A quantitative evaluation of a regional Positive Behavioural Support workforce development approach

Positive behaviour supports in disability and community services (PBS-DCS): a tiered model for foundational, targeted, and specialist supports

PURPOSE

Positive behaviour support (PBS) is recommended as a service response to challenging behaviours. In Australia, however, there has been concern regarding PBS policy and implementation. In response, this article proposes a tiered PBS service model for disability and community settings, which is evidence-based and rights-driven.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant literature, policy guidelines, and clinical experience are used to inform a positive behaviour support service model for community implementation.

RESULTS

The Positive Behaviour Support in Disability and Community Service (PBS-DCS) model articulates systems-wide practices that support effective PBS provision within a human rights approach. The model describes three tiers of behaviour support: Tier I (Foundational), Tier II (Targeted), and Tier III (Specialist), and considers who should deliver which intervention elements and when.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBS-DCS model provides a framework to support quality PBS practice in community settings. It is proposed that a proof-of-concept model of community-based PBS should be investigated-and that this would help to ensure current practice aligns with the professional expectations of PBS and deliver high quality services to people living with disability.

Burnout and secondary traumatic stress in staff working with people with intellectual disabilities: The role of adverse childhood experiences, resilience and trauma-informed organisational climate

BACKGROUND

There has been extensive research into adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), however, less consideration has been given to the prevalence and impact of ACEs for staff working with people with intellectual disabilities.

METHOD

Participants were staff employed by agencies that care for people with intellectual disabilities. An online survey collected demographic information and measures of ACEs, resilience, trauma-informed organisational climate, burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Correlation, regression, mediation and moderation analyses were used.

RESULTS

81.7% of 109 participants had experienced at least one ACE. Burnout, secondary traumatic stress and resilience were greater in the present study than in comparable samples. Trauma-informed organisational climate significantly predicted burnout and secondary traumatic stress. Resilience significantly predicted burnout.

CONCLUSIONS

Staff working with people with intellectual disabilities are likely to have experienced ACEs. Working in a trauma-informed organisational climate and resilience may be effective avenues for reducing burnout and secondary traumatic stress.