Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Tamsulosin for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as an initial dose in 1,219 Korean patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms: data from a phase IV study

Background

An initial dose of tamsulosin 0.2 mg is frequently prescribed for Asian men. We investigated the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as the initial dose in Korean men with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) in everyday clinical practice.

Materials and methods

A phase IV study was conducted in South Korea. Eligible patients were prescribed tamsulosin 0.4 mg for 6 months. We excluded patients with previous exposure to LUTS drugs and patients with an international prostate symptom score (IPSS) < 8.

Results

The mean total IPSS, storage subscore, voiding symptoms subscore, and quality of life significantly decreased from 18.0, 10.8, 7.2, and 3.8 to 12.8, 7.5, 5.3, and 2.6, respectively, after 6 months of treatment. The number of nocturia episodes significantly decreased from 3.0 to 2.2 in patients who reported at least 2 nocturia events at baseline. A mean reduction in the IPSS was quantitatively equivalent in all age groups. The mean reduction in the IPSS was greater in the IPSS ≥ 20 group than in the IPSS < 20 group (mean reduction in the total IPSS: -2.6 in the IPSS < 20 group; -9.4 in the IPSS ≥ 20 group). All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild. The most frequently recorded treatment-emergent adverse event was dizziness, which was reported in 22 patients (1.8%).

Conclusion

Treatment of LUTS with tamsulosin 0.4 mg as the initial dose for 6 months in Korean men was effective in improving LUTS and showed a favorable safety profile in a real-life setting.

Evaluation of Alpha 1 Adrenoceptor Antagonist Dose Increase Therapy: An Essential Strategy for Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Introduction

There have been a number of reports on dose increase therapy (DI-T) with the alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonists (α1-blockers) naftopidil and tamsulosin for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Methods and Results

The reports on DI-T (naftopidil 75 mg/d, tamsulosin 0.4 mg/d) in non-responders to low-dose initial therapy (LI-T, naftopidil 50 mg/d, tamsulosin 0.2 mg/d) were summarized. In each study, a non-responder was defined as a patient without sufficient improvements on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life, maximum flow rate of urine, or treatment satisfaction. These reports showed that 22.4-76.1% of patients were non-responders to LI-T, indicating that a novel treatment strategy for such patients is important. Moreover, 22.5-90.0% of non-responders to LI-T showed a response to DI-T, which achieved the same level of efficacy as low-dose maintenance therapy. Specifically, the improvements of the IPSS voiding symptom sub-score and maximum flow rate of urine were superior. The predictive factors for non-response to α1-blockers LI-T were insufficient improvement of subjective symptoms and objective findings during LI-T. These patients require high-dose initial therapy or DI-T at an early stage, since adverse events associated with naftopidil and tamsulosin do not show a dose-response relationship.

Conclusions

DI-T with α1-blockers has high potential as an essential treatment strategy for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Evidence Is Enough?: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Tamsulosin 0.2 mg and Tamsulosin 0.4 mg as an Initial Therapeutic Dose in Asian Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

Purpose

We compared the efficacy of tamsulosin between 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg in Asian prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients using network meta-analysis due to lack of studies with direct comparison.

Methods

The literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Keywords used were “BPH,” “tamsulosin,” “placebo.” Experimental groups were defined as tamsulosin 0.2 mg (Tam 0.2) and 0.4 mg (Tam 0.4) and common control group was defined as placebo for indirect treatment comparison. Mixed treatment comparison was performed including one direct comparison study.

Results

Seven studies met the eligible criteria. Indirect treatment comparison revealed that total International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) and quality of life score of IPSS were not significantly different in Tam 0.2 and Tam 0.4 (P>0.05). There was no significant difference of maximal flow rate and postvoid residual urine volume in Tam 0.2 and Tam 0.4 (P>0.05). Mixed treatment comparison including one direct comparison study showed inconsistency (P<0.001). Therefore, analysis using direct treatment comparison effect sizes of Tam 0.2 vs. placebo and Tam 0.4 vs. placebo was done and there was no significant difference.

Conclusions

Network meta-analysis showed no difference of efficacy between tamsulosin 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg and the evidence of tamsulosin 0.4 mg as initial dose for Asian BPH patient seems to be insufficient. Therefore, initial dose of tamsulosin for Asian BPH patient should be 0.2 mg.