Including genotypic information in genetic evaluations increases the accuracy of sheep breeding values

Including genomic information in the genetic evaluation of production and reproduction traits in South African Merino sheep

Genomic selection (GS) has become common in sheep breeding programmes in Australia, New Zealand, France and Ireland but requires validation in South Africa (SA). This study aimed to compare the predictive ability, bias and dispersion of pedigree BLUP (ABLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for production and reproduction traits in South African Merinos. Animals in this study originated from five research and five commercial Merino flocks and included between 54,072 and 79,100 production records for weaning weight (WW), yearling weight (YW), fibre diameter (FD), clean fleece weight (CFW) and staple length (SL). For reproduction traits, the dataset included 58,744 repeated records from 17,268 ewes for the number of lambs born (NLB), number of lambs weaned (NLW) and the total weight weaned (TWW). The single-step relationship matrix, H, was calculated using PreGS90 software combining 2811 animals with medium density (~50 K) genotypes and the pedigree of 88,600 animals. Assessment was based on single-trait analysis using ASREML V4.2 software. The accuracy of prediction was evaluated according to the 'LR-method' by a cross-validation design. Validation candidates were assigned according to Scenario I: born after a certain time point; and Scenario II: born in a particular flock. In Scenario I, the genotyping rate for the reference population between 2006 and the 2013 cut-off point approached 7% of animals with phenotypes and 20% of their sires. For reproduction traits, about 20% of ewes born between 2006 and 2011 cut-off were genotyped, along with 15% of their sires. Genotyping rates in the validation set of Scenario I were 3.7% (production) and 11.4% (reproduction) for candidates and 35% of their sires. Sires were allowed to have progeny in both the reference and validation set. In Scenario I, ssGBLUP increased the accuracy of prediction for all traits except NLB, ranging between +8% (0.62-0.67) for FD and +44% (0.36-0.52) for WW. This showed a promising gain in accuracy despite a modestly sized reference population. In the 'across flock validation' (Scenario II), overall accuracy was lower, but with greater differences between ABLUP and ssGBLUP ranging between +17% (0.12-0.14) for TWW and +117% (0.18-0.39) for WW. There was little indication of severe bias, but some traits were prone to over dispersion and the use of genomic information did not improve this. These results were the first to validate the benefit of genomic information in South African Merinos. However, because production traits are moderately heritable and easy to measure at an early age, future research should be aimed at best exploiting GS methods towards genetic prediction of sex-limited and/or lowly heritable traits such as NLW. GS methods should be combined with dedicated efforts to increase genetic links between sectors and improved phenotyping by commercial flocks.

Incorporating the pedigree information in multi-environment trial analyses for improving common vetch

Common vetch is one of the most profitable forage legumes due to its versatility in end-use which includes grain, hay, green manure, and silage. Furthermore, common vetch is one of the best crops to rotate with cereals as it can increase soil fertility which results in higher yield in cereal crops. The National Vetch Breeding Program located in South Australia is focused on developing new vetch varieties with higher grain and dry matter yields, better resistance to major diseases, and wider adaptability to Australian cropping environments. As part of this program, a study was conducted with 35 field trials from 2015 to 2021 in South Australia, Western Australia, Victoria, and New South Wales with the objective of determining the best parents for future crosses and the vetch lines with highest commercial value in terms of grain yield production. A total of 392 varieties were evaluated. The individual field trials were combined in a multi-environment trial data, where each trial is identified as an environment. Multiplicative mixed models were used to analyze the data and a factor analytic approach to model the genetic by environment interaction effects. The pedigree of the lines was then assembled and incorporated into the analysis. This approach allowed to partition the total effects into additive and non-additive components. The total and additive genetic effects were inspected across and within environments for broad and specific selections of the lines with the best commercial value and the best parents. Summary measures of overall performance and stability were used to aid with selection of parents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study which used the pedigree information to breed common vetch. In this paper, the application of this statistical methodology has been successfully implemented with the inclusion of the pedigree improving the fit of the models to the data with most of the total genetic variation explained by the additive heritable component. The results of this study have shown the importance of including the pedigree information for common vetch breeding programs and have improved the ability of breeders to select superior commercial lines and parents.