Risk stratification of patients with left atrial appendage thrombus prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: An approach towards an individualized use of transesophageal echocardiography

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Omitting transesophageal echocardiography before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Data about necessity of performing transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to every catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the safety of an individualized risk-based approach to TOE with respect to thromboembolic cerebrovascular events (CVE) in patients undergoing CA for AF or left atrial tachycardia (AT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective clinical study based on our institutional registry database. Patients undergoing CA for AF or left-sided AT following initial AF ablation at two participating centers were enrolled. Prior to the procedure, patients were scheduled for TOE only if they had a history of thromboembolic stroke, left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus, or inappropriate anticoagulation regimen in the previous 3 to 4 weeks. The incidence of periprocedural cerebrovascular thromboembolic events was assessed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1155 patients (median age 70 years, 54.8% male, 48.1% had persistent AF/AT). In 261 patients, a TOE was performed; in 2 patients (0.7%), an LAA thrombus was detected, which led to cancellation of the catheter ablation; in 894 patients, the TOE was omitted. Of the 1153 (0.35%) patients who underwent ablation, 4 (0.35%) experienced a CVE (one TIA and three strokes). The rate of CVE in our study does not exceed that reported in most multicenter trials. The low event rates limited statistical analysis of possible risk factors for CVE. In all 4 patients with CVE, post-CVE imaging showed the absence of LAA thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

An individualized selective approach to TOE before catheter ablation of AF or left AT showed a very low risk of overt intraprocedural thromboembolic events for the population in our study. A further randomized controlled study is needed to determine whether TOE prior to catheter ablation without ICE could be omitted in patients with uninterrupted OAC without previous thromboembolic events or a history of left atrial thrombus.

Prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast on transesophageal echocardiography in patients scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

To avoid causing a thromboembolic event in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), patients are treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) prior to the procedure. Despite being on anticoagulants, some patients develop a left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT). To exclude the presence of LAAT, transesophageal ultrasound (TEE) is performed in all patients prior to the procedure. We hypothesized continuous treatment with anticoagulants would result in a low prevalence of LAAT, in patients with low CHA2DS2-VASc score.

METHOD

Medical records of consecutive patients planned to undergo AF ablation at Lund University Hospital during the years 2018-2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Examination protocols from transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography were examined for LAAT and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC). Patients with LAAT and SEC were compared to patients without using Mann-Whitney U-test and Pearson Chi-squared analysis to test for correlation.

RESULTS

Of 553 patients, three patients (0.54%) had LAAT, and 18 (3.25%) had spontaneous contrast (SEC). Patients with LAAT or SEC had a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, more often presented in AF at TEE and less often had a normal sized left atrium.

CONCLUSION

There is a low prevalence of LAAT and SEC in patients with AF scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation. Patients with SEC or LAAT tend to have paroxysmal AF less often and more often presented in AF at admission. No patients with CHA2DS2-VASc 0, paroxysmal AF, normal sized left atrium and sinus rhythm at TEE were found to have LAAT or SEC.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and persistent atrial fibrillation: 3-year-followed case series

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a promising alternative for stroke prevention in AF patients. We aimed to review the clinical outcomes of patients with AF and HCM at our center. We reviewed 673 patients who underwent LAAC implantation from 2014 to 2021 in a tertiary center, of whom 15 had HCM. AF Patients with HCM were compared with sex and age matched controls who also underwent LAAC. From 2014 to 2021, 673 AF patients received LAAC in a single center, of whom, 15 patients had HCM. LAAC devices were successfully implanted in 14 HCM patients and 59 patients in the control group. During the follow-up period (median 1151 days range: 132-2457 days), 2 HCM patient had ischemic strokes. There were another 2 HCM patients who had sudden cardiac death (SCD). Compared with the control, HCM patients had higher cumulative rate of combined death and stroke (26.67% vs 3.33%, P = .024). In our initial clinical experience, the cumulative stroke and death rate of the HCM patients was significantly higher than that of the non-HCM patients.

Predictors of thrombosis of left atrium and its appendage before catheter ablation or cardioversion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

Aim. To determine the incidence of left atrial (LA) and/or LA appendage (LAA) thrombosis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) (NAF) or atrial flutter (AFL) on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before elective catheter ablation (CA) or cardioversion (CV) and characterize the predictors of LA/LAA thrombosis among the indicators available in the routine practice of cardiologists and general practitioners.

