgroups of refractive patients (thin corneas, etc.). The results also highlight that treatment of higher degrees of myopia with standard PRK should only be done today under special circumstances, due to low refractive predictability, and high risk of corneal haze. Technological advances since then should be taken into account when comparing these results with contemporary techniques. In the second study, 35 patients were randomized to receive FLEX in one eye and SMILE in the other. Preoperative spherical equivalent refraction ranged from -6 to -10 D with low degrees of astigmatism. A total of 34 patients completed the 6 month follow-up period. Refractive and visual outcomes were very similar for the two methods, as well as tear film measurements and changes in corneal biomechanics. Ninety-seven percent were within ± 1.00 D of target refraction, no eyes lost two lines or more of CDVA, and contrast sensitivity was unaffected after both procedures. The changes in higher-order aberrations were also very similar. There were also no differences in tear film parameters 6 months after surgery, although less postoperative foreign body sensation was reported within the first week after surgery in SMILE eyes. Corneal sublayer pachymetry measurements demonstrated equally increased epithelial thickness 6 months after surgery. Contrary to expectations, it was not possible to measure the theoretical biomechanical advantages of a small corneal incision in SMILE as compared to a corneal flap in FLEX. The main differences between FLEX and SMILE were found when the corneal nerves and intraoperative complications were evaluated. Thus, corneal sensitivity was better preserved and corneal nerve morphology was less affected after SMILE, but intraoperative complications occurred more frequently, although without visual sequela. Finally, 97% were satisfied or very satisfied with both their surgeries.

CONCLUSION

The results support the continued use of both FLEX and SMILE for treatment of up to high degrees of myopia. Overall, refractive and visual results for both procedures were good and similar, but from a biological point of view, the less invasive SMILE technique is more attractive, as demonstrated in this study, despite being slightly more surgically demanding than FLEX.

Correlation between visual acuity and interface reflectivity measured by pentacam following DSAEK

PURPOSE

Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is an advanced method of lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. In comparison with penetrating keratoplasty, visual rehabilitation seems to be faster. Final visual outcome of DSAEK, however, seems to be limited, especially in comparison with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DSAEK cases without graft failure often do not show any definite correlate for the reduced optical performance. In this study, we tried to correlate visual acuity following DSAEK with interface reflectivity as measured by a rotating Scheimpflug system.

METHODS

We examined 14 eyes of 13 patients with the pentacam for 2-11 months following DSAEK. Reflectivity of the interface region in the centre of the optical axis as well as central corneal thickness was determined. Statistical correlation between interface reflectivity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness and follow-up time was drawn (multifactorial linear regression analysis).

RESULTS

Statistically significant correlation between interface reflectivity and BSCVA as well as follow-up time was found. Reflectivity was highest in regions of interface (metal) particles. There was no statistically significant correlation between interface reflectivity and central corneal thickness.

CONCLUSION

We present a measurable correlate for reduced visual outcome following DSAEK despite a clear graft. Inverse correlation between interface reflectivity and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) indicates that irregularities or scarring in the interface region may influence the optical quality following DSAEK.

Detection of early visual impairment in patients with epiretinal membrane

PURPOSE

Patients with epiretinal membrane sometimes complain of impaired central visual function, despite good best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), as measured by visual acuity (VA) charts. Here, we evaluate early epiretinal membrane-induced changes in central VA.

METHODS

Subjects were 72 eyes of 36 patients with epiretinal membrane in only one eye and a BCVA in each eye better than 1.0, as measured by conventional Landolt C chart, at the Retina Division Clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University Hospital, between December 2010 and November 2011. The conventional Landolt VA, functional VA (FVA) and contrast VA measurements were taken after a general eye examination. For the FVA, Landolt optotypes were sequentially displayed every 2 seconds, which size was changed according to the correctness of the answer. To exclude the influence of other diseases, a standard Schirmer test was performed to diagnose dry eye, and corneal and lens densities were evaluated.

RESULTS

Average BCVA measured by Landolt C chart was not changed between affected and unaffected fellow eyes. However, the affected eyes showed a poorer FVA score (0.21 ± 0.12, affected; 0.09 ± 0.12, fellow) and visual maintenance ratio (VMR) (0.90 ± 0.04, affected; 0.94 ± 0.04, fellow), measured by the FVA system, and contrast VA score (0.35 ± 0.11, affected; 0.25 ± 0.14, fellow) than fellow eyes. The FVA and contrast VA values were correlated with the presence of epiretinal membrane, but not with the presence of dry eye, cataract and corneal densities.

CONCLUSION

FVA and contrast VA results reflected early changes in central visual function caused by epiretinal membrane, which were not detected by conventional Landolt BCVA.

Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity

BACKGROUND

Technical innovations in corneal transplantation have now made it possible to replace only the diseased part of the cornea, rather than the entire cornea as in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Patients with endothelial insufficiency due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, bullous keratopathy, or endothelial failure after keratoplasty can be treated with the new methods of posterior lamellar corneal transplantation: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). It remains unclear which of these methods is better in the individual case.

METHODS

We review the pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search in Medline and the Cochrane Library employing the terms "DMEK," "DSAEK," "DSEK," and "posterior lamellar keratoplasty." The publications considered in this article are those that contain important clinical information on the operative techniques.

RESULTS

No randomized controlled trials of these techniques have been published to date. Numerous case series have shown that patients who undergo DSAEK (postoperative visual acuity ≥0.5 in 38-100%), and especially those who undergo it in early or intermediate stages of endothelial insufficiency, achieve a better functional result more rapidly than patients treated with PKP (postoperative visual acuity ≥0.5 in 47-61%). Only 23-47% of DSAEK patients achieve a visual acuity of 0.8 or more, compared to 36-79% of DMEK patients. Moreover, transplant rejection is seen in only 1-3% of cases of DMEK, compared to 0-8% after DSAEK and 1-23% after PKP.

CONCLUSION

Numerous case series show clear advantages of DMEK over DSAEK, which, in turn, has better results than PKP. Nonetheless, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine which operative method is best in each stage of corneal disease.

Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics

Corneal transplantation is among the most successful solid organ transplants. However, despite low rejection rates of grafts in the ‘low-risk’ setting, rejection can be as high as 70% when grafted into ‘high-risk’ recipient beds. Under normal homeostatic conditions, the avascular cornea provides a unique environment that facilitates immune and angiogenic privilege. An imbalance in pro-inflammatory, angiogenic and lymphangiogenic mediators leads to a breakdown in corneal immune privilege with a consequent host response against the donor graft. Recent developments in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties have reduced the rates of graft rejection even more, while providing improved visual outcomes. The corneal layer against which an immune response is initiated, largely determines reversibility of the acute episode. While epithelial and stromal graft rejection may be treated with topical corticosteroids with higher success, acute endothelial rejection mandates a more aggressive approach to therapy due to the lack of regenerative capacity of this layer. However, current immunosuppressive regimens come with the caveat of ocular and systemic side effects, making prolonged aggressive treatment undesirable. With the advent of biologics, efficacious therapies with a superior side effect profile are on the horizon. In our review we discuss the mediators of ocular immune privilege, the roles of cellular and molecular immune players in graft rejection, with a focus on human leukocyte antigen and antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical risk factors for graft rejection and compare rates of rejection in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties to traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Lastly, we present the current and upcoming measures of therapeutic strategies to manage and treat graft rejection, including an overview of biologics and small molecule therapy.