A self-management support intervention on knee functional status and health-related quality of life among middle-age women: A randomized controlled trial

Core contents for a menopausal health literacy intervention for South Korean middle-aged women: an e-Delphi study

BACKGROUND

The attention on improving health literacy (HL) for self-management at the population level in many countries has been increasing. Although self-management among middle-aged women in the menopausal transition are important public health issues, few studies have developed the menopausal HL intervention reflecting the multidimensional aspects of HL. We aimed to generate consensus from an expert panel on the core contents of the menopausal HL intervention for middle-aged women based on the HL conceptual framework of the European Health Literacy Survey.

METHODS

The panel comprised 20 experts from multiple disciplines (nursing, medicine, public health, and food and nutrition). We conducted the e-Delphi process in three rounds, asking the panel to evaluate and prioritize the appropriateness of the core contents and provide open-ended responses to additional comments about the menopausal HL intervention. The e-Delphi questionnaire was developed based on the HL framework, integrating health and HL domains.

RESULTS

The experts reached a consensus on 38 components of the intervention. Among the 19 components of the four health domains, health topics in healthcare and disease prevention were more appropriate than those in health promotion. For the 19 HL competency components, strengthening the ability to access, appraise, and apply health information was more important than strengthening the ability to understand information. Finally, a consensus was achieved on the 12 priorities for intervention content by HL domains integrated with health domains. For example, contents included proper access to reliable information resources, understanding the definition and process of menopause, judging abnormal health symptoms, and performing the health checkups necessary for menopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide evidence for HL skills that nurses and other health professionals can consider when developing interventions to improve self-management among middle-aged women. Future research should focus on incorporating the core contents of multidimensional HL skills into menopausal HL interventions to improve self-management among middle-aged women.

Association between health literacy and self-management among middle-aged women: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to review and synthesize the literature on the association between health literacy (HL) and self-management in middle-aged women aged 35-64 years and examine the definitions and measurements of HL.

METHODS

Eleven electronic databases were used for searching specific terms. Experimental and non-experimental studies in English or Korean were included based on the eligibility criteria. Two authors independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment.

RESULTS

One experimental and 13 non-experimental studies were included. Of the 11 studies that defined HL, nine conceptualized it as reflecting multidimensional HL. Four studies measured HL capturing all dimensions of the concept (i.e., accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying) and two studies used context-specific HL measurements. Women with greater HL challenges generally had lower self-management context, process, and outcomes across the health continuum.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancing HL is a critical strategy for improving self-management in middle-aged women. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of HL interventions on self-management considering multidimensional definitions and measures of HL.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Health professionals should be alert to middle-aged women's HL and implement HL interventions that provide them with opportunities to access, understand, analyze, and utilize health-related information to effectively improve HL and engage in self-management.

Creating a Self-management Mobile Application for People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Focus Group Study of Unmet Needs and Strategies

Mobile health can fulfill the unmet needs of patients with chronic low back pain by recommending individualized management plans. Limited mobile applications have been developed based on the needs, preferences, and values relative to self-management of patients with chronic low back pain. This study aimed to explore the experience of patients with chronic low back pain and the desired content, designs, and features of a self-management application. We conducted five focus groups (N = 24). Participants provided feedback on draft contents and they also discussed the desired designs and features of an application while reviewing a low-fidelity prototype. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Three categories and eight subcategories emerged. Participants: (1) confronted difficulties of their pain experience along with vicious cycles of pain and unmet needs; (2) acknowledged the importance of self-management as they lived with chronic low back pain and realized how to self-manage their pain; and (3) suggested ways to fulfill needs and preferences among patients with chronic low back pain. The nature of chronic low back pain causes disruptions well-being and requires constant management. Developing user-centered strategies to enhance knowledge and promote self-management among chronic low back pain patients is required.

Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a high incidence chronic joint disease that seriously affects patients' quality of life, and current treatment methods have limited efficacy. Self-management may be an effective strategy for KOA, and clinicians have been showing increased interest recently. However, the effectiveness of self-management for KOA remains controversial.

Purpose

This study aims to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of self-management for KOA.

Methods

We screened articles published in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science until September 17, 2021. The main outcomes included pain, knee function, stiffness, WOMAC (total), physical function, arthritis self-efficacy (ASE-pain), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE-other symptoms), mental health, and quality of life.

Results

Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included (n = 1610). Meta-analysis showed differences in pain, knee function, stiffness, ASE-pain, ASE-other symptoms, mental health, and quality of life between the self-management and control groups. Of the nine outcomes evaluated, four were highly heterogeneous, and the quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis results showed that self-management might help improve the pain, knee function, stiffness, ASE, mental health, and quality of life in patients with KOA. However, it has no significant effect on WOMAC (total) and physical function. Considering that this study has some limitations, we cannot draw clear conclusions based on the results of this study. Nevertheless, we offer much needed insight and encourage more rigorously designed and implemented RCTs in the future to substantiate our conclusions.