Patients' narratives of their patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway

Prehospital emergency nurses' experiences of caring for patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: an interview study

OBJECTIVE

Despite the prevalence of emergency medical service assignments related to chest discomfort, limited research delves into nurses' experiences of caring for such patients. This study aimed to illuminate prehospital emergency nurses' (PENs') experiences of caring for patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

DESIGN

A qualitative interview study.

SETTING

Two Swedish emergency medical service organisations in two different regions.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive inclusion of 12 PENs.

DATA ANALYSIS

An inductive content analysis according to Elo and Kyngäs.

RESULTS

The results underline the active role of PENs in providing care for patients with AMI in the emergency medical service. They emphasise the ability to identify classic symptoms and the need for an open-minded approach to diffuse presentations. Ensuring patient security, projecting knowledge and composure are decisive for instilling a sense of safety. Healthcare providers feel profound responsibility and a fear of errors, especially in critical situations with potential patient deterioration. Prioritisation in time-sensitive cases leans towards medical interventions and immediate transportation. Continuing education is essential to enhance patient management and safety. Effective communication and trust are vital for urgent patient care, and prompt activation of the ST-elevation myocardial infarction pathway is recognised as imperative. Malfunctions result in frustration, underlining the importance of pathway functionality.

CONCLUSIONS

PENs have immense responsibility for the swift and knowledgeable management of patients with suspected AMI. Balancing patient involvement and urgent medical measures is challenging, emphasising the critical role of mental preparedness and comprehensive education. The study underlines the significance of effective communication and trust between healthcare providers, particularly in time-sensitive scenarios. Establishing feedback mechanisms for prehospital staff is important for advancing prehospital emergency care in this patient category.

Experiences and challenges of acute coronary syndrome patients in care provision: a qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease including acute coronary syndrome (ACS) constitutes the most common cause of death in people with cardiovascular disease. Prompt diagnosis and early initiation of treatment significantly impact on patient outcomes. Positive patient experience with their initial care is linked to positive clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative review aimed to investigate patients' experience of care provision and the challenges faced by them during their different stages of care following an ACS.

METHODS

Searches of four databases - MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO - were conducted from inception until July 13, 2022, and were limited to English-language publications. Assessment of methodological quality of studies was performed using the Jonna Briggs Institute (JBI) qualitative assessment and review instrument. Data were extracted using the standardised data extraction tool from JBI. Data synthesis following the JBI approach of meta-aggregation was performed. The level of confidence for each synthesised finding was established based on ConQual.

RESULTS

Overall, from 578 records, 10 studies were included with 39 findings extracted from the included studies. The main synthesised findings were the need to provide tailored information and appropriate management at different stages of care, and that timely management and trust in health care workers are associated with greater patient satisfaction and more positive experiences.

CONCLUSION

Patients with an ACS experience many challenges during different stages of their care. Clinicians should be aware of the challenges they face and provide tailored information to patients that is appropriate for their different stages of management in order to best optimise patient experience and improve patient outcomes.

Physicians' narratives of communication with patients and their relatives in different phases of the palliative pathway

OBJECTIVES

To explore physicians' experiences of the communication with patients and their relatives in the different phases of the palliative pathway.

METHODS

Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit a total of 13 oncologists and general practitioners who engaged in palliative care. A qualitative study with a narrative approach was conducted. Interviews with physicians working in primary and specialist healthcare were conducted via Skype Business in the spring of 2020. The interview guide had open-ended questions with each interview lasting between 35 and 60 min.

RESULTS

Communication between the physicians, their patients and their relatives was contextual and changed depending on the phase in the palliative pathway. In the first phase, physicians told us that patients and their relatives experienced an emotional shock. Transitioning from the curative to palliative phase was difficult, which emphasised the need for trust through communication. In the middle phase, they revealed that communication about the death process became the priority: what was probably going to happen, the family's role in what was going to happen and perhaps, depending on the illness, any medical decisions that needed to be made. It was important for the physicians to communicate information about the palliative pathway while providing the relatives with knowledge that facilitated any decision making. In the terminal phase, physicians employed a compassionate approach, as bereaved family members needed to process their feelings of guilt and grief.

CONCLUSIONS

The study gives new insight into communication with patients and their relatives during different phases of the palliative pathway, from the physician's perspective. The findings may help physicians improve the quality of communication with patients and their relatives over these vulnerable pathways. The findings also have practical implications in training contexts. The study reveals ethical dilemmas in physicians' communication with patients and their relatives during a palliative pathway.

PHYSICAL EXERCISE ON THE RECOVERY OF OBESITY MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

ABSTRACT Introduction: Myocardial infarction caused by human obesity can cause a decline in mobility and a decline in the quality of a healthy life. Sports training is beneficial to maintain early physical functions after myocardial infarction. Objective: This article deals with the effect of applying walking aerobic exercise in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with myocardial infarction. Methods: We enrolled 91 patients with myocardial infarction in the early exercise group and 90 patients in the control group. The control group received the routine nursing intervention, and the early exercise group received early physical exercise rehabilitation therapy. Results: The actual quality of life of the early exercise group was higher than that of the control group. The incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was lower than that of the control group. Conclusion: Physical exercise therapy used in acute myocardial infarction can reduce adverse cardiovascular events and improve the quality of life of patients. Level of evidence II; Therapeutic studies - investigation of treatment results.

Nurses' perceptions of patient participation in the myocardial infarction pathway

Aim

To explore nurses' perceptions of patient participation in different phases of the myocardial infarction pathway.

Design

Qualitative design with a hermeneutical approach.

Methods

Five focus groups were conducted at two hospitals, one with and one without percutaneous coronary intervention facilities, between February-November 2018. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling. Twenty-two nurses experienced in cardiac care participated. The analysis had a hermeneutical approach.

Results

The findings revealed nurses' perceptions of patient participation in different phases of the myocardial infarction pathway. Four themes were identified: (a) variation between paternalism and autonomy in the acute phase; (b) individualization of dialogue and patient participation during treatment; (c) lack of coherence in the pathway hinders patient participation at discharge; and (d) cardiac rehabilitation promotes patients' autonomous decisions in lifestyle changes.

Continuity of care and its associations with self-reported health, clinical characteristics and follow-up services after percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

Complexity of care in patients with coronary artery disease is increasing, due to ageing, improved treatment, and more specialised care. Patients receive care from various healthcare providers in many settings. Still, few studies have evaluated continuity of care across primary and secondary care levels for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to determine multifaceted aspects of continuity of care and associations with socio-demographic characteristics, self-reported health, clinical characteristics and follow-up services for patients after PCI.

METHODS

This multi-centre prospective cohort study collected data at baseline and two-month follow-up from medical records, national registries and patient self-reports. Univariable and hierarchical regressions were performed using the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire total score as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

In total, 1695 patients were included at baseline, and 1318 (78%) completed the two-month follow-up. Patients stated not being adequately informed about lifestyle changes, medication and follow-up care. Those experiencing poorer health status after PCI scored significantly worse on continuity of care. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scored significantly better on informational and management continuity than those with other cardiac diagnoses. The regression analyses showed significantly better continuity (P ≤ 0.034) in patients who were male, received written information from hospital, were transferred to another hospital before discharge, received follow-up from their general practitioner or had sufficient consultation time after discharge from hospital.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for sub-optimal continuity were identified. These factors are important to patients, healthcare providers and policy makers. Action should be taken to educate patients, reconcile discharge plans and organise post-discharge services. Designing pathways with an interdisciplinary approach and shared responsibility between healthcare settings is recommended.