Adenosine-Guided Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Study

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in Korea: results from the Korean Heart Rhythm Society Ablation Registry for Atrial Fibrillation (KARA)

Background

This study aims to investigate the current status of AF (atrial fibrillation) catheter ablation in Korea.

Methods

The patients who underwent AF catheter ablation from September 2017 to December 2019 were prospectively enrolled from 37 arrhythmia centers. Demographic data, procedural characteristics, the extent of catheter ablation, acute success of the ablation lesion set, rate and independent risk factor for recurrence of AF were analyzed.

Results

A total of 2402 AF patients [paroxysmal AF (PAF) 45.7%, persistent AF (PeAF) 43.1% and redo AF 11.2%] were included. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 2378 patients (99%) and acute success rate was 97.9%. Additional non-PV ablation (NPVA) were performed in 1648 patients (68.6%). Post-procedural complication rate was 2.2%. One-year AF-free survival rate was 78.6% and the PeAF patients showed poorer survival rate than the ones with other types (PeAF 72.4%, PAF 84.2%, redo AF 80.0%). Additional NPVA did not influence the recurrence of AF in the PAF patients (PVI 17.0% vs. NPVA 14.6%, P value 0.302). However, it showed lower AF recurrence rate in the PeAF patients (PVI 34.9% vs. NPVA 24.4%, P value 0.001). Valvular heart disease, left atrial diameter, PeAF, PVI alone, need of NPVA for terminating AF, and failed ablation were independent predictors of AF recurrence.

Conclusions

Additional NPVA was associated better rhythm outcome in the patients with PeAF, not in the ones with PAF. The independent risk factors for AF recurrence in Korean population were similar to previous studies. Further research is needed to discover optimal AF ablation strategy.

Long-term outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation with and without pulmonary vein dormant conduction after adenosine challenge

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic significance of adenosine-mediated pulmonary vein (PV) dormant conduction is unclear. We prospectively followed patients with adenosine-mediated PV reconduction with a subsequent repeated ablation until there was no reconduction inducible with patients without reconduction after PV isolation.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n=179) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) without prior catheter ablation (CA) were enlisted in the study. We used a point-by-point CA and general anesthesia in all patients. Twenty minutes after PV isolation we administered adenosine in a dose sufficient to produce an atrioventricular block. If a dormant conduction was present (n=54) we performed additional ablation until there was no adenosine mediated reconduction inducible. During 36 months of follow-up, all patients were examined for eight 7-day ECG recordings. There was no difference in arrhythmia recurrence rate between patients with and without dormant conduction (29.6 vs. 24.8% at 12 months, P=0.500; 31.5 vs. 30.4% at 36 months, P=1.000), for any echocardiographic parameter or any parameter of the ablation procedure.

CONCLUSION

The patients with dormant conduction after adenosine during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with complete elimination of the dormant conduction by additional extensive ablation have the same outcome in the long term as patients without a dormant conduction.

No association between dormant conduction sites and pulmonary vein reconnection sites in late atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

OBJECTIVE

Despite use of provocation testing to unmask dormant left atrium (LA)-PV conduction after index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), AF recurrence still occurs, with PV reconnection as the main cause. In an effort to answer the question whether freedom from AF recurrence can be achieved by ablation that targets sites of dormant conduction, we compared sites of dormant conduction against sites of PV reconnection identified at the time of repeat ablation for AF recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group comprised 46 patients (30 men/16 women, aged 58.7±10.3 years) with AF (paroxysmal: n=37, persistent: n=9) who underwent repeat ablation for AF recurrence 12.3 (7.4-29.7) months after the index ablation procedure. Ipsilateral PVs were divided into 8 segments each (736 total segments), and the relation between dormant conduction sites and PV reconnection sites was determined per segment.

RESULTS

Dormant LA-PV conduction was unmasked and ablated in 22 (47.8%) of the 46 patients at sites within 43 (5.8%) of the 736 PV segments. Late PV reconnection was found within 122 (17%) of the 736 PV segments at the time of re-ablation for AF recurrence. Only 22 (18%) of these 122 PV segments corresponded to dormant conduction sites identified during the index procedure.

CONCLUSION

Although additional ablation to eliminate dormant PV conduction unmasked during the index ablation procedure is performed, the majority of PVs that show reconduction at the time of treatment for clinical AF recurrence are PVs that have not shown dormant conduction.

Adenosine triphosphate/adenosine guided pulmonary vein isolation does not improve the outcomes of ablation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most reliable predictor of success after ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) unmasks the dormant conduction and can be used to improve the effectiveness of PVI. The impact of ATP guided PVI on clinical outcomes is discordant in various randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES

To delineate the incremental benefit of ATP during PVI in patients with AF through a meta-analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Database searches through January 2017 identified 5 RCTs (enrolling 2839 patients) comparing ATP guided PVI versus standard PVI (non-ATP). Four trials exclusively studied paroxysmal AF while one trial included both paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF patients. Baseline characteristics, dose of adenosine and ablation strategies were clearly identified among all the trials. The risk ratio (RR) for AF episodes lasting >30 s after 3-month blanking period was calculated with random effects meta-analysis and showed no difference at a median follow up of 12 months [RR: 1.02, 95 % Confidence interval (CI): 0.85 to 1.25; p = 0.82]. Similarly, the number of repeat ablation was similar in both groups [RR: 1.02, 95 % CI: 0.63, 1.56; p = 0.98].