Material and methods. In this retrospective, single-center, casecontrol study, the medical records of 1994 patients with NAF or AFL for the period 2014-2019, who underwent TEE before CA or elective CV, were analyzed. A thrombus in the LA/LAA was detected in 33 (1,6%) of them. For the comparison group, 167 patients were randomly selected without LA/LAA thrombosis. Demographic, anamnestic and clinical parameters, transthoracic echocardiography data, and laboratory results were analyzed as potential predictors of LA/LAA thrombosis.

Results. Patients with LA/LAA thrombosis were older (mean age, 64,8±1,6 vs 59,4±10,8 (p=0,01), more often had persistent or longstanding persistent AF, hypertension, heart failure, enlarged LA, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and estimated glomerular filtration rate, as well as more severe symptoms according to the modified European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) score and a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (median, 4,0 vs 2,0; p=0,0001). Oral anticoagulants were taken by 88% of patients; there were no significant differences in the presence and composition of anticoagulant therapy between the groups. Functional class (FC) according to the modified EHRA score (odds ratio (OR), 5,4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1,9814,96; p=0,001) and LVEF were independent predictors of LA/LAA thrombosis (OR, 0,87; 95% CI: 0,80-0,95; p=0,002). For EHRA class 3-4, the OR was 5,1; 95% CI: 2,3-11,4 (p<0,0001), for LVEF <48% — 7,4; 95% CI: 1,2-46,7 (p=0,03). For EHRA class 3-4, the sensitivity for LA/LAA thrombosis was 93,7%, specificity — 71,9%, positive predictive value — 50,0%, negative predictive value — 87,6%; for LVEF <48% — 66,7, 32,3, 31,9 and 91,6%, respectively.

Conclusion. In the studied group of patients with NAF or AFL, without severe structural heart disease and severe concomitant diseases, most of whom received oral anticoagulants, LA/LAA thrombosis at TEE before elective CA or CV was detected in 1,6% of cases. Among the indicators available in routine medical practice, the severity of arrhythmia symptoms, assessed by the modified EHRA score, and lower LVEF were independent predictors of LA/LAA thrombosis.

Preprocedural Multimodality Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with increased risk of heart failure, stroke, and death. In current medical practice, multimodality imaging is routinely used in the management of AF. Twenty-one years ago, the ACUTE trial (Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography) results were published, and the management of AF changed forever by incorporating transesophageal echocardiography guided cardioversion of patients in AF for the first time. Current applications of multimodality imaging in AF in 2022 include the use of transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography before cardioversion to exclude left atrial thrombus and in left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation. Transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance are clinically used for AF ablation planning. The decision to use a particular imaging modality in AF is based on patient's characteristics, guideline recommendation, institutional preferences, expertise, and cost. In this first of 2-part review series, we discuss the preprocedural role of echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in the AF, with regard to their clinical applications, relevant outcomes data and unmet needs, and highlights future directions in this rapidly evolving field.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) for primary and secondary stroke prevention in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: This pilot study enrolled 36 patients with HCM and AF who underwent LAAC between April 2017 and December 2019, of whom 22 were for primary stroke prevention and 14 were for secondary prevention.

Results: The patients enrolled in this study had non-obstructive (86.1%) or mild obstructive (13.9%) HCM. Patients in the Secondary Prevention Group had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (5.1 ± 1.4 vs. 2.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) and higher HAS-BLED scores (2.8 ± 1.0 vs. 1.5 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) compared with those in the Primary Prevention Group. Successful closure with satisfactory seals (residual leak ≤ 5 mm) was achieved in all patients, with complete occlusion in 86.4% of the Primary Prevention Group and 92.9% of the Secondary Prevention Group. Procedural-related complications included one pericardial effusion and one groin hematoma. One device-related thrombus was identified in the Secondary Prevention Group and resolved after anticoagulation. During a mean follow-up time of 28.4 months, one bleeding event was recorded. There were no thromboembolic events or deaths in either group, with 97.2% of the patients achieving freedom from anticoagulation therapy.

Conclusions: Initial results suggest that LAAC can be a safe and feasible alternative for primary and secondary stroke prevention in selected patients with HCM and AF. Further studies with larger samples are required.

