1
|
Arain M, Reeb L, Miyagishima RC, Carter J, Novak KL. Primary Care Support Tools for Digestive Health Care: A Mixed Method Study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 2024:6805365. [PMID: 39104577 PMCID: PMC11300069 DOI: 10.1155/2024/6805365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background To address the increasing demands for gastroenterology specialty care and increasing wait times, centralized access and triage (CAT) systems, telephone support, and clinical care pathways were implemented to streamline referrals and support management of low-risk gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in the primary care medical home. This study aimed to understand primary care providers (PCPs) and GI specialists' perceptions of these supports, factors that affect support implementation and identify barriers and facilitators for implementing supports from both PCP and GI specialists' perspectives. Methods We conducted a mixed method study including surveys and interviews with PCPs and GI specialists. Online surveys and semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted from July 2022 to September 2022. All interviews were transcribed and coded to perform a thematic analysis. Survey data were analyzed in SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize and describe the data collected. Inferential statistics were used to identify associations and relationships within the dataset. T-test and chi-square tests were applied at 95% confidence level, with a p value <0.05 (two-sided) considered statistically significant. Results A total of 36 PCPs responded to the survey. Most respondents were working full-time (73.5%, n = 25) and were female (73.5%, n = 25). Overall, 42% used the pathways regularly, 48% (n = 16) used them occasionally, and very few (9.1%, n = 3) said they were aware but had not used pathways. Overall, PCPs were satisfied with CAT processes and the use of primary care pathways, recognizing the importance of fair and equitable access to specialty care. Specific processes in CAT for vulnerable populations and patients using walk-in clinics were recognized as a limitation, given the lack of ease in completing the required testing and follow-up needed when utilizing the care pathway. Of the 112 GI specialists who received the survey, 28 (25%) completed it, with males (50.0%, n = 14) and females (39.2%, n = 11), remainder no response. Most participate in CAT (73.9%, n = 17) and were remunerated by an alternative relationship plan (ARP) (53.6%, n = 15). Overall, GIs were satisfied with central triaging and primary care pathways, reducing unnecessary time and resource expenditure for referrals. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions among fee for service and alternative relationship plan GI specialists regarding the effectiveness of CAT in improving access and use of health system resources. Conclusion Overall, PCPs and GI specialists believe utilizing CAT and primary care pathways improves referral quality, reduces resource expenditure, and provides fair and equitable access to GI specialty services. Improvement in CAT processes with improved pathway awareness may reduce unnecessary referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mubashir Arain
- Health Systems Knowledge & EvaluationAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Leanne Reeb
- Digestive Health Strategic Clinical NetworkAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Julia Carter
- Digestive Health Strategic Clinical NetworkAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kerri L. Novak
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrington J, Rao VN, Leyva M, Oakes M, Mentz RJ, Bosworth HB, Pagidipati NJ. Improving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Review of Implementation Strategies. J Card Fail 2024; 30:376-390. [PMID: 38142886 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent advances in the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), achievement of target GDMT use and up-titration to goal dosages continue to be modest. In recent years, a number of interventional approaches to improve the usage of GDMT have been published, but many are limited by single-center experiences with small sample sizes. However, strategies including the use of multidisciplinary teams, dedicated GDMT titration algorithms and clinician audits with feedback have shown promise. There remains a critical need for large, rigorous trials to assess the utility of differing interventions to improve the use and titration of GDMT in HFrEF. Here, we review existing literature in GDMT implementation for those with HFrEF and discuss future directions and considerations in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Harrington
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
| | - Vishal N Rao
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Monica Leyva
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | - Megan Oakes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | - Robert J Mentz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Hayden B Bosworth
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC
| | - Neha J Pagidipati
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Duke University, Durham, NC; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wendel SK, Bookman K, Holmes M, Wiler JL. Successful Implementation of Workflow-Embedded Clinical Pathways During the COVID 19 Pandemic. Qual Manag Health Care 2023; 32:205-210. [PMID: 36913774 PMCID: PMC10289068 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Clinical pathways have been found effective for improving adherence to evidence-based guidelines, thus providing better patient outcomes. As coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) clinical guidance changed rapidly and evolved, a large hospital system in Colorado established clinical pathways within the electronic health record to guide clinical practice and provide the most up-to-date information to frontline providers. METHODS On March 12, 2020, a system-wide multidisciplinary committee of specialists in emergency medicine, hospital medicine, surgery, intensive care, infectious disease, pharmacy, care management, virtual health, informatics, and primary care was recruited to develop clinical guidelines for COVID-19 patient care based on the limited available evidence and consensus. These guidelines were organized into novel noninterruptive digitally embedded pathways in the electronic health record (Epic Systems, Verona, Wisconsin) and