CONCLUSIONS

ATP guided PVI does not decrease the recurrence of AF or the need for repeat ablation at 12 months.

Feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia by cardiologists with the support of anesthesiologists during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The optimal methodology for sedation and anesthesia during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has not been well established. We assessed the feasibility of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) by cardiologists with support from anesthesiologists during AF ablation and quality of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and single procedure success rate at 12 months.

METHODS

TIVA was performed by cardiologists using IV propofol and fentanyl under controlled ventilation via i-gel™ without neuromuscular blocking drugs in 160 consecutive patients (80 nonparoxysmal) with no anticipated difficult airway or other severe diseases. Anesthesiologists were requested to be on standby during the procedure. The incidence of anesthesia-associated complications and ablation-associated complications were assessed. To evaluate the quality of PVI, the prevalence of acute adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-provoked PV reconnections and late PV reconnections among those requiring a redo procedure was analyzed.

RESULTS

TIVA was successfully completed in 152 patients (95%). In five (3%), we requested help from anesthesiologists, and in three (2%), TIVA was abandoned. No major anesthesia-associated complications were observed. Ablation-associated complications were observed in seven patients (4%). ATP provocation test was performed in 141 patients, and no acute PV reconnections were observed in 134 (95%). Success rates at 12 months were 85% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs. Twenty-one of 24 patients with recurrence underwent a redo session, and 18 (86%) had no PV reconnections.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA by cardiologists with support from anesthesiologists during AF ablation may be feasible. The success rate at 12 months was high, and prevalence of acute and late PV reconnection was very low.

Adenosine Testing After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Adenosine can be used to reveal dormant pulmonary vein (PV) conduction after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of adenosine administration in patients undergoing PVI for AF.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of 22 studies was performed to assess the rates of freedom from AF in 1) patients with dormant PV conduction versus patients without dormant PV conduction, and 2) patients given routine adenosine post PVI versus patients not given adenosine. Relative-risks (RR) were calculated using random effects modelling.

RESULTS

In 18 studies, 3038 patients received adenosine and freedom from AF in those patients with dormant PV reconnection was significantly lower (62.9%) compared to patients without PV reconnection (67.2%) (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). In seven studies with 3049 patients, the freedom from AF was significantly higher in patients who received adenosine (67%) versus those patients who did not receive adenosine (63%) (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed clear benefits of adenosine testing for freedom from AF recurrence. Adenosine-guided dormant conduction is associated with higher AF recurrence despite further ablation. Future studies should investigate the optimal methodology, including dosage and waiting time between PVI and adenosine administration.

Safety and efficacy of DOACs vs acenocoumarol in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic complications can be life-threatening during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuous treatment using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to uninterrupted acenocoumarol for periprocedural anticoagulation.

HYPOTHESIS

Continuous treatment with DOACs has similar safety and efficacy compared to acenocoumarol.

METHODS

We enrolled 474 patients (mean age, 58 years; 68.4% male) undergoing AF catheter ablation between June 2013 and December 2016. All patients were equally assigned to take acenocoumarol (group 1, 136 patients) or DOACs (group 2, 338 patients) for ≥2 months before the procedure. We compared thromboembolic and bleeding complications between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed no significant difference in major and minor complications between the 2 patient groups. Specifically, 3 of 136 patients (2.2%) using uninterrupted acenocoumarol had a major complication (1 patient [0.7%] had transient ischemic attack resolved 8 hours later, 1 [0.7%] had pericardial tamponade, and 1 [0.7%] had a subcapsular renal hematoma) and 2 patients (1.4%) had minor complications (1 [0.7%] pseudoaneurysm and 1 [0.7%] groin hematoma). In group 2, 1 of 338 patients (0.3%) had a major complication (transient ischemic attack). In the same group, 7 patients (2.1%) had a minor complication (1 patient [0.3%] presented with pseudoaneurysm, 4 [1.2%] with pericardial effusion <1 cm, 1 [0.3%] femoral arteriovenous fistula between the femoral artery and femoral vein, and 1 [0.7%] groin hematoma).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs and acenocoumarol have similar safety and effectiveness regarding thromboembolic complications prevention without increasing bleeding complications.

Adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of adenosine-mediated dormant pulmonary vein conduction, and whether such dormant conduction should be eliminated, remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of data from eligible studies to delineate the prognostic impact of adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using online databases in order to identify relevant studies from January 2004 to September 2016. Ten studies [six observational and four randomized control trials (RCTs)] were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Five studies (two observational and three RCTs) compared the efficacy of adenosine-mediated elimination of dormant conduction versus no adenosine test. Overall, the adenosine-guided ablation strategy displayed better long-term outcomes as compared with no adenosine testing (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.14, p=0.02; Heterogeneity: I²=42%, p: 0.14). The meta-analysis of only RCTs failed to show any differences between the two strategies (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.96-1.11, p=0.37; Heterogeneity: I² 0%, p: 0.41). Eight studies (five observational and three RCTs) addressed the efficacy of adenosine-induced dormant conduction and additional ablation versus no dormant conduction during adenosine challenge. Overall, a trend towards a better outcome in those without dormant conduction during drug challenge was noted (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03, p=0.11; Heterogeneity: I² 65% p: 0.006). The pooled analysis of RCTs failed to show any differences between the two arms (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.30, p= 0.57; Heterogeneity: I² 88%, p: 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation does not provide additional benefit in terms of freedom of arrhythmia recurrence.