The level of growth differentiation factor 15 as a predictor of left atrial thrombosis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

Aim    To study the role of blood concentration of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) as a predictor of left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombosis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF).Material and methods    538 patients with nonvalvular AF were admitted to the Tyumen Cardiology Research Center in 2019-2020 for radiofrequency ablation and elective cardioversion. According to findings of transesophageal echocardiography (EcoCG), 42 (7.8%) of these patients had LA/LAA thrombosis and 79 (14.7%) of them had the effect of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC). This comparative, cross-sectional, cohort study included at the initial stage 158 successively hospitalized patients with nonvalvular AF: group 1 (with LA/LAA thrombosis, n=42) and group 2 (without LA/LAA thrombosis and without SEC, n=116). To eliminate significant differences in age between the groups, an additional inclusion criterium was introduced, age from 45 to 75 years. Finally, 144 patients were included into the study: group 1 (with LA/LAA thrombosis, n=42, mean age 60.9±7.2 years) and group 2 (without LA/LAA thrombosis and without SEC, n=116, mean age 59.5±6.0 years). 93 (91%) patients in group 1 and 40 (95%) patients in group 2 had arterial hypertension (p=0.4168); 53 (52%) and 29 (^(%), respectively, had ischemic heart disease (p=0.0611). The groups did not differ in sex, profile of major cardiovascular diseases, or frequency and range of oral anticoagulant treatment. General clinical evaluation, EchoCG, and laboratory tests, including measurements of blood concentrations of GDF-15 and NT-proBNP, were performed.Results    In the group with LA/LAA thrombosis, 1) persistent AF prevailed whereas paroxysmal AF was more frequently observed in patients without thrombosis; 2) a tendency toward more pronounced chronic heart failure was observed; 3) tendencies toward a high median CHA2DS2‑VASc score and toward a greater proportion of patients with scores ≥3 were observed. According to EchoCG findings, group 1 had higher values of sizes and volumes of both atria and the right ventricle, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume and size, pulmonary artery systolic blood pressure, and LV myocardial mass index. LV ejection fraction (EF) was in the normal range in both groups but it was significantly lower for patients with LA/LAA thrombosis, 59.1±5.1 and 64.0±7.3, respectively (p=0.00006). Concentrations of GDF-15 (p=0.00025) and NT-proBNP were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (p=0.000001). After determining the threshold values for both biomarkers using the ROC analysis, two independent predictors of LA/LAA thrombosis were obtained by the stepwise multiple regression analysis: GDF-15 &gt;935.0 pg/ml (OR=4.132, 95 % CI 1.305-13.084) and LV EF (OR=0.859, 95 % CI 0.776-0.951). The ROC analysis assessed the model quality as good: AUC=0.776 (p&lt;0.001), sensitivity 78.3 %, specificity 78.3 %.Conclusion    For patients with nonvalvular AF, both increased GDF-15 (&gt;935.0 pg/ml) and LV EF are independent predictors for LA/LAA thrombosis.

Atrial thrombus detection on transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardioversion or catheter ablation: A pooled analysis of rates and predictors

OBJECTIVE

To summarize data on the rates and predictors of left atrial thrombus/left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT/LAAT) detection by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) before electrical cardioversion (ECV) or catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched to identify all studies providing relevant data and published by October 7, 2020. A random-effects meta-analysis method was used to pool effect size estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 85 studies were included, reporting data from 56 660 patients with AF. In patients undergoing CA and ECV, the pooled prevalence of LAT/LAAT was 1.8% and 7.5% in those not on oral anticoagulation (OAC), 1.8% and 5.5% in those taking OAC, and 1.3% and 4.9% in case of adequate OAC, respectively. According to the type of OAC, the prevalence was 2.0% and 7.6% for vitamin K antagonist, 1.3% and 3.5% for direct oral anticoagulant. Predictors of LAT/LAAT detection were nonparoxysmal AF (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.4-5.2), hypertension (OR: 2.9, 1.2-7.0), previous stroke (OR: 3.0, 1.6-5.63), heart failure (OR: 4.3, 2.7-6.8), and CHADS₂ score ≥2 (OR: 3.3, 1.9-5.8) for patients undergoing CA; and heart failure (OR: 2.8, 1.3-6.2) and the CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score (OR: 2.55, 1.5-4.5) for those undergoing ECV.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of LAT/LAAT in AF patients undergoing ECV or CA varies widely, mainly due to differences in patient risk profiles and OAC types. Further research should determine whether the predictors of LAT/LAAT detection identified by this study could be used to select patients who require preprocedural TEE.

