Fear of older adult falling questionnaire for caregivers (FOAFQ-CG): Evidence from content validity and item-response theory graded-response modelling

Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research

BACKGROUND

In recent years, patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has significantly increased; however, the reporting of PPI remains poor. The Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) was developed to enhance the quality and consistency of PPI reporting. The objective of this systematic review is to identify the frequency and quality of PPI reporting in patient safety (PS) research using the GRIPP2 checklist.

METHODS

Searches were performed in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from 2018 to December, 2023. Studies on PPI in PS research were included. We included empirical qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, and case studies. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals in English were included. The quality of PPI reporting was assessed using the short form of the (GRIPP2-SF) checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 8561 studies were retrieved from database searches, updates, and reference checks, of which 82 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Major PS topics were related to medication safety, general PS, and fall prevention. Patient representatives, advocates, patient advisory groups, patients, service users, and health consumers were the most involved. The main involvement across the studies was in commenting on or developing research materials. Only 6.1% (n = 5) of the studies reported PPI as per the GRIPP2 checklist. Regarding the quality of reporting following the GRIPP2-SF criteria, our findings show sub-optimal reporting mainly due to failures in: critically reflecting on PPI in the study; reporting the aim of PPI in the study; and reporting the extent to which PPI influenced the study overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review shows a low frequency of PPI reporting in PS research using the GRIPP2 checklist. Furthermore, it reveals a sub-optimal quality in PPI reporting following GRIPP2-SF items. Researchers, funders, publishers, and journals need to promote consistent and transparent PPI reporting following internationally developed reporting guidelines such as the GRIPP2. Evidence-based guidelines for reporting PPI should be encouraged and supported as it helps future researchers to plan and report PPI more effectively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023450715).

Caregivers' fear of older care recipients falling: A systematic review of qualitative studies

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative systematic review aimed to describe informal caregivers' and health personnel's experiences of the FOF (fear of falling) of older adults under their care.

METHODS

A systematic search of databases included not only the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library but also the Chinese databases of CNKI, WanFang, and Vip. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

In total, 17 studies were included in the systematic evaluation. Four themes were identified, and an evidence model was developed that includes multiple attributions of FOF, management strategies for fall prevention, dynamic challenges and adaptation, and external support and unmet needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The fear of falling felt by informal caregivers and health personnel is mainly affected by internal factors in older adults, and harms the health of older adults through overprotective behavior. Thus, there is an urgent need of external support to improve the quality of life and promote the healthy aging of older adults.

"Being careful": How much caution is enough? The relational context of fear of older adult falling in older adult-family caregiver dyads

Family caregivers play an important role in coping with older adult falls; however, their perspectives on fear of older adult falling are lacking from the falls prevention literature. A mixed-method design (N=25 dyads) with interview and survey data examined linguistic characteristics and coping strategies used by older adult and family caregiver dyads to manage fear of older adult falling. Fear of older adult falling consisted of both affective (e.g., worry) and cognitive (e.g., cautious) properties. Family caregivers more frequently used affective words and first-person plural pronouns ("we" language) when talking about fear of older adult falling, while older adults more frequently used cognitive and first-and-second person singular pronouns ("I", "you"). The concept of "being careful" was shared within dyads. However, dyad partners differed in their perspectives of what constituted "being careful" and the possibilities of future falling. Findings suggest that the need for family-centered interventions to prevent falls are needed.

The effect that the Otago Exercise Programme had on fear of falling in community dwellers aged 65-80 and associated factors

BACKGROUND

Falls are a major public health problem. Fear of falling is highly prevalent amongst community-dwelling older adults who have already fallen and it is also a risk factor for recurrent falls. There has been limited research about the impact that exercises programs have on the fear of falling. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the Otago Exercise Programme (OEP) reduced the fear of falling in non-institutionalised people aged 65-80 years in Spain. It also evaluated the factors associated with the fear of falling.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental study that focused on people aged 65-80 who attended 21 primary healthcare centres, lived in the community, were able to walk independently and provided written, informed consent. They were recruited from September 2017 to December 2019. The OEP sessions took place at the primary healthcare centres and were provided on an individual or group basis by trained OEP instructors. The participants attended five weekly sessions, where they were given exercises to develop their strength, balance and endurance. They then continued the programme at home. The subjects were followed up 12 months after baseline and the analyses included a bivariate analysis and a multivariate analysis with logistic regression.

RESULTS

We enroled 498 patients (67.07% female) with an average age of 71.81 years. More than two-thirds (65.06%) lived with a partner and 42.37% were overweight. Significant reductions were observed in the mean level of fear of falling between baseline and 12 months (p = 0.000). A number of factors associated with fear of falling also showed significant differences. These were: age (p = 0.033), sex (p = 0.000), living alone (p = 0.000), body mass index (p = 0.003) and whether psychotropic drugs were used (p = 0.000). The multivariate analysis showed a moderate to high fear of falling amongst participants who were female (p = 0.000), 72-80 years of age (p = 0.017), obese (p = 0.045) and used psychotropic drugs (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Taking part in the OEP reduced the overall fear of falling. There were significant associations between fear of falling and being female, taking psychotic drugs and having a history of falls. This study is a quasi-experimental sign nested an experimental study (randomized controlled trial previously published and registered on ClinicalTrials.org (NCT03320668)). Retrospectively registered on 25/10/2017.

Optimal Examination Sites for Periodontal Disease Evaluation: Applying the Item Response Theory Graded Response Model

Periodontal examination data have a complex structure. For epidemiological studies, mass screenings, and public health use, a simple index that represents the periodontal condition is necessary. Periodontal indices for partial examination of selected teeth have been developed. However, the selected teeth vary between indices, and a justification for the selection of examination teeth has not been presented. We applied a graded response model based on the item response theory to select optimal examination teeth and sites that represent periodontal conditions. Data were obtained from 254 patients who participated in a multicenter follow-up study. Baseline data were obtained from initial follow-up. Optimal examination sites were selected using item information calculated by graded response modeling. Twelve sites—maxillary 2nd premolar (palatal-medial), 1st premolar (palatal-distal), canine (palatal-medial), lateral incisor (palatal-central), central incisor (palatal-distal) and mandibular 1st premolar (lingual, medial)—were selected. Mean values for clinical attachment level, probing pocket depth, and bleeding on probing by full mouth examinations were used for objective variables. Measuring the clinical parameters of these sites can predict the results of full mouth examination. For calculating the periodontal index by partial oral examination, a justification for the selection of examination sites is essential. This study presents an evidence-based partial examination methodology and its modeling.