Prediction of optimal cardiac resynchronization by vectors extracted from electrograms in dyssynchronous canine hearts

QRS area as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

QRS area, a three-dimensional QRS complex, is a novel vectorcardiography method of measuring the magnitude of electrical forces in the heart. Hypothetically, a greater QRS area denotes higher dyssynchrony and indicates potential benefits from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Previous studies suggest a positive correlation between QRS area and the degree of response to CRT, but its clinical use remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of the relationship between QRS area and survival benefit following CRT.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2021. We included studies with prospective and retrospective cohort designs that reported QRS area before CRT and total mortality. Data from each study were analyzed using a random-effects model. The results were reported as a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Five observational studies including 4,931 patients were identified. The cut-off values between large and small QRS areas ranged from 102-116 μVs. Our analysis showed a larger QRS area was statistically associated with increased 5-year survival in patients implanted with CRT (HR pooled 0.48, 95% CI 0.46-0.51, I² = 54%, P < 0.0001). Greater QRS area reduction (pre- and post-implantation) were associated with a lower total mortality rate (HR pooled 0.45, 95% CI 0.38-0.52, I² = 0%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Larger pre-implantation QRS area was associated with increased survival after CRT. QRS area reduction following CRT implantation was also associated with lower mortality. QRS area may potentially become an additional selection criterion for CRT implantations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Reduction in the QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with survival and echocardiographic response

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have shown that the baseline QRS area is associated with the clinical response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In this study, we investigated the association of QRS area reduction (∆QRS area) after CRT with the outcome. We hypothesize that a larger ∆QRS area is associated with a better survival and echocardiographic response.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electrocardiograms (ECG) obtained before and 2-12 months after CRT from 1299 patients in a multi-center CRT-registry were analyzed. The QRS area was calculated from vectorcardiograms that were synthesized from 12-lead ECGs. The primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and left ventricular (LV) assist device implantation. The secondary endpoint was the echocardiographic response, defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction ≥ of 15%. Patients with ∆QRS area above the optimal cut-off value (62 µVs) had a lower risk of reaching the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.43; confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.56, p < .001), and a higher chance of echocardiographic response (odds ratio [OR] 3.3;CI 2.4-4.6, p < .0001). In multivariable analysis, ∆QRS area was independently associated with both endpoints. In patients with baseline QRS area ≥109 µVs, survival, and echocardiographic response were better when the ∆QRS area was ≥62 µVs (p < .0001). Logistic regression showed that in patients with baseline QRS area ≥109 µVs, ∆QRS area was the only significant predictor of survival (OR: 0.981; CI: 0.967-0.994, p = .006).

CONCLUSION

∆QRS area is an independent determinant of CRT response, especially in patients with a large baseline QRS area. Failure to achieve a large QRS area reduction with CRT is associated with a poor clinical outcome.

Effect of QRS area reduction and myocardial scar on the hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Vectorcardiographic QRS area (QRS_area) predicts clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Myocardial scar adversely affects clinical outcomes after CRT.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study in patients with an ideally deployed quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead (QUAD) was to determine whether reducing QRS_area leads to an acute hemodynamic response (AHR) and whether scar affects this interaction.

METHODS

Patients (n = 26; age 69.2 ± 9.12 years [mean ± SD]) underwent assessment of the maximum rate of change of LV pressure (ΔLV dP/dt_max) during CRT using various left ventricular pacing locations (LVPLs). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scan was used to localize LV myocardial scar.

RESULTS

Interindividually, ΔQRS_area (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.81; P <.001) and change in QRS duration (ΔQRSd) (AUC 0.76; P <.001) predicted ΔLV dP/dt_max after CRT. Scar burden correlated with ΔQRS_area (r = 0.35; P = .003), ΔQRS_area (r = 0.35; P = .003), and ΔQRSd (r = 0.46; P <.001). A reduction in QRS_area was observed with LVPLs remote from scar (-3.28 ± 38.1 μVs) or in LVPLs in patients with no scar at all (-43.8 ± 36.8 μVs), whereas LVPLs over scar increased QRS_area (22.2 ± 58.4 μVs) (P <.001 for all comparisons). LVPLs within 1 scarred LV segment were associated with lower ΔLV dP/dt_max (-2.21% ± 11.5%) than LVPLs remote from scar (5.23% ± 10.3%; P <.001) or LVPLs in patients with no scar at all (10.2% ± 7.75%) (both P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Reducing QRS_area improves the AHR to CRT. Myocardial scar adversely affects ΔQRS_area and the AHR. These findings may support the use of ΔQRS_area and CMR in optimizing CRT using QUAD.

Changes in QRS Area and QRS Duration After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Predict Cardiac Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalizations, and Ventricular Arrhythmias

Background

Predicting clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and its optimization remain a challenge. We sought to determine whether pre‐ and postimplantation QRS area (QRS_area) predict clinical outcomes after CRT.

Methods and Results

In this retrospective study, QRS_area, derived from pre‐ and postimplantation vectorcardiography, were assessed in relation to the primary end point of cardiac mortality after CRT with or without defibrillation. Other end points included total mortality, total mortality or heart failure (HF) hospitalization, total mortality or major adverse cardiac events, and the arrhythmic end point of sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmias with or without a shock. In patients (n=380, age 72.0±12.4 years, 68.7% male) undergoing CRT over 7.7 years (median follow‐up: 3.8 years [interquartile range 2.3–5.3]), preimplantation QRS_area ≥102 μVs predicted cardiac mortality (HR: 0.36; P<0.001), independent of QRS duration (QRSd) and morphology (P<0.001). A QRS_area reduction ≥45 μVs after CRT predicted cardiac mortality (HR: 0.19), total mortality (HR: 0.50), total mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.44), total mortality or major adverse cardiac events (HR: 0.43) (all P<0.001) and the arrhythmic end point (HR: 0.26; P<0.001). A concomitant reduction in QRS_area and QRSd was associated with the lowest risk of cardiac mortality and the arrhythmic end point (both HR: 0.12, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Pre‐implantation QRS_area, derived from vectorcardiography, was superior to QRSd and QRS morphology in predicting cardiac mortality after CRT. A postimplant reduction in both QRS_area and QRSd was associated with the best outcomes, including the arrhythmic end point.

Improving Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

CRT is a cornerstone of therapy for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. By restoring left ventricular (LV) electrical and mechanical synchrony, CRT can reduce mortality, improve LV function and reduce heart failure symptoms. Since its introduction, many advances have been made that have improved the delivery of and enhanced the response to CRT. Improving CRT outcomes begins with proper patient selection so CRT is delivered to all populations that could benefit from it, and limiting the implantation of CRT in those with a small chance of response. In addition, advancements in LV leads and delivery technologies coupled with multimodality imaging and electrical mapping have enabled operators to place coronary sinus leads in locations that will optimise electrical and mechanical synchrony. Finally, new pacing strategies using LV endocardial pacing or His bundle pacing have allowed for CRT delivery and improved response in patients with poor coronary sinus anatomy or lack of response to traditional CRT.