Genetic and Clinical Predictors of Left Atrial Thrombus: A Single Center Case-Control Study

Left atrial (LA) thrombus formation is the presumed origin of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Beyond clinical risk factors, the factors causing formation of LA thrombi are not well known. In this case-control study, we analyzed clinical characteristics and genetic thrombophilia markers (factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin G20210A (FIIV), Tyr2561 variant of von Willebrand factor (VWF-V)) in 42 patients with AF and LA thrombus (LAT) and in 68 control patients with AF without LAT (CTR). Patients with LAT had more clinical conditions predisposing to stroke (mean CHA2DS2-VASc-score 3.4 ± 1.5 vs. 1.9 ± 1.4; P < 0.001), a higher LA volume (96 ± 32 vs. 76 ± 21 ml, P = 0.002) and lower LA appendage emptying velocity (0.21 ± 0.11vs. 0.43 ± 0.19 m/s, P < 0.001). Prevalence of FVL, FIIV and VWF-V mutations was not different, but in the subgroup of patients <65 years (y) there was a tendency for a higher incidence of VWF-V with a prevalence of 27% (LAT <65 y) vs. 7% (CTR <65 y, P = 0.066). These findings warrant further investigation of the VWF-V as a risk factor for LA thrombogenesis in younger patients.

Determinants of left atrium thrombi in scheduled cardioversion: an ENSURE-AF study analysis

Aims

ENSURE-AF (NCT 02072434) was the largest prospective randomized clinical trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (AF), which also provides the largest prospective dataset for transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) prior to cardioversion. This ancillary analysis investigated determinants of TOE-detected left atrium thrombi (LAT) in patients scheduled for electrical cardioversion (ECV).

Methods and results

The ENSURE-AF multicentre PROBE evaluation trial compared edoxaban 60 mg once daily (QD) with enoxaparin/warfarin in 2199 subjects undergoing ECV of non-valvular AF. Patients were stratified by the use of TOE, anticoagulant experience, and selected edoxaban dose. Electrical cardioversion was cancelled or deferred when TOEdetected LAT. In total, 1183 subjects were stratified to the TOE arm and LAT was reported in 91 (8.2%). In univariate analysis, age ≥75 years (26.4% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.0308), lower weight (86.5 ± 15.0 vs. 90.7 ± 18.0 kg, P = 0.0309), lower creatinine clearance (80.1 ± 30.6 vs. 93.2 ± 33.9 mL/min, P = 0.0007), heart failure (59.3% vs. 43.0%, P = 0.0029), and diuretic treatment (53.9% vs. 40.1%, P = 0.0141) were more prevalent in the LAT group. Non-significant trends were seen for higher mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (3.0 ± 1.41 vs. 2.7 ± 1.48, P = 0.0571) and more prevalent anticoagulation use prior to enrolment (60.4% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.0795) in the LAT group. In logistic regression analysis, age (P = 0.0202) and heart failure (P = 0.0064) were independently associated with LAT.

Conclusion

Elective ECV is commonly cancelled or deferred due to TOE-detected LAT in patients with non-valvular AF. Age ≥75 years and heart failure were associated with the presence of LAT.

[Therapeutic management of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent persistent cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with an increased mortality. Therefore, an effective differential treatment of patients is mandatory. After a risk stratification oral anticoagulation (OAC) should be initiated depending on the individual stroke risk of each patient. Alternatively, in the presence of contraindications for OAC and an increased risk for bleeding and/or stroke, the implantation of a left atrial appendage closure device can be considered. Symptomatic patients should undergo a rhythm control strategy if possible. Based on the risk-benefit considerations, catheter ablation (CA) of AF plays an increasingly important role in establishing long-term medicinal rhythm control. A pulmonary vein isolation can lead to freedom from AF for 1 year in 70-80% of patients with paroxysmal AF (and approximately 50% in persistent AF). So far, a survival advantage of CA could only be shown in patients with heart failure, so that in most cases this is only a symptomatic treatment for improvement in the quality of life.

Global peak left atrial longitudinal strain assessed by transthoracic echocardiography is a good predictor of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients in sinus rhythm with heart failure and very low ejection fraction - an observational study

BACKGROUND

Peak left atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) can help identify left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, few studies have been performed in patients in sinus rhythm without established indications for anticoagulation but with increased risk of LAAT, such as heart failure (HF) with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction patients. The primary aim of this study was to identify clinical and transthoracic echocardiography predictors of LAAT in HF patients with very low left ventricular ejection fraction and sinus rhythm. The secondary objective was to analyze frequencies and predictors of a composite clinical endpoint of death or hospitalization for ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We included 63 patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction < 25%, sinus rhythm at presentation, no history of atrial fibrillation, and without any established indications for anticoagulation. We determined whether clinical and transthoracic echocardiography parameters, including left atrial strain analysis, predicted LAAT. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed in all patients. When LAAT was detected, anticoagulation was recommended. The participants were followed for a median of 28.6 months (range 4-40) to determine the composite endpoint.

