Metastases or benign adrenal lesions in patients with histopathological verification of lung cancer: Can CT texture analysis distinguish?

INTRODUCTION

Distant metastases are found in the many of patients with lung cancer at time of diagnosis. Several diagnostic tools are available to distinguish between metastatic spread and benign lesions in the adrenal gland. However, all require additional diagnostic steps after the initial CT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if texture analysis of CT-abnormal adrenal glands on the initial CT correctly differentiates between malignant and benign lesions in patients with confirmed lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study 160 patients with endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy from the left adrenal gland and a contrast-enhanced CT in portal venous phase were assessed with texture analysis. A region of interest encircling the entire adrenal gland was used and from this dataset the slice with the largest cross section of the lesion was analyzed individually.

RESULTS

Several texture parameters showed statistically significantly difference between metastatic and benign lesions but with considerable between-groups overlaps in confidence intervals. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using ROC-curves, and in univariate binary logistic regression the area under the curve ranged from 36 % (Kurtosis 0.5) to 69 % (Entropy 2.5) compared to 73 % in the best fitting model using multivariate binary logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

In lung cancer patients with abnormal adrenal gland at imaging, adrenal gland texture analyses appear not to have any role in discriminating benign from malignant lesions.

Characterization of Lung Tumors that the Pulmonologist can Biopsy from the Esophagus with Endosonography (EUS-B-FNA)

BACKGROUND

According to guidelines, it is possible to biopsy lung tumors "immediately adjacent to the esophagus" with EUS-B-FNA. However, it is unknown what "immediately adjacent" exactly means.

OBJECTIVE

to investigate the possibility of achieving EUS-B-FNA biopsies from a lung tumor depending on the distance from the esophagus and to establish the maximal allowable distance between the tumor and the esophagus.

METHODS

In a prospective observational study, we included patients with a lung tumor located maximum 6 cm from the esophagus and indication of EUS-B-FNA from the tumor. The tumors were of different sizes. In a plot presenting the tumor size-distance relationship in cases with (biopsy) versus without (non-biopsy) successful EUS-B-FNA, a separation line representing the threshold between the groups were identified and a biopsy-index equation established. The maximal tumor-size corrected distance (TSCD) was calculated using the residuals to the separation line.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients were included. EUS-B-FNA from the lung tumor was possible in 46 patients. All tumors with a distance from the esophagus below 19 mm could be biopsied. The maximal allowable esophagus-tumor distance depended on tumor size. From the separation line, a biopsy-index equation was established with the sensitivity of 93.5%, a specificity of 100%, and total accuracy of 95.7%. The TSCD was 31 mm (sensitivity: 95.7%, specificity 75.0%, and accuracy: 88.6%).

CONCLUSION

We established a biopsy-index equation to predict the achievability of a lung tumor using EUS-B-FNA depending on distance to esophagus and tumor size. A general maximal TSCD was 31 mm.

Accuracy and consequences of same-day, invasive lung cancer workup - a retrospective study in patients treated with surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Though widely used, little is known about accuracy and efficacy of same-day, invasive workup of suspected lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of same-day, invasive lung cancer workup (diagnosis and mediastinal staging), and to identify differences between patients without (Group A) or with (Group B) need for resampling.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients referred for surgical treatment for localised lung cancer after invasive diagnostic and staging workup at our unit. Data were extracted from electronic medical files. Surgical specimens served as gold standard for correct diagnosis and stage.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (peripheral lesion: 84%; mediastinal staging: 97%) were included. After same-day, invasive workup, 71% had no need for further invasive workup (Group A), while 29% had (Group B). Group A differed significantly from Group B in fewer invasive tests, fewer days from referral to surgery, and lower pneumothorax incidence, while no differences were observed in diagnostic accuracy, cancer subtype, tumour size, tumour stage, peripheral lesion, nodal involvement, gender, or presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tumour located in right upper lobe was associated with need for resampling.

DISCUSSION

Our retrospective study suggests that same-day, invasive workup for lung cancer is safe, accurate, and efficacious in reducing time to therapy, even in patients with small lesions and low tumour burden.