Effects of splint therapy in TMJ dysfunction: a study using magnetic resonance imaging

Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacement: Etiology, Diagnosis, Imaging, and Therapeutic Approaches

An estimated 8 to 15% of women, and 3 to 10% of men currently suffer from Temporomandibular disorders, and it has been reported that sounds are a common finding and have been observed in 28% to 50% of the adult population; sounds are almost always connected to "internal derangements" a condition in which the articular disk displaced from its position on the mandibular condyle. Due to the multifactorial etiology of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, any accurate diagnosis based on clinical examination alone often proves to be difficult, so a clinical examination should be utilized together with other imaging methods to determine the relationship between the disk and condyle before and after treatment. In general, management of temporomandibular joint-related conditions is necessary when pain or dysfunction is present, so many surgical or nonsurgical methods of treatment have been reported. The Occlusal splint is 1 of the most widespread treatment it induces a slight vertical condylar distraction and eliminates the occlusal factor, which can be responsible for Temporomandibular joint disturbances, removing the influence of the teeth on the joint position by the slight distraction of the joint which, in turn, enables damaged connective tissue to heal.

Joint intracapsular disorders: diagnostic and nonsurgical management considerations

This article reviews common intracapsular temporomandibular disorders encountered in the dental practice. It begins with a brief review of normal temporomandibular joint anatomy and function followed by a description of the common types of disorders known as internal derangements. The etiology, history, and clinical presentation of each are reviewed. Nonsurgical management is presented based on current long-term scientific evidence.

Temporomandibular disorders, head and orofacial pain: cervical spine considerations

Head and orofacial pain originates from dental, neurologic, musculoskeletal, otolaryngologic, vascular, metaplastic, or infectious disease. It is treated by many health care practitioners, such as dentists, oral surgeons, and physicians. The article focuses on the nonpathologic involvement of the musculoskeletal system as a source of head and orofacial pain. The areas of the musculoskeletal system that are reviewed include the temporomandibular joint and muscles of mastication--collectively referred to as temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and cervical spine disorders. The first part of the article highlights the role of physical therapy in the treatment of TMDs. The second part discusses cervical spine considerations in the management of TMDs and head and orofacial symptoms. It concludes with and overview of the evaluation and treatment of the cervical spine.

Diagnosing TMJ internal derangement and osteoarthritis with magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a study to investigate the relationship between the presence of temporomandibular joint, or TMJ, pain and magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, findings of internal derangement, or ID, and arthritis, or OA.

METHODS

The authors studied 131 consecutively seen TMJ pain patients. Their criteria for including a patient in the study were report of unilateral orofacial pain referred to TMJ and the presence of unilateral TMJ pain during palpation, function, and unassisted or assisted mandibular opening. The authors took bilateral sagittal and coronal MRIs to establish the presence or absence of TMJ ID, OA or both.

RESULTS

When the authors compared TMJ side-related data from all subjects, they found a significant relationship between the clinical findings of TMJ pain and the MRI diagnoses of TMJ ID (P = .000) and TMJ OA (P = .013). They also found a significant relationship between the MRI diagnosis of TMJ ID type and that of TMJ OA (P = .000). The authors used the kappa statistical test and found poor diagnostic agreement between the presence of TMJ pain and the MRI diagnosis of TMJ ID (kappa = 0.21), TMJ OA (kappa = 0.15), and TMJ ID and OA combined (kappa = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

The study's findings suggest that while clinical pain is related to TMJ-related MRI findings, the presence of clinical pain is not a reliable predictor of TMJ ID, OA or both.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Using MRI to supplement clinical findings of TMJ pain appears warranted and necessary to establish the presence or absence of TMJ ID.

Effect of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension on the temporomandibular joint disk position

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have suggested arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension as an effective treatment modality in patients demonstrating clinical findings consistent with the diagnosis of disk displacement without reduction, normal range of motion thereby being restored and pain of the temporomandibular joint reduced. In view of the fact that only a few studies have been performed to verify the biologic concept of disk displacement without reduction as a diagnostic and therapeutic approach in patients with "closed-lock" symptoms, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether temporomandibular joint-related variable disk position might be linked to cessation of related signs and symptoms associated with the performance of arthrocentesis and hydraulic distension.

STUDY DESIGN

The study compared 15 patients, each of whom was assigned a clinical unilateral temporomandibular joint-related diagnosis of internal derangement (ID) type III (disk displacement without reduction) in combination with capsulitis/synovitis. Clinical diagnoses were made according to the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Bilateral sagittal and coronal magnetic resonance images were obtained immediately preoperatively and at 2-month follow-up to establish the presence or absence of associated types of ID. Temporomandibular joint-related pain, level of function, and mandibular range of motion were assessed preoperatively and the data were compared with the respective 2-month follow-up findings.

RESULTS

Comparison of the pretreatment temporomandibular joint side-related data revealed the temporomandibular joint side with an ID-III in combination with capsulitis/synovitis to be associated with significantly more magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses of ID than of an absence of ID (P <.001) and with significantly more disk displacement without reduction than disk displacement with reduction (P <.001). At the 2-month follow-up, clinical evaluation showed a significant reduction in temporomandibular joint-related pain during function (P <.001), a significant reduction in the prevalence of temporomandibular joint-related diagnoses of capsulitis/synovitis (P <.001) and ID-III (P <.01), and a significant increase in mandibular range of motion (P <.01). There was no change in the prevalence rates of associated temporomandibular joint side-related IDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the concept of disk displacement as a diagnostic approach but not as a therapeutic approach for patients presenting with signs and symptoms of unilateral ID-III in combination with capsulitis/synovitis. In terms of clinical decision-making in temporomandibular disorder-related instances of ID, magnetic resonance imaging may be used as a diagnostic method for identifying the diagnostic validity of the variable "disk-condyle relationship."

Oral splints: the crutches for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism?

Despite the extensive use of oral splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and bruxism, their mechanisms of action remain controversial Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain their apparent efficacy (i.e., true therapeutic value), including the repositioning of condyle and/or the articular disc, reduction in the electromyographic activity of the masticatory muscles, modification of the patient's "harmful" oral behavior, and changes in the patient's occlusion. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, it is concluded that any of these theories is either poor or inconsistent, while the issue of true efficacy for oral splints remains unsettled. However, the results of a controlled clinical trial lend support to the effectiveness (i.e., the patient's appreciation of the positive changes which are perceived to have occurred during the trial) of the stabilizing splint in the control of myofascial pain. In light of the data supporting their effectiveness but not their efficacy, oral splints should be used as an adjunct for pain management rather than a definitive treatment. For sleep bruxism, it is prudent to limit their use as a habit management aid and to prevent/limit dental damage potentially induced by the disorder. Future research should study the natural history and etiologies of TMD and bruxism, so that specific treatments for these disorders can be developed.

Clinical effect of full coverage occlusal splint therapy for specific temporomandibular disorder conditions and symptoms

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of maxillary full-coverage occlusal splint (stabilization splint) therapy for specific temporomandibular disorders and their symptoms/signs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study assessed the outcome of 232 patients who were suffering from chronic pain on movements, joint noise except reciprocal clicking, and difficulty of mouth opening. All were treated with the stabilization splint alone.

RESULTS

The total remission rate was 41% and, including those reporting some improvement, the rate was 84%. The presence of displaced disk significantly decreased the success rate. However, the presence or absence of radiographic changes in the temporomandibular joint did not influence the treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

From this study, it is suggested that the stabilization splint therapy may be a useful treatment modality in treatment of temporomandibular disorders, especially for the patients without clinical evidence of displaced disk.