Clinical evaluation of Scotchbond: three-year results

Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results

Scotchbond MP and ART Bond were used without intentional enamel etching to bond a total of 43 resin composite restorations in Class V 'abrasion/ erosion' lesions. The cumulative loss rates after 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively, were Scotchbond MP: 9, 14, 27 per cent; and ART Bond: 0, 5, 5 per cent. These data were not compared because each material was used on different patients. The results support the higher bond strength to dentine in the laboratory of Scotchbond MP compared with its predecessor Scotchbond 2. There was a slight but clinically insignificant amount of enamel marginal staining for both products after 2 years, confirming the necessity to etch the enamel for effective marginal sealing.

Restorative therapy for erosive lesions

More needs to be learned about the etiology of erosion lesions before they can be accurately diagnosed, confidently treated and, more importantly, prevented. The treatment is dependent on the location and the degree of erosion. The decision to treat an erosion lesion should be based on careful consideration of the etiology and progression of the condition. Reasons for restoring noncarious enamel/dentin lesions are discussed and various therapeutic measures are provided. Preventive and restorative therapeutic measures for noncarious abrasive/ erosive lesions are proposed such as: a change of dietary or behavior patterns; application of desensitization products; intensive fluoride therapy with or without iontophoresis; brushing with desensitizing dentifrices; adhesive penetration with dentin bonding agents; glass ionomers and compomers; resin composites; composite or porcelain veneers; crown and bridge work; occlusal adjustments and nightguard fabrication if the abfraction factor coincides. The clinical durability of restorative therapy and important clinical factors related to the restoration of multifactorial defects are discussed.

Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems

Laboratory testing of dentin adhesive systems still requires corroboration by long-term clinical trials for their ultimate clinical effectiveness to be validated. The objective of this clinical investigation was to evaluate, retrospectively, the clinical effectiveness of earlier-investigated dentin adhesive systems (Scotchbond, Gluma, Clearfil New Bond, Scotchbond 2, Tenure, and Tripton), and to compare their clinical results with those obtained with four modern total-etch adhesive systems (Bayer exp. 1 and 2, Clearfil Liner Bond System, and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose). In total, 1177 Class V cervical lesions in the teeth of 346 patients were restored following two cavity designs: In Group A, enamel was neither beveled nor intentionally etched, as per ADA guidelines; in Group B, adjacent enamel was beveled and conditioned. Clinical retention rates definitely indicated the improved clinical efficacy of the newest dentin adhesives over the earlier systems. With regard to adhesion strategy, adhesive systems that removed the smear layer and concurrently demineralized the dentin surface layer performed clinically better than systems that modified the disorderly layer of smear debris without complete removal. Hybridization by resin interdiffusion into the exposed dentinal collagen layer, combined with attachment of resin tags into the opened dentin tubules, appeared to be essential for reliable dentin bonding but might be insufficient by itself. The additional formation of an elastic bonding area as a polymerization shrinkage absorber and the use of a microfine restorative composite apparently guaranteed an efficient clinical result. The perfect one-year retention recorded for Clearfil Liner Bond System and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose must be confirmed at later recalls.

Three-year clinical evaluation of Tenure dentine bonding agent

Twenty cervical abrasion lesions in five patients of mean age 58 years were restored with Tenure dentine bonding agent and Silux composite, without enamel etching. The cumulative loss rates of restorations were 5 per cent, 5 per cent, and 11 per cent after 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively, and there was a slight increase of marginal staining. The results are in agreement with other authors.

One-year clinical evaluation of three dentine bonding agents

One hundred and twenty-five composite restorations were placed in non-undercut, non-enamel-etched Class V abrasion lesions in 20 patients using the dentine bonding agents Scotchbond 2, Tripton, and Prisma Universal Bond 2. Patients were recalled at approximately 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. After 1 year the cumulative per cent survival of restorations was Scotchbond 2, 8 per cent; Scotchbond 2 with dentine roughening, 16 per cent; Tripton, 16 per cent; Prisma Universal Bond 2, 75 per cent.

