Chiropractic for the prevention and/or treatment of sports injuries: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials

A Comprehensive Summary of Systematic Reviews on Sports Injury Prevention Strategies

Background

A large volume of systematic reviews and meta-analyses has been published on the effectiveness of sports injury prevention programs.

Purpose

To provide a qualitative summary of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have examined the effectiveness of sports injury prevention programs on reducing musculoskeletal injuries.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for systematic reviews and meta-analyses that evaluated the effectiveness of sports injury prevention programs. We excluded published abstracts, narrative reviews, articles not published in English, commentaries, studies that described sports injury prevention strategies but did not assess their effectiveness, studies that did not assess musculoskeletal injuries, and studies that did not assess sports-related injuries. The most relevant results were extracted and summarized. Levels of evidence were determined per the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, and methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, revised version).

Results

A total of 507 articles were retrieved, and 129 were included. Articles pertaining to all injuries were divided into 9 topics: sports and exercise in general (n = 20), soccer (n = 13), ice hockey (n = 1), dance (n = 1), volleyball (n = 1), basketball (n = 1), tackle collision sports (n = 1), climbing (n = 1), and youth athletes (n = 4). Articles on injuries by anatomic site were divided into 11 topics: general knee (n = 8), anterior cruciate ligament (n = 34), ankle (n = 14), hamstring (n = 11), lower extremity (n = 10), foot (n = 6), groin (n = 2), shoulder (n = 1), wrist (n = 2), and elbow (n = 1). Of the 129 studies, 45.7% were ranked as evidence level 1, and 55.0% were evidence level 2. Based on the AMSTAR-2, 58.9% of the reviews reported a priori review methods, 96.1% performed a comprehensive literature search, 47.3% thoroughly described excluded articles, 79.1% assessed risk of bias for individual studies, 48.8% reported a valid method for statistical combination of data (ie, meta-analysis), 45.0% examined the effect of risk of bias on pooled study results, and 19.4% examined the risk for publication bias.

Conclusion

This comprehensive review provides sports medicine providers with a single source of the most up-to-date publications in the literature on sports injury prevention.

Preliminary Feasibility Study to Measure the Immediate Changes of Bilateral Asymmetry After Lumbar Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Asymptomatic Athletes

Objective

The purpose of this preliminary study was to assess the feasibility of a study to measure the immediate changes in bilateral asymmetry on physical performance tests before and after lumbar spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).

Methods

Thirteen asymptomatic athletes participated in this study. Each participant underwent a clinical and physical evaluation for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Assessments were performed in all participants and included a physical test symmetry sequence (static standing position, squat, and countermovement jump) before and after lumbar SMT intervention. The immediate changes were quantitatively measured from before to after intervention by statistical calculations.

Results

All recruited participants completed the study, and none of them reported complaints during participation. Statistically significant differences between before and after lumbar SMT were found only for static symmetry (respectively, mean = 14.4% and 3.7%), not for squatting or the countermovement jump.

Conclusion

According our sample characteristics, asymptomatic athlete participants, presented initially bilateral asymmetry values, such as described in the literature, and after lumbar SMT, these values decreased significantly in static posture. This preliminary study demonstrates the feasibility to measure the pre-to-post changes in symmetry after lumbar SMT intervention. The results showed a great decrease in bilateral symmetry on static symmetry percentage, but none in dynamic tests, which deserves further investigation. Nevertheless, this preliminary study demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the immediate changes in symmetry produced by lumbar SMT, and of a larger study to measure whether lumbar SMT changes symmetry.

Coordination and management of multisite complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies: experience from a multisite reflexology intervention trial

BACKGROUND

Multisite randomized clinical trials allow for increased research collaboration among investigators and expedite data collection efforts. As a result, government funding agencies typically look favorably upon this approach. As the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) continues to evolve, so do increased calls for the use of more rigorous study design and trial methodologies, which can present challenges for investigators.

PURPOSE

To describe the processes involved in the coordination and management of a multisite randomized clinical trial of a CAM intervention.

METHODS

Key aspects related to the coordination and management of a multisite CAM randomized clinical trial are presented, including organizational and site selection considerations, recruitment concerns and issues related to data collection and randomization to treatment groups. Management and monitoring of data, as well as quality assurance procedures are described. Finally, a real world perspective is shared from a recently conducted multisite randomized clinical trial of reflexology for women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer.

RESULTS

The use of multiple sites in the conduct of CAM-based randomized clinical trials can provide an efficient, collaborative and robust approach to study coordination and data collection that maximizes efficiency and ensures the quality of results.

CONCLUSIONS

Multisite randomized clinical trial designs can offer the field of CAM research a more standardized and efficient approach to examine the effectiveness of novel therapies and treatments. Special attention must be given to intervention fidelity, consistent data collection and ensuring data quality. Assessment and reporting of quantitative indicators of data quality should be required.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Thirty years ago, the integration of complementary medicine into cancer care almost was dismissed as quackery. Today, a whole range of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) techniques have been integrated into the management of cancer, which are often of benefit to patients, when conventional treatment is deemed to have failed or caused intolerable side effects. Health care workers need to inquire about the use of CAM in their patients routinely in a sensitive and nonjudgmental way, and may need to advise patients to stop certain therapies. Yet in advanced cancer, a sensible balance needs to be struck between fear about adverse effects and interactions and the importance of making the remaining weeks/days/months as comfortable and enjoyable as possible.