made available to nurses and providers at all sites of care. Pathway utilization data were analyzed from March 14 to December 31, 2020. Retrospective pathway utilization was stratified by each care setting and compared with Colorado hospitalization rates. This project was designated as a quality improvement initiative. RESULTS Nine unique pathways were developed, including emergency medicine, ambulatory, inpatient, and surgical care guidelines. Pathway data were analyzed from March 14 to December 31, 2020, and showed that COVID-19 clinical pathways were used 21 099 times. Eighty-one percent of pathway utilization occurred in the emergency department setting, and 92.4% applied embedded testing recommendations. A total of 3474 distinct providers employed these pathways for patient care. CONCLUSIONS Noninterruptive digitally embedded clinical care pathways were broadly utilized during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic in Colorado and influenced care across many care settings. This clinical guidance was most highly utilized in the emergency department setting. This shows an opportunity to leverage noninterruptive technology at the point of care to guide clinical decision-making and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K. Wendel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Dr Wendel); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (Drs Bookman and Wiler); and Clinical Quality Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora (Ms Holmes and Dr Wiler)
| | - Kelly Bookman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Dr Wendel); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (Drs Bookman and Wiler); and Clinical Quality Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora (Ms Holmes and Dr Wiler)
| | - Molly Holmes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Dr Wendel); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (Drs Bookman and Wiler); and Clinical Quality Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora (Ms Holmes and Dr Wiler)
| | - Jennifer L. Wiler
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Dr Wendel); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora (Drs Bookman and Wiler); and Clinical Quality Department, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora (Ms Holmes and Dr Wiler)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jabbour M, Newton AS, Johnson D, Curran JA. Defining barriers and enablers for clinical pathway implementation in complex clinical settings. Implement Sci 2018; 13:139. [PMID: 30419942 PMCID: PMC6233585 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0832-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While clinical pathways have the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs, their true impact has been limited by variable implementation strategies and suboptimal research designs. This paper explores a comprehensive set of factors perceived by emergency department staff and administrative leads to influence clinical pathway implementation within the complex and dynamic environments of community emergency department settings. METHODS This descriptive, qualitative study involved emergency health professionals and administrators of 15 community hospitals across Ontario, Canada. As part of our larger cluster randomized controlled trial, each site was in the preparation phase to implement one of two clinical pathways: pediatric asthma or pediatric vomiting and diarrhea. Data were collected from three sources: (i) a mediated group discussion with site champions during the project launch meeting; (ii) a semi-structured site visit of each emergency department; and (iii) key informant interviews with an administrative lead from each hospital. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to guide the interviews and thematically analyze the data. Domains within each major theme were then mapped onto the COM-B model-capability, opportunity, and motivation-of the Behaviour Change Wheel. RESULTS Seven discrete themes and 58 subthemes were identified that comprised a set of barriers and enablers relevant to the planned clinical pathway implementation. Within two themes, three distinct levels of impact emerged, namely (i) the individual health professional, (ii) the emergency department team, and (iii) the broader hospital context. The TDF domains occurring most frequently were Memory, Attention and Decision Processes, Environmental Context and Resources, Behavioural Regulation, and Reinforcement. Mapping these barriers and enablers onto the COM-B model provided an organized perspective on how these issues may be interacting. Several factors were viewed as both negative and positive across different perspectives. Two of the seven themes were limited to one component, while four involved all three components of the COM-B model. CONCLUSIONS Using a theory-based approach ensured systematic and comprehensive identification of relevant barriers and enablers to clinical pathway implementation in ED settings. The COM-B system of the Behaviour Change Wheel provided a useful perspective on how these factors might interact to effect change. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01815710 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Jabbour
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Room W1415, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Amanda S Newton
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - David Johnson
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Janet A Curran
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
An Emergency Department Clinical Pathway for Children and Youth with Mental Health Conditions. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2018; 27:413-425. [PMID: 29933791 DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Children and youth presenting to the emergency department with mental health concerns present a challenge for clinicians and system capacity. Addressing a significant system gap and sparse strategies in the literature, representative leaders from hospital and community agencies developed a novel pathway to guide efficient and doable risk assessment and ensure timely transition to appropriate community mental health services. This article describes and reflects on our innovative Emergency Department Clinical Pathway for Children and Youth with Mental Health Conditions that bridges traditional barriers between hospital and community settings to address mental health needs for this population.
