Resuscitation Endpoints in Trauma

Utility of admission lactate concentration, lactate variables, and shock index in outcome assessment in dogs diagnosed with shock

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether admission venous plasma lactate concentration, calculated lactate variables, or shock index (SI) could discriminate hospital survivors from nonsurvivors in dogs admitted with shock.

DESIGN

Prospective investigation performed over a 19-month period.

SETTING

Large urban private teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Twenty-three dogs consecutively admitted to the ICU from January 2008 to July 2009 with initial peripheral venous plasma lactate concentration >2 mmol/L (18.0 mg/dL) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters consistent with shock.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and venous plasma lactate concentrations were serially recorded at predefined time points and used to calculate SI (SI = heart rate/systolic blood pressure) and lactate variables, including lactime (time lactate > 2.0 mmol/L), lactate clearance ([lactate_initial - lactate_delayed ]/lactate_initial × 100), and LAC_AREA (area under the lactate concentration versus time curve). Primary outcome was survival to discharge. Overall survival rate was 61%. Admission venous plasma lactate concentration did not differ between groups (P = 0.2). Lactime was shorter in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P = 0.02). Lactate clearance at 1, 10, 16, 24, and 36 hours, and final lactate clearance were greater in survivors versus nonsurvivors (P < 0.05). LAC_AREA at time intervals 0-1, 1-4, 4-10, 10-16, 16-24, 24-30, and 30-36 hours was larger in nonsurvivors versus survivors (P < 0.05). Total LAC_AREA did not differ between groups (P = 0.09). Admission SI and time to normalize SI (SI < 0.9) were not different between survivors and nonsurvivors (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

While admission venous plasma lactate concentration could not discriminate between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, lactate variables showed clinical utility to predict outcome in dogs with shock. Further studies are needed to determine SI reference ranges and optimal SI cut-off values to improve its prognostic ability in sick dogs.

Massive transfusion: new insights

Massive transfusion (MT) is used for the treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhage. Earlier definitive control of life-threatening hemorrhage has significantly improved patient outcomes, but MT is still required. A number of recent advances in the area of MT have emerged, including the use of "hypotensive" or "delayed" resuscitation for victims of penetrating trauma before hemorrhage is controlled and "hemostatic resuscitation" with increased use of plasma and platelet transfusions in an attempt to maintain coagulation. These advances include the earlier use of hemostatic blood products (plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate), recombinant factor VIIa as an adjunct to the treatment of dilutional and consumptive coagulopathy, and a reduction in the use of isotonic crystalloid resuscitation. MT protocols have been developed to simplify and standardize transfusion practices. The authors of recent studies have advocated a 1:1:1 ratio of packed RBCs to fresh frozen plasma to platelet transfusions in patients requiring MT to avoid dilutional and consumptive coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia, and this has been associated with decreased mortality in recent reports from combat and civilian trauma. Earlier assessment of the exact nature of abnormalities in hemostasis has also been advocated to direct specific component and pharmacologic therapy to restore hemostasis, particularly in the determination of ongoing fibrinolysis.

Massive blood transfusion for trauma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Massive blood transfusion saves the lives of thousands of severely injured patients each year, but it does so in the context of the evolving epidemiology of injury, of trauma centers and trauma systems, and of blood safety and new technologies for hemorrhage control. This article reviews recent knowledge and advances that impact on the use and effectiveness of massive transfusion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Injury is rapidly becoming the second leading cause of death in the world. These deaths are highly preventable with social and engineering controls and good trauma care. Massive transfusion is readily available, safe, effective, and cheap in the context of modern trauma center care. However, aged blood products can cause transfusion-related acute lung injury, and better blood storage systems are under development. Recent work has improved understanding of the coagulopathy associated with acidosis and provided guidance for limiting dilutional coagulopathy. Nevertheless, massive transfusion always leads to coagulopathy and so is at best an adjunct to good surgical care. Better drugs and devices for hemorrhage control, such as recombinant activated factor VII and hemostatic bandages, are in development.

SUMMARY

Injury is a major public health and medical system problem. Progress in basic science, clinical care, and the development of better hemorrhage control devices are all improving outcome for massively transfused patients. Investment in trauma care and supporting blood supply systems is highly cost effective.