One-year clinical performance of PMDM-based dentine bonding agents

Two PMDM-based dentine bonding agents and a microfilled composite were used to restore a total of forty non-undercut caries-free cervical abrasion lesions without enamel etching. Restorations were evaluated over one year and the loss rate calculated using a life table analysis. Marginal staining was assessed from colour photographs on a continuous linear rating scale. After one year, 5 per cent of Tenure bonded restorations were lost compared with 52 per cent of Mirage bonded restorations. Slight marginal staining was evident around Tenure bonded restorations after one year.

Five-year study of cervical erosions restored with resin and dentin-bonding agent

The cumulative retention rate of a microfilled resin in non-undercut cervical abrasion/erosion lesions was studied over a 5-yr period. The enamel was etched and the dentin was pretreated with either Gluma (n = 75) or the first marketed version of Scotchbond (n = 30). The cumulative 5-yr retention rate of the Gluma fillings was 90% and that of the Scotchbond fillings 47% (the 95% confidence limits were 83-98% for Gluma fillings and 27-67% for Scotchbond fillings). The retention rate with both bonding agents was significantly higher in the maxillary arch than in the mandibular arch.

Dentin bonding systems: a review of current products and techniques

Many dentists are facing decisions regarding selection and use of dentin bonding systems. This article presents information on existing products and provides guidance on their use based on laboratory and clinical evidence.

Release of fluoride from conventional and metal-reinforced glass-ionomer cements

Fluoride was extracted by 1 or 50 ml deionized water from 0.3 ml samples of two conventional and three metal-reinforced glass-ionomer cements. The fluoride concentration was determined by electrode. It was found that the fluoride concentration around the glass-ionomer cements ranged 2-3 ppm after 15 min and 3-5 ppm after 45 min. The maximum fluoride concentration attained within 24 h varied from 15-21 ppm, while the total amount of fluoride released during 100 days varied from about 2 mg fluoride to 12 mg fluoride per ml glass-ionomer cement. An alloy reinforced cement and its conventional counterpart released the highest amount of fluoride whereas a glass-cermet type released the lowest amount. Within the premises of this study it was concluded that composition and handling of the cements are of importance for the release of fluoride, and that a caries inhibitory fluoride concentration can be established in the surroundings of all of the cements.

Clinical performance of dentine bonding agents in the enamel-etched Class V abrasion lesion

Ninety-three non-undercut cervical abrasion lesions were restored with one of five dentine bonding agents and composite resin, using enamel etching to supplement retention. The restorations were reviewed at approximately one, six, 12 and 24 months. The loss rate at one year ranged from zero to 50 per cent, and marginal staining became apparent over the one-year period. It is evident that even with enamel etching, some dentine bonding agents are not effective enough to reliably retain composite in Class V abrasion lesions.

Report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The growth in the dental literature continues to escalate, as evidenced by the publication of at least 326 new books in 1988 and 1989 and more than 20 new journals in 1989. There still appears to be undue emphasis on quantity instead of quality of research. This proliferation in the literature poses ever increasing difficulties to this Committee in filtering out the articles that are of particular interest to the members of the Academy and identifying those that are most likely to have a major impact on dental practice and service. The subjects covered include periodontics, caries and preventive dentistry, craniomandibular disorders, occlusion, pulp biology, ceramics, and restorative dental materials.

Restorations of eroded areas

Class V erosion lesions must be restored to reinstate esthetic appearance, overcome sensitivity, or prevent further loss of tooth structure. Restoration has been a problem, but, with the advent of adhesive techniques, it is far less traumatic. The most widely advocated method currently uses composite resin as the primary restorative material with dentin bonding agents. Type III glass ionomer lining cements are also suggested to provide bonding to the dentin. This paper details the requirements for clinical success in the restoration of the Class V erosion lesion using Type II restorative esthetic glass ionomer cements as the primary restorative material with the possible addition of composite resin as a final veneer only if circumstances warrant it.

Clinical evaluation of three dentine bonding agents

Three commercial dentine bonding agents were used with composite resin to restore non-undercut Class V abrasion lesions without enamel etching. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6 and 12 months and the integrity and marginal staining of restorations was assessed. The loss incidence of restorations ranged from 18 to 40 per cent at one year, and there was increasing evidence of marginal staining over the evaluation period. Comparisons are made with other commercial dentine bonding agents from previous studies in this series.