RESULTS

LAAT was found in 20 (31.7%) patients. Global PALS was the best independent predictor of LAAT in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (Gini coefficient 0.65, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.83). A global PALS value below 8% was a good discriminator of LAAT presence (odds ratio 30.4, 95% CI 7.2-128, p <  0.001). During follow-up, 18 subjects (28.6%) reached the composite clinical endpoint. CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and body surface area were significant predictors for the composite endpoint of death or hospitalization for ischemic stroke in the multivariate regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

LAAT was relatively common in our group of HF patients and PALS has shown prognostic potential in LAAT identification. Further research is needed to determine whether initiation of anticoagulation or additional screening supported by PALS measurements will improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

Comparison of transesophageal echocardiography findings after different anticoagulation strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

High risk of embolic events exists in both patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and patients in the perioperative period of ablation (effective treatment for AF). Therefore, anticoagulant therapy is important. Oral anticoagulants can be divided into two major categories: vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). VKAs, represented by warfarin, have been widely used as traditional anticoagulants, whereas NOACs have been used in clinical practice, but their anticoagulant effects and side effects are still the focus of research. We used a meta-analysis to compare the incidence of left atrial thrombi (LAT) between different anticoagulants.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases for observational studies that compared the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings for patients treated with NOACs and VKAs. The incidence of LAT and dense spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (dense SEC) were extracted as the basis of the meta-analysis.

Results

Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. We found that patients anticoagulated with NOACs and VKAs had similar incidence of LAT (OR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.55–1.00). After excluding the heterogeneous article by sensitivity analysis, we found the incidence of LAT in patients anticoagulated with NOACs is lower than VKAs (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.42–0.84). The results of subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of LAT among three types of NOACs have no significant difference (dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban, OR = 1.16 [0.75, 1.81]; rivaroxaban vs. apixaban, OR = 0.97 [0.54, 1.74]; dabigatran vs. apixaban, OR = 1.09 [0.55, 2.16]).

Conclusion

Patients anticoagulated with NOACs may have lower incidence of LAT than VKAs. The incidence of LAT among different type of NOACs are similar.

Prevalence and Management of Atrial Thrombi in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Before Pulmonary Vein Isolation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and management of left atrial (LA) thrombi detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

BACKGROUND

Little data are available on LA thrombi before PVI.

METHODS

All patients scheduled for PVI between April 2010 and April 2018 undergoing pre-procedural TEE were analyzed. Management of LA thrombus was at the discretion of the treating physician.

RESULTS

In this study, 1,753 pre-procedural TEE from 1,358 patients (mean age 61 ± 10 years, 28% female) were included. Anticoagulation was used in 86% of all TEE (51% with direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC], 35% with vitamin K antagonists [VKA]). Thrombi were found in 11 TEE (0.6%), all in the LA appendage. Of the 11 patients with a thrombus, 5 (46%) had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 2 (18%) had a CHA₂DS₂-VASc (Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 Years, Diabetes Mellitus, Prior Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack or Thromboembolism, Vascular Disease, Age 65 to 74 Years, Sex) score of 1, and 5 (46%) were in sinus rhythm at the time of TEE. Of the 8 patients (72%) on anticoagulation therapy, 5 were treated with DOAC and 3 with VKA. Starting anticoagulation (n = 3), switching to VKA with a target international normalized ratio of 2.5 to 3 (n = 3), or switching to a DOAC (n = 1) or a different DOAC (n = 4) resulted in thrombus resolution in 9 of 11 patients (82%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation scheduled for PVI, LA thrombi are rare and present in <1%. Thrombi were found in patients on VKA and DOAC, in low-risk patients, and despite sinus rhythm. Thrombus resolution was achieved in the majority of patients by changing the anticoagulation regimen.

Predictive value of red cell distribution width on left atrial thrombus or left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive value of red cell distribution width (RDW) on left atrial thrombus (LAT) or left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (LASEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We reviewed 692 patients who were diagnosed as non-valvular AF and underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute from April 2014 to December 2015. The baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory test of blood routine, electrocardiograph measurements were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were examined with LAT/LASEC under TEE. The mean RDW level was significantly higher in LAT/LASEC patients compared with the non-LAT/LASEC patients (13.59% ± 1.07% vs. 14.34% ± 1.34%; P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed and indicated the best RDW cut point was 13.16%. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that RDW level > 13.16% could be an independent risk factor for LAT/LASEC in patients with AF.

CONCLUSION

Elevated RDW level is associated with the presence of LAT/LASEC and could be with moderate predictive value for LAT/LASEC in patients with non-valvular AF.