Collapse
|
6
|
Shanbhag D, Graham ID, Harlos K, Haynes RB, Gabizon I, Connolly SJ, Van Spall HGC. Effectiveness of implementation interventions in improving physician adherence to guideline recommendations in heart failure: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e017765. [PMID: 29511005 PMCID: PMC5855256 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The uptake of guideline recommendations that improve heart failure (HF) outcomes remains suboptimal. We reviewed implementation interventions that improve physician adherence to these recommendations, and identified contextual factors associated with implementation success. METHODS We searched databases from January 1990 to November 2017 for studies testing interventions to improve uptake of class I HF guidelines. We used the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care and Process Redesign frameworks for data extraction. Primary outcomes included: proportion of eligible patients offered guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy, self-care education, left ventricular function assessment and/or intracardiac devices. We reported clinical outcomes when available. RESULTS We included 38 studies. Provider-level interventions (n=13 studies) included audit and feedback, reminders and education. Organisation-level interventions (n=18) included medical records system changes, multidisciplinary teams, clinical pathways and continuity of care. System-level interventions (n=3) included provider/institutional incentives. Four studies assessed multi-level interventions. We could not perform meta-analyses due to statistical/conceptual heterogeneity. Thirty-two studies reported significant improvements in at least one primary outcome. Clinical pathways, multidisciplinary teams and multifaceted interventions were most consistently successful in increasing physician uptake of guidelines. Among randomised controlled trials (RCT) (n=10), pharmacist and nurse-led interventions improved target dose prescriptions. Eleven studies reported clinical outcomes; significant improvements were reported in three, including a clinical pathway, a multidisciplinary team and a multifaceted intervention. Baseline assessment of barriers, staff training, iterative intervention development, leadership commitment and policy/financial incentives were associated with intervention effectiveness. Most studies (n=20) had medium risk of bias; nine RCTs had low risk of bias. CONCLUSION Our study is limited by the quality and heterogeneity of the primary studies. Clinical pathways, multidisciplinary teams and multifaceted interventions appear to be most consistent in increasing guideline uptake. However, improvements in process outcomes were rarely accompanied by improvements in clinical outcomes. Our work highlights the need for improved research methodology to reliably assess the effectiveness of implementation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepti Shanbhag
- Bachelor of Health Sciences Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Harlos
- Department of Business and Administration, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - R Brian Haynes
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Itzhak Gabizon
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart J Connolly
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harriette Gillian Christine Van Spall
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jabbour M, Reid S, Irwin D, Losier A, Holmgren E, Albrecht D, Rohde K, Moreau K. Clinical pathway-based pediatric emergency outreach program: implementation and preliminary evaluation. Can J Hosp Pharm 2014; 67:240-5. [PMID: 24970945 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.v67i3.1362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Jabbour
- MD, MEd, FRCPC, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Sarah Reid
- MD, FRCPC, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Danica Irwin
- BScPhm, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Andrea Losier
- MD, FRCPC, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Eleanor Holmgren
- RN, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Dennise Albrecht
- BA, MHA, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Kristina Rohde
- MA, CE, is with the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Katherine Moreau
- PhD, is with the University of Ottawa and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jabbour M, Curran J, Scott SD, Guttman A, Rotter T, Ducharme FM, Lougheed MD, McNaughton-Filion ML, Newton A, Shafir M, Paprica A, Klassen T, Taljaard M, Grimshaw J, Johnson DW. Best strategies to implement clinical pathways in an emergency department setting: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2013; 8:55. [PMID: 23692634 PMCID: PMC3674906 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2013] [Accepted: 05/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical pathway is a tool that operationalizes best evidence recommendations and clinical practice guidelines in an accessible format for 'point of care' management by multidisciplinary health teams in hospital settings. While high-quality, expert-developed clinical pathways have many potential benefits, their impact has been limited by variable implementation strategies and suboptimal research designs. Best strategies for implementing pathways into hospital settings remain unknown. This study will seek to develop and comprehensively evaluate best strategies for effective local implementation of externally developed expert clinical pathways. DESIGN/METHODS We will develop a theory-based and knowledge user-informed intervention strategy to implement two pediatric clinical pathways: asthma and gastroenteritis. Using a balanced incomplete block design, we will randomize 16 community emergency departments to receive the intervention for one clinical pathway and serve as control for the alternate clinical pathway, thus conducting two cluster randomized controlled trials to evaluate this implementation intervention. A minimization procedure will be used to randomize sites. Intervention sites will receive a tailored strategy to support full clinical pathway implementation. We will evaluate implementation strategy effectiveness through measurement of relevant process and clinical outcomes. The primary process outcome will be the presence of an appropriately completed clinical pathway on the chart for relevant patients. Primary clinical outcomes for each clinical pathway include the following: Asthma--the proportion of asthmatic patients treated appropriately with corticosteroids in the emergency department and at discharge; and Gastroenteritis--the proportion of relevant patients appropriately treated with oral rehydration therapy. Data sources include chart audits, administrative databases, environmental scans, and qualitative interviews. We will also conduct an overall process evaluation to assess the implementation strategy and an economic analysis to evaluate implementation costs and benefits. DISCUSSION This study will contribute to the body of evidence supporting effective strategies for clinical pathway implementation, and ultimately reducing the research to practice gaps by operationalizing best evidence care recommendations through effective use of clinical pathways. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01815710.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Jabbour
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Janet Curran
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada, School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Astrid Guttman
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Paediatric Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Thomas Rotter
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Francine M Ducharme
- Departments of Pediatrics and of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
- Research Centre, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Canada
| | - M Diane Lougheed
- Departments of Medicine (Respirology), Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (Physiology) and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
- ICES-Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
| | - M Louise McNaughton-Filion
- University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Montfort Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
- Champlain Local Health Integrated Network, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Amanda Newton
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Mark Shafir
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Memorial Hospital, Cambridge, Canada
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Alison Paprica
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Toronto, Canada
| | - Terry Klassen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Manitoba Institute of Child Health, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jeremy Grimshaw
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - David W Johnson
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|