Feed and reproductive efficiency differences between divergently selected lines for birthweight environmental variability in mice

Differential sensitivity of climate conditions on birth weight genetic values in mice divergently selected for birth weight residual variance

After 32 generations of a divergent selection experiment for residual variance of birth weight in mice, two divergent lines were thus obtained: the heterogeneous line (H-line) and the homogeneous line (L-line). Throughout the generations, differences were observed between the two lines in traits such as litter size, survival at weaning, and birth weight variability caused by unidentified environmental conditions. The L-line exhibited advantages in terms of higher survival rates, larger litter sizes, and less sensitivity to changes in food intake. The study is an examination of the effects of climate as an environmental factor on the performance of these animals. Climate factors including maximum, minimum, and mean temperature (T), humidity (H), and TH index; at three stages (the fecundation, a week before the parturition and the parturition), were linked to a birth weight dataset consisting of 22,614 records distributed as follows: 8,853 corresponding to the H-line, 12,649 to the L-line, and 1,112 to the initial population. Out of the 27 analyzed climatic variables, the maximum temperature 1 wk before parturition (MXTW) was identified as the most influential when comparing heteroscedastic models with the deviance information criterion. The order of Legendre polynomial to apply in the following random regression model was tested by a cross-validation using homoscedastic models. Finally, MXTW was compared on how it affected the two divergent lines by analyzing predicted breeding values (PBV) obtained from a random regression heteroscedastic model. The mean PBV of the H-line in the first generation showed a range of 0.070 g with a negative slope, which was 35 times higher than the range obtained for the L-line, which varied within 0.002 g. In the last generation of selection, the H-line exhibited greater instability of PBV across temperatures, with a difference of 0.101 g between the maximum and minimum mean PBV, compared to 0.017 g for the L-line. The standard deviations of the slopes in the H-line were more dispersed than in the L-line. Unlike the H-line, the L-line had slopes that were not significantly different from 0 throughout the generations of selection, indicating greater stability in response to MXTW variations. The H-line exhibited a higher sensitivity to changes in MXTW, particularly in birth weight, with the L-line being more stable. The selection for uniformity of birth weight could lead to less sensitive animals under environmental changes.

Impact of selection for birth weight variability on reproductive longevity: A mice model

Uniformity, understood as a similar performance in relevant livestock traits, such as birth weight within the litter, is being included as one of the selection objectives in breeding programmes, especially for polytocous livestock species. A divergent selection experiment for birth weight within‐litter variability in mice during 23 generations showed that homogeneous animals were better for litter size, survival and feed efficiency but less heavy than heterogeneous animals. The aim of this study was to compare the reproductive longevity in both divergent lines as time to the end of the reproductive period. Two generations from both lines with an initial number of 43 females and 43 males were mated one to one and stayed together to have consecutive parturitions until the end of the reproductive life. Females were discarded when the time elapsed from the last parturition was longer than 63 days. The time to the end of the reproductive period between both lines was compared by fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusting for line, generation and its interaction. The rate of parturitions in both lines was also compared using a Prentice–Williams–Peterson model adjusted for the same effects. The low variability line was associated with a higher parturition rate, e.g., adjusted hazard ratio was 2.93 (95% CI 2.17–3.94). The Cox model showed that the low variability females also presented benefits of time to the end of the reproductive period, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.26 (95% CI 0.16–0.41). The median of reproductive days was 55.50 in the high variability line whilst the median was 252.50 days for the low variability females. The homogeneous line presented important reproductive advantages suggesting higher robustness and animal welfare. Further research should confirm whether the findings presented here of a better performance in the low variability line could be properly applied to some livestock species.

Genetics and genomics of uniformity and resilience in livestock and aquaculture species: A review

Genetic control of residual variance offers opportunities to increase uniformity and resilience of livestock and aquaculture species. Improving uniformity and resilience of animals will improve health and welfare of animals and lead to more homogenous products. Our aims in this review were to summarize the current models and methods to study genetic control of residual variance, genetic parameters and genomic results for residual variance and discuss future research directions. Typically, the genetic coefficient of variation is high (median = 0.27; range 0-0.86) and the heritability of residual variance is low (median = 0.01; range 0-0.10). Higher heritabilities can be achieved when increasing the number of records per animal. Divergent selection experiments have supported the feasibility of selecting for high or low residual variance. Genomic studies have revealed associations in regions related to stress, including those from the heat shock protein family. Although the number of studies is growing, genetic control of residual variance is still poorly understood, but big data and genomics offer great opportunities.

The Statistical Scale Effect as a Source of Positive Genetic Correlation Between Mean and Variability: A Simulation Study

The selection objective for animal production is the highest income with the lowest production cost, while ensuring the highest animal welfare. A selection experiment for environmental variability of birth weight in mice showed a correlated response in the mean after 20 generations starting from a crossed panmictic population. The relationship between the birth weight and its environmental variability explained the correlated response. The scale effect represents a potential cause of this correlation. The relationship between the mean and the variability implies: the higher the mean, the higher the variability. The study was to quantify by simulation the genetic correlation between a trait and its environmental variability. This can be attributable to the scale effect in a range of coefficients of variation and heritabilities between 0.05 and 0.50. The resulting genetic correlation ranged from 0.1335 to 0.7021 being the highest for the highest heritability and the lowest CV. The scale effect for a trait with heritability between 0.25 and 0.35 and CV between 0.15 and 0.25 generated a genetic correlation between 0.43 and 0.57. The genetic coefficient of variation (GCV) affecting residual variability was modulated by the strength reducing the impact of the scale effect. GCV ranged from 0.0050 to 1.4984. The strength of the scale effect might be in the range between 0 and 1. The scale effect would explain many reported genetic correlation and the additive genetic variance for the variability. This is relevant when increasing the mean of a trait jointly with the reduction of its variability.

Effect of feed restriction on the environmental variability of birth weight in divergently selected lines of mice

BACKGROUND

Selection of mice for decreased environmental variability of birth weight has achieved higher survivability and larger litter size as a correlated response to canalized selection, which suggests higher welfare and robustness, and animals that are more homogeneous. However, in these studies, animals were not exposed to an environmental challenge. To demonstrate the advantages of this mouse line with a low environmental variability of birth weight, animals from two divergent lines (high and low variability of birth weight) were subjected to feed restriction. The objective of this study was to use these divergent lines to compare their response in terms of robustness against an environmental challenge. At weaning, 120 females, i.e. four full-sib females from 10 random litters of three consecutive generations of selection, were chosen from these divergent lines. The total number of females was divided into four groups, which were subjected to a feeding regimen by imposing different levels of feed restriction (i.e. 75, 90 and 85% of full ad libitum feed across three generations, respectively) in different combinations during the growth and reproduction periods.

RESULTS

Animals from the "low" line were less sensitive to a change in feed level than those from the "high" line. Regarding reproduction, the "low" line performed better in terms of number of females having parturitions, number of parturitions, and litter size. Imposing a feed restriction on female mice during their growth period did not affect the birth weight of their pups. The "low" line was preferred because of its higher reproductive efficiency and survival under an environmental challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection for decreased environmental variability of birth weight produces animals that are less sensitive to environmental conditions, which can be interpreted as